UFC 334: Two Belts at Madison Square Garden
Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) for the heavyweight title. Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes is the women's bantamweight co-main.
Two belts at Madison Square Garden. On Saturday, November 14, Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets unbeaten Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) for the heavyweight championship, and Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes is the five-round women's bantamweight co-main. Editorial estimate: Harrison 63%, Nunes 37%. Live on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM PT.

Get picks for this card — model picks + card previews in your inbox.
Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) for the heavyweight title. Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes is the women's bantamweight co-main.
💡 BetOnline is our preferred reference when available. We show the selected source and implied probability; this is not a guarantee of the best price across all books.
Main event
Heavyweight · 5 rounds
Market differences are not a ranking of best bets. Conviction is editorial; a close matchup does not automatically mean poor data.
Fights shown: 12/12 · Analyses available: 12/12
Tactical key
Eight inches of reach and 2.31 absorbed against 5.28 keep Gane favored in a 30-foot cage. Hokit's live number is 3.73 takedowns per 15 into Gane's 47% takedown defence — the Blaydes blueprint, not a kickboxing fight.
What limits this estimate
Ciryl Gane: Stay long, punish entries with the 81-inch reach and 60% striking defence, and do not accept a prolonged wrestling round the way the Jones fight ended.
Josh Hokit: Turn the Blaydes blueprint on a man with 47% takedown defence, get chest-to-chest, and finish on the ground or in the clinch before a 25-minute kickboxing match develops.
Reference quote: -280 (BetOnline)
Edge vs no-vig market: -7.0 pp
Freshness unverified
Reference quote: +232 (BetOnline)
Edge vs no-vig market: +7.0 pp
Freshness unverified
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Harrison wins if 2.84 TD/15 becomes the Holm choke and Peña kimura. Nunes wins if 82% takedown defence and 0.63 KD/15 keep this standing after three years away. No defending label is assigned; Harrison is the title holder after Peña, and Nunes vacated in June 2023.
What limits this estimate
Kayla Harrison: Force ties, get the fight to the mat, and convert 2.84 TD/15 into the control and submissions that beat Holm and Peña. Do not spend five rounds at the end of a 69-inch reach.
Amanda Nunes: Use +3" reach and 0.63 KD/15 before the clinch becomes a throw. Her 82% takedown defence is the whole upset if it holds after three years away.
Reference quote: -200 (BetOnline)
Edge vs no-vig market: -1.2 pp
Freshness unverified
Reference quote: +169 (BetOnline)
Edge vs no-vig market: +1.2 pp
Freshness unverified
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Hasan is favored on reach, age, finish rate and Gurule's 1-4 UFC log. Conviction stays at 4 because Hasan's entire Octagon file is one knockout. Gurule's path is a long volume fight the debutant has not had to win in the UFC.
What limits this estimate
Luis Gurule: Make it ugly and long. His one UFC win was a decision. His volume is real. Hasan's 4:07 average says the debutant has not had to win a third round in the UFC.
Bilal Hasan: Stay long, use the 70-inch reach, and find the chin that Osbourne already found. Do not turn it into a fifteen-minute volume fight if the knockout is there in round two, which is when Rojas ended.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Borralho wins if 1.25 TD/15 turns a 30-foot cage into the de Ridder control fight. Belgaroui wins if 6'6", 6.44 SLpM and 1.06 KD/15 keep it kickboxing for three rounds. That is why a #5 is only a 55% favorite.
What limits this estimate
Caio Borralho: Turn 1.25 takedowns per 15 minutes into the control that beat de Ridder and Cannonier. Do not spend nine minutes at the end of a 79-inch reach trading 3.47 output for 6.44.
Yousri Belgaroui: Keep the 30-foot cage big. Use 6'6", the right knee, and the 1.06 knockdown rate before a body lock becomes a round.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Medic's four straight first-round knockouts against Holland's +10" reach in a 30-foot cage. Close once early, or live at the end of an 81-inch jab for fifteen minutes.
What limits this estimate
Uros Medic: Close the ten inches once, early, the way the Neal and Salikhov fights ended. Do not spend nine minutes at the end of an 81-inch reach trying to win a kickboxing decision at a distance he does not own. Southpaw entries have to be commits, not feels.
Kevin Holland: Use the 30-foot cage. Make Medic walk into the 81-inch jab and the counters. If the pocket gets tied, the anaconda and the D'Arce are on the log. A decision is a win here — he just took one against Randy Brown.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Sadykhov's southpaw knockout chart and seven UFC fights against Nascimento's one-fight 155 booking after a welterweight debut — with Sadykhov's two-fight KO skid as the live reversal.
