UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit

Two belts at Madison Square Garden. On Saturday, November 14, Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets unbeaten Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) for the heavyweight championship, and Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes is the five-round women's bantamweight co-main. Editorial estimate: Harrison 63%, Nunes 37%. Live on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM PT.

UFC 334 Gane vs Hokit official poster — Madison Square Garden, New York City, November 14, 2026
Saturday, November 14, 2026New York City, New York, United StatesMadison Square Garden
⚡ Upcoming Event12 Fights · 2 Titles
Main Card: Paramount+
Prelims: Paramount+
Start Time: 5:00 PM ET
Start Time by Timezone
Main-card time as listed. The U.S. is on standard time. Prelims start earlier the same day.
ET
New York (Local)
5:00 PM
PT
Pacific US/Canada
2:00 PM
GMT
United Kingdom / Ireland
10:00 PM
CET
Central Europe
11:00 PM
GST
Abu Dhabi, UAE
2:00 AM (Sun)
Free newsletter

Get picks for this card

UFC 334: Two Belts at Madison Square Garden

Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) for the heavyweight title. Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes is the women's bantamweight co-main.

12 fights · 2 titles📺 Paramount+🕒 5:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM PTFull preview & FAQ ↓

UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit Fights, Analytics & Predictions

💡 BetOnline is our preferred reference when available. We show the selected source and implied probability; this is not a guarantee of the best price across all books.

Heavyweight · 5 rounds

How to read these filters

Market differences are not a ranking of best bets. Conviction is editorial; a close matchup does not automatically mean poor data.

Fights shown: 12/12 · Analyses available: 12/12

Main Card

🏆 Main eventDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)14 / 4 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Ciryl Gane

Ciryl Gane

“Bon Gamin”

14-2-0

🏆 UFC Heavyweight Championship
5 Rounds

Editorial estimate

64%VS36%
Josh Hokit

Josh Hokit

“The Incredible Hok”

10-0-0

Tactical key

Eight inches of reach and 2.31 absorbed against 5.28 keep Gane favored in a 30-foot cage. Hokit's live number is 3.73 takedowns per 15 into Gane's 47% takedown defence — the Blaydes blueprint, not a kickboxing fight.

Ciryl Gane

Freshness unverified
Estimated EV
-13.1%
Fair decimal odds
1.56
Reference quote-280 (BetOnline)

Josh Hokit

Freshness unverified
Estimated EV
+19.5%
Fair decimal odds
2.78
Reference quote+232 (BetOnline)
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 6/10

What limits this estimate

  • 3.73 takedowns per 15 minutes and a win over Curtis Blaydes
  • Gane's 47% takedown defence, and the Jones guillotine as proof elite grapplers can end Gane early
  • 1.24 knockdowns per 15 and a stoppage of Derrick Lewis

Ciryl Gane: Stay long, punish entries with the 81-inch reach and 60% striking defence, and do not accept a prolonged wrestling round the way the Jones fight ended.

Josh Hokit: Turn the Blaydes blueprint on a man with 47% takedown defence, get chest-to-chest, and finish on the ground or in the clinch before a 25-minute kickboxing match develops.

Ciryl Gane

Reference quote: -280 (BetOnline)

Edge vs no-vig market: -7.0 pp

Freshness unverified

Josh Hokit

Reference quote: +232 (BetOnline)

Edge vs no-vig market: +7.0 pp

Freshness unverified

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
⭐ Co-MainDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)3 / 18 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
🏆 UFC Women's Bantamweight Championship
5 Rounds

Editorial estimate

63%VS37%
Amanda Nunes

Amanda Nunes

“The Lioness”

23-5-0

Tactical key

Harrison wins if 2.84 TD/15 becomes the Holm choke and Peña kimura. Nunes wins if 82% takedown defence and 0.63 KD/15 keep this standing after three years away. No defending label is assigned; Harrison is the title holder after Peña, and Nunes vacated in June 2023.

Kayla Harrison

Freshness unverified
Estimated EV
-5.5%
Fair decimal odds
1.59
Reference quote-200 (BetOnline)

Amanda Nunes

Freshness unverified
Estimated EV
-0.5%
Fair decimal odds
2.70
Reference quote+169 (BetOnline)
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • Thirteen knockout wins and 0.63 knockdowns per 15 minutes
  • 82% takedown defence against a woman whose whole game is the throw
  • Three extra inches of reach and four of leg reach

Kayla Harrison: Force ties, get the fight to the mat, and convert 2.84 TD/15 into the control and submissions that beat Holm and Peña. Do not spend five rounds at the end of a 69-inch reach.

Amanda Nunes: Use +3" reach and 0.63 KD/15 before the clinch becomes a throw. Her 82% takedown defence is the whole upset if it holds after three years away.

Kayla Harrison

Reference quote: -200 (BetOnline)

Edge vs no-vig market: -1.2 pp

Freshness unverified

Amanda Nunes

Reference quote: +169 (BetOnline)

Edge vs no-vig market: +1.2 pp

Freshness unverified

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Main CardLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)5 / 1 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Flyweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

42%VS58%
Bilal Hasan

Bilal Hasan

“The IndoNinja”

10-0-0

Tactical key

Hasan is favored on reach, age, finish rate and Gurule's 1-4 UFC log. Conviction stays at 4 because Hasan's entire Octagon file is one knockout. Gurule's path is a long volume fight the debutant has not had to win in the UFC.

Luis Gurule

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.38
Reference quote—

Bilal Hasan

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.72
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Five UFC fights against a one-fight rate line
  • Real volume at 5.44 SLpM
  • Hasan absorbed 4.38 and defended at 50% in the only Octagon look

Luis Gurule: Make it ugly and long. His one UFC win was a decision. His volume is real. Hasan's 4:07 average says the debutant has not had to win a third round in the UFC.

Bilal Hasan: Stay long, use the 70-inch reach, and find the chin that Osbourne already found. Do not turn it into a fifteen-minute volume fight if the knockout is there in round two, which is when Rojas ended.

Luis Gurule

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Bilal Hasan

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Main CardDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)9 / 3 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Middleweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

55%VS45%
Yousri Belgaroui

Yousri Belgaroui

“Baby Face Assassin”

11-3-0

Tactical key

Borralho wins if 1.25 TD/15 turns a 30-foot cage into the de Ridder control fight. Belgaroui wins if 6'6", 6.44 SLpM and 1.06 KD/15 keep it kickboxing for three rounds. That is why a #5 is only a 55% favorite.

Caio Borralho

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.82
Reference quote—

Yousri Belgaroui

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.22
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • 6'6", 79-inch reach, 47-inch legs
  • 6.44 SLpM at 63% accuracy and 1.06 knockdowns per 15
  • 3-0 in the UFC, all stoppages, never finished as a pro

Caio Borralho: Turn 1.25 takedowns per 15 minutes into the control that beat de Ridder and Cannonier. Do not spend nine minutes at the end of a 79-inch reach trading 3.47 output for 6.44.

Yousri Belgaroui: Keep the 30-foot cage big. Use 6'6", the right knee, and the 1.06 knockdown rate before a body lock becomes a round.

Caio Borralho

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Yousri Belgaroui

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Main CardEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)11 / 29 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Welterweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

57%VS43%
Kevin Holland

Kevin Holland

“Trail Blazer”

29-15-0

Tactical key

Medic's four straight first-round knockouts against Holland's +10" reach in a 30-foot cage. Close once early, or live at the end of an 81-inch jab for fifteen minutes.

Uros Medic

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.75
Reference quote—

Kevin Holland

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.33
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • Ten inches of reach in a 30-foot cage
  • 0.6 submissions per 15 minutes against a 0.0 rate
  • 29 UFC bouts against 11

Uros Medic: Close the ten inches once, early, the way the Neal and Salikhov fights ended. Do not spend nine minutes at the end of an 81-inch reach trying to win a kickboxing decision at a distance he does not own. Southpaw entries have to be commits, not feels.

Kevin Holland: Use the 30-foot cage. Make Medic walk into the 81-inch jab and the counters. If the pocket gets tied, the anaconda and the D'Arce are on the log. A decision is a win here — he just took one against Randy Brown.

Uros Medic

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Kevin Holland

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis

Prelims

PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)7 / 1 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Lightweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

58%VS42%

Tactical key

Sadykhov's southpaw knockout chart and seven UFC fights against Nascimento's one-fight 155 booking after a welterweight debut — with Sadykhov's two-fight KO skid as the live reversal.

Nazim Sadykhov

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.72
Reference quote—

Jefferson Nascimento

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.38
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Knocked out in each of his last two fights, one in 91 seconds
  • Absorbs 5.42 per minute behind 49% defence
  • Nascimento's only UFC night was competitive until 4:28 of round three

Nazim Sadykhov: Use the southpaw output before the fight becomes a measuring contest he can lose in one punch, the way Camilo ended it. 4.69 SLpM and the Motta knockout are the case. 72% takedown defence matters only if Nascimento decides to wrestle — he did not, in his debut.

Jefferson Nascimento: Stay at the end of the 70-inch reach, make Sadykhov lead, and do not volunteer the pocket that has been stopping Sadykhov. A decision is a live win. His debut almost was one. The weight cut back to 155 is the unknown, not a proven advantage.

Nazim Sadykhov

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Jefferson Nascimento

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)11 / 1 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Bantamweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

60%VS40%

Tactical key

Yanez's 5.96 SLpM and Garbrandt knockout against Díaz's 5.50 TD/15 and Wellmaker choke — 30 feet for the boxer, fence for the wrestler.

Adrian Yanez

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.67
Reference quote—

Juan Díaz

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.50
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • 5.50 TD/15 and a rear-naked choke in his only UFC fight
  • Yanez absorbs 5.24 and has been finished and held to a draw recently
  • The career line does not yet include the Garbrandt win, so the striking edge is slightly stale in his favor

Adrian Yanez: Keep it at the end of the 70-inch reach in a 30-foot cage, land the combination that stopped Garbrandt and Salvador, and stuff the shot at something like the 75% he has posted. He has no submission game on the rate line. The win is strikes or a decision built on strikes.

Juan Díaz: Make it the Wellmaker fight. Five takedowns and a rear-naked choke do not require him to out-point 5.96 SLpM. The spinning elbow is on the Contender Series log. It is not the UFC win.

Adrian Yanez

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Juan Díaz

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)22 / 7 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Stephen Thompson

Stephen Thompson

“Wonderboy”

17-9-1

Welterweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

57%VS43%
Charles Radtke

Charles Radtke

“Chuck”

12-5-0

Tactical key

Wonderboy's +3" reach and karate in a 30-foot cage against a wrestler on a two-fight streak — style bet on a 43-year-old who has lost three in a row since December 2022.

Stephen Thompson

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.75
Reference quote—

Charles Radtke

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.33
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Thompson is 43 and has lost three in a row
  • Bonfim and Buckley both beat him with takedowns. Radtke's rate is 1.99
  • The Frunza choke is a recent submission win

Stephen Thompson: Use the 75-inch reach and the 30-foot cage, land the karate side kick, and do not accept the fence cycles that decided Bonfim and Buckley. Three rounds means he does not get the fifth he used to have. He also does not need it if the fight stays upright. His submission rate is 0.0. The win is strikes or a decision.

Charles Radtke: Wrestle early, the way the Prado and Frunza fights were won, and do not stand in the pocket that Malott ended in 26 seconds. A rear-naked choke is on the log. A boring decision on top also wins.

Stephen Thompson

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Charles Radtke

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)27 / 8 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Drew Dober

Drew Dober

29-15-0

Lightweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

54%VS46%
Chris Duncan

Chris Duncan

“The Problem”

15-3-0

Tactical key

Southpaw finisher on two straight knockouts against a grappler whose last fight was a Moicano rear-naked choke loss — Torres is a Dober loss, not a misleading Win.

Drew Dober

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.85
Reference quote—

Chris Duncan

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.17
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • 2.92 TD/15 against a man who completes takedowns at 16%
  • He submitted Terrance McKinney in round one
  • Younger, slightly bigger, and the ranks are a slot apart

Drew Dober: Southpaw left hand, the punch that stopped Johnson, and do not shoot. 16% takedown accuracy is not a weapon. 58% takedown defence has to be good enough that Duncan cannot live on top the way he did against McKinney. The wins are knockouts. Believe that.

Chris Duncan: Wrestle. 2.92 TD/15 is the edge the striking table does not show. The anaconda of McKinney is the finish. The Moicano loss is the warning: a better submission fighter can reverse that script in round two.

Drew Dober

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Chris Duncan

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)47 / 14 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Jim Miller

Jim Miller

“A-10”

39-19-0

Lightweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

44%VS56%

Tactical key

McKinney's first-round clock against Miller's guillotine at 43. Close once early like Nelson, or give the neck like Gordon and the upset is live.

Jim Miller

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.27
Reference quote—

Terrance McKinney

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.79
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • He guillotined Gordon in May, from the bottom, after a takedown
  • 22 of 39 wins are submissions
  • #17 against #37, and 47 UFC fights

Jim Miller: Force the shot, or wait for it, and lock the guillotine he has now finished people with. He does not need to win a striking round. He needs the mistake. Hooper is the version where the wrestler is careful and the fifteen minutes go the other way. McKinney has not been that wrestler.

Terrance McKinney: Start the way the Nelson fight started. 6.83 SLpM and a switch stance against a 43-year-old who lands 2.92 is the minute that matters. If Miller catches a kick and looks for the guillotine, that is the Duncan risk. Do not hang the neck out the way Gordon did, and do not let a scramble become bottom position.

Jim Miller

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Terrance McKinney

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)3 / 3 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Baisangur Susurkaev

Baisangur Susurkaev

“Hunter”

12-0-0

Middleweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

60%VS40%

Tactical key

Six inches and 5.74 SLpM against a southpaw who finished the same McConico two rounds earlier — size vs defensive striking.

Baisangur Susurkaev

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.67
Reference quote—

Donte Johnson

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.50
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • He knocked out the same McConico in round one
  • 2.11 SApM and 61% defence are the best defensive striking numbers in the fight
  • Southpaw, unbeaten, and the takedown accuracy cell is 100% on the short line

Baisangur Susurkaev: Use the 79-inch reach and the 5.74 SLpM, make Johnson cover six inches of height, and look for the choke that ended Santos and Nolan. The McConico knockout took until round three. Do not assume a first-round finish. The log does not have one on the roster.

Donte Johnson: Southpaw counter, stay at the end of his own 74 inches, and do not get stuck under a man who out-landed Santos 107-78. The Brundage split decision is the path if the knockout is not there. The Dumas guillotine is the finish if a neck appears. His defensive striking is the real edge. His size is not.

Baisangur Susurkaev

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Donte Johnson

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)14 / 3 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Women's Bantamweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

42%VS58%

Tactical key

Mesquita's three UFC submissions and 3.6 Sub/15 against Chiasson's +7" height — Pérez already took her down six times.

Macy Chiasson

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.38
Reference quote—

Bia Mesquita

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.72
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • +7" height and +5" reach in a 30-foot cage
  • 14 UFC fights against 3, rank #10, announced SOS 37 against 9
  • A career chart that includes four knockouts and four decisions

Macy Chiasson: Stay at the end of the 72-inch reach in a 30-foot cage, stuff the first layer, and turn it into the kind of fight her chart says she can win by knockout or decision. If Pérez's six takedowns happen again, the reach never enters the fight. 62% takedown defence is the number that has to show up.

Bia Mesquita: Close the seven inches, complete the shot at anything like 75%, and find the armbar or the rear-naked choke she has used in all three UFC wins. She does not need to out-point Chiasson for fifteen minutes. Mullins out-landed her 10-3 and still tapped.

Macy Chiasson

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Bia Mesquita

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Madison Square Garden uses the standard 30-foot Octagon. Twelve bouts are on the announced card, including two championship fights. Each fight box links to a preview page.

Deep Dive

Event Preview, FAQ & Methodology

The announced UFC 334 card, both championship fights, and the editorial win estimates on this page.

🥊

The Story

UFC 334: Two Belts at Madison Square Garden

📍 Madison Square Garden, New York City🗓 Saturday, November 14, 2026📺 Paramount+

UFC 334 puts two championship fights in the same building. Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets unbeaten Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) over five rounds for the heavyweight belt. The co-main is five rounds at 135: Kayla Harrison (19-1, #1) against Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked) for the women's bantamweight championship.

The rest of the main card is Gurule–Hasan at flyweight, Borralho–Belgaroui at middleweight, and Medic–Holland at welterweight. Seven prelims follow, including Sadykhov–Nascimento booked at 155 even though Nascimento is ranked at welterweight. Editorial win estimates are published for each bout. The main card is listed for 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+.

🥊

What is UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit?

UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit is a numbered UFC event on Saturday, November 14, 2026 at Madison Square Garden in New York City, New York, with twelve bouts announced and two championship fights. The five-round heavyweight main event for the UFC Heavyweight Championship is Ciryl Gane (14-2, ranked #2) vs. Josh Hokit (10-0, ranked #10). The five-round co-main is the UFC Women's Bantamweight Championship: Kayla Harrison (19-1, ranked #1) vs. Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked). Main card, three rounds: Luis Gurule (11-4, #37) vs. Bilal Hasan (10-0, #39) at flyweight; Caio Borralho (18-2, #5) vs. Yousri Belgaroui (11-3, #33) at middleweight; Uros Medic (14-3, #12) vs. Kevin Holland (29-15, #13) at welterweight. Prelims: Nazim Sadykhov (11-3-1, #44 lightweight) vs. Jefferson Nascimento (13-1, #71 welterweight) booked at 155; Adrian Yanez (18-6-1, #24) vs. Juan Díaz (16-1-1, #52) at bantamweight; Stephen Thompson (17-9-1, #33) vs. Charles Radtke (12-5, #38) at welterweight; Drew Dober (29-15, #34) vs. Chris Duncan (15-3, #36) at lightweight; Jim Miller (39-19, #17) vs. Terrance McKinney (18-9, #37) at lightweight; Baisangur Susurkaev (12-0, #38) vs. Donte Johnson (9-0, #41) at middleweight; Macy Chiasson (11-6, #10) vs. Bia Mesquita (8-0, #12) at women's bantamweight. Editorial win estimates are published for all twelve bouts. The card streams on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET (2:00 PM PT).

🕒

When is UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit and what time does it start?

UFC 334 streams live from Madison Square Garden in New York City on Saturday, November 14, 2026, with the main card beginning at 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+. Local New York time is 5:00 PM ET. The United States has already fallen back to standard time, so that is 2:00 PM PT, 10:00 PM GMT in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 11:00 PM CET in Central Europe, and 2:00 AM Gulf Standard Time on Sunday in Abu Dhabi. Prelims begin earlier the same day, also on Paramount+. All listed times follow the supplied card listing and remain subject to broadcast changes.

📋

Who is fighting at UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit?

Heavyweight championship, five rounds: Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) vs. Josh Hokit (10-0, #10). Women's bantamweight championship, five rounds: Kayla Harrison (19-1, #1) vs. Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked). Main card: Luis Gurule (11-4, #37) vs. Bilal Hasan (10-0, #39) at flyweight; Caio Borralho (18-2, #5) vs. Yousri Belgaroui (11-3, #33) at middleweight; Uros Medic (14-3, #12) vs. Kevin Holland (29-15, #13) at welterweight. Prelims: Nazim Sadykhov (11-3-1, #44) vs. Jefferson Nascimento (13-1, #71) at 155; Adrian Yanez (18-6-1, #24) vs. Juan Díaz (16-1-1, #52) at bantamweight; Stephen Thompson (17-9-1, #33) vs. Charles Radtke (12-5, #38) at welterweight; Drew Dober (29-15, #34) vs. Chris Duncan (15-3, #36) at lightweight; Jim Miller (39-19, #17) vs. Terrance McKinney (18-9, #37) at lightweight; Baisangur Susurkaev (12-0, #38) vs. Donte Johnson (9-0, #41) at middleweight; Macy Chiasson (11-6, #10) vs. Bia Mesquita (8-0, #12) at women's bantamweight.

🤖

Who does the MMA Analytics model favor in Gane vs. Hokit?

The editorial estimate is Ciryl Gane 64% and Josh Hokit 36% for the heavyweight championship, conviction 6 of 10, and Kayla Harrison 63% and Amanda Nunes 37% for the women's bantamweight championship. BetOnline on September 22, 2026 was Gane −280 / Hokit +232 and Harrison −200 / Nunes +169. Fair prices from those editorial splits are about −178/+178 and −170/+170. Every other bout has an editorial split and no BetOnline price. These are analyst estimates, not a calibrated model.

⚠️

Is the Gane vs. Hokit main event confirmed?

Yes. Ciryl Gane (#2) vs. Josh Hokit (#10) is the five-round UFC Heavyweight Championship main event at Madison Square Garden on November 14, 2026. Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes (unranked) is the five-round UFC Women's Bantamweight Championship co-main. Ten more bouts complete a twelve-fight card. All twelve stream on Paramount+. Card order follows the announced bout order and remains subject to change.

📊Analysis Reliability Framework

UFC experience describes the size of the available sample, not the chance of winning. A short UFC record leaves more uncertainty about how a fighter performs against different styles. Opponent quality, recent changes and missing statistics also matter; five bouts alone do not establish that a prediction is well calibrated.

🔴

Limited UFC sample

<3 UFC Bouts

Limited UFC data available. Analysis relies more heavily on external sources and pre-UFC performance patterns.

🟡

Developing UFC sample

3-4 UFC Bouts

Some UFC evidence is available, but a few matchups can strongly influence the averages. Check opponent quality and the limitations in each analysis.

🟢

Established UFC sample

5+ UFC Bouts

More UFC observations are available. This does not guarantee predictive accuracy; changes in opposition, injuries and style can still limit the estimate.

Note: All fights receive thorough analysis regardless of UFC experience levels. Analyst conviction is an editorial assessment, not a measured probability or statistical confidence interval.

Model vs market

Yellow marks our forecast favorite. The comparison shows our editorial win estimate against the probability implied by each quote. Gap is in percentage points (pp), includes bookmaker margin, and is not expected return.

Fighter AWin estimate AMarket / implied AFighter BWin estimate BMarket / implied BModel / market & our read
Ciryl GaneAnalyst favorite64%-280 (BetOnline)73.7% impliedJosh Hokit36%+232 (BetOnline)30.1% implied
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapCiryl Gane64%73.7%-9.7 ppJosh Hokit36%30.1%+5.9 pp

Our read: We favor Ciryl Gane. Josh Hokit offers the positive price gap, despite not being our outright pick.

Quote dates unverified · recheck prices

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Kayla HarrisonAnalyst favorite63%-200 (BetOnline)66.7% impliedAmanda Nunes37%+169 (BetOnline)37.2% implied
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapKayla Harrison63%66.7%-3.7 ppAmanda Nunes37%37.2%-0.2 pp

Our read: We favor Kayla Harrison. Neither quote offers a meaningful positive gap against our estimate.

Quote dates unverified · recheck prices

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Luis Gurule42%N/A—Bilal HasanAnalyst favorite58%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapLuis Gurule42%——Bilal Hasan58%——

Our read: We favor Bilal Hasan. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Caio BorralhoAnalyst favorite55%N/A—Yousri Belgaroui45%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapCaio Borralho55%——Yousri Belgaroui45%——

Our read: We narrowly lean Caio Borralho. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Uros MedicAnalyst favorite57%N/A—Kevin Holland43%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapUros Medic57%——Kevin Holland43%——

Our read: We favor Uros Medic. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Nazim SadykhovAnalyst favorite58%N/A—Jefferson Nascimento42%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapNazim Sadykhov58%——Jefferson Nascimento42%——

Our read: We favor Nazim Sadykhov. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Adrian YanezAnalyst favorite60%N/A—Juan Díaz40%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapAdrian Yanez60%——Juan Díaz40%——

Our read: We favor Adrian Yanez. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Stephen ThompsonAnalyst favorite57%N/A—Charles Radtke43%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapStephen Thompson57%——Charles Radtke43%——

Our read: We favor Stephen Thompson. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Drew DoberAnalyst favorite54%N/A—Chris Duncan46%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapDrew Dober54%——Chris Duncan46%——

Our read: We narrowly lean Drew Dober. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Jim Miller44%N/A—Terrance McKinneyAnalyst favorite56%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapJim Miller44%——Terrance McKinney56%——

Our read: We favor Terrance McKinney. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Baisangur SusurkaevAnalyst favorite60%N/A—Donte Johnson40%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapBaisangur Susurkaev60%——Donte Johnson40%——

Our read: We favor Baisangur Susurkaev. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Macy Chiasson42%N/A—Bia MesquitaAnalyst favorite58%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapMacy Chiasson42%——Bia Mesquita58%——

Our read: We favor Bia Mesquita. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Event Discussion

No comments yet
Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.