What limits this estimate
Nazim Sadykhov: Use the southpaw output before the fight becomes a measuring contest he can lose in one punch, the way Camilo ended it. 4.69 SLpM and the Motta knockout are the case. 72% takedown defence matters only if Nascimento decides to wrestle — he did not, in his debut.
Jefferson Nascimento: Stay at the end of the 70-inch reach, make Sadykhov lead, and do not volunteer the pocket that has been stopping Sadykhov. A decision is a live win. His debut almost was one. The weight cut back to 155 is the unknown, not a proven advantage.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Yanez's 5.96 SLpM and Garbrandt knockout against Díaz's 5.50 TD/15 and Wellmaker choke — 30 feet for the boxer, fence for the wrestler.
What limits this estimate
Adrian Yanez: Keep it at the end of the 70-inch reach in a 30-foot cage, land the combination that stopped Garbrandt and Salvador, and stuff the shot at something like the 75% he has posted. He has no submission game on the rate line. The win is strikes or a decision built on strikes.
Juan Díaz: Make it the Wellmaker fight. Five takedowns and a rear-naked choke do not require him to out-point 5.96 SLpM. The spinning elbow is on the Contender Series log. It is not the UFC win.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Wonderboy's +3" reach and karate in a 30-foot cage against a wrestler on a two-fight streak — style bet on a 43-year-old who has lost three in a row since December 2022.
What limits this estimate
Stephen Thompson: Use the 75-inch reach and the 30-foot cage, land the karate side kick, and do not accept the fence cycles that decided Bonfim and Buckley. Three rounds means he does not get the fifth he used to have. He also does not need it if the fight stays upright. His submission rate is 0.0. The win is strikes or a decision.
Charles Radtke: Wrestle early, the way the Prado and Frunza fights were won, and do not stand in the pocket that Malott ended in 26 seconds. A rear-naked choke is on the log. A boring decision on top also wins.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Southpaw finisher on two straight knockouts against a grappler whose last fight was a Moicano rear-naked choke loss — Torres is a Dober loss, not a misleading Win.
What limits this estimate
Drew Dober: Southpaw left hand, the punch that stopped Johnson, and do not shoot. 16% takedown accuracy is not a weapon. 58% takedown defence has to be good enough that Duncan cannot live on top the way he did against McKinney. The wins are knockouts. Believe that.
Chris Duncan: Wrestle. 2.92 TD/15 is the edge the striking table does not show. The anaconda of McKinney is the finish. The Moicano loss is the warning: a better submission fighter can reverse that script in round two.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
McKinney's first-round clock against Miller's guillotine at 43. Close once early like Nelson, or give the neck like Gordon and the upset is live.
What limits this estimate
Jim Miller: Force the shot, or wait for it, and lock the guillotine he has now finished people with. He does not need to win a striking round. He needs the mistake. Hooper is the version where the wrestler is careful and the fifteen minutes go the other way. McKinney has not been that wrestler.
Terrance McKinney: Start the way the Nelson fight started. 6.83 SLpM and a switch stance against a 43-year-old who lands 2.92 is the minute that matters. If Miller catches a kick and looks for the guillotine, that is the Duncan risk. Do not hang the neck out the way Gordon did, and do not let a scramble become bottom position.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Six inches and 5.74 SLpM against a southpaw who finished the same McConico two rounds earlier — size vs defensive striking.
What limits this estimate
Baisangur Susurkaev: Use the 79-inch reach and the 5.74 SLpM, make Johnson cover six inches of height, and look for the choke that ended Santos and Nolan. The McConico knockout took until round three. Do not assume a first-round finish. The log does not have one on the roster.
Donte Johnson: Southpaw counter, stay at the end of his own 74 inches, and do not get stuck under a man who out-landed Santos 107-78. The Brundage split decision is the path if the knockout is not there. The Dumas guillotine is the finish if a neck appears. His defensive striking is the real edge. His size is not.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Tactical key
Mesquita's three UFC submissions and 3.6 Sub/15 against Chiasson's +7" height — Pérez already took her down six times.
What limits this estimate
Macy Chiasson: Stay at the end of the 72-inch reach in a 30-foot cage, stuff the first layer, and turn it into the kind of fight her chart says she can win by knockout or decision. If Pérez's six takedowns happen again, the reach never enters the fight. 62% takedown defence is the number that has to show up.
Bia Mesquita: Close the seven inches, complete the shot at anything like 75%, and find the armbar or the rear-naked choke she has used in all three UFC wins. She does not need to out-point Chiasson for fifteen minutes. Mullins out-landed her 10-3 and still tapped.
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Reference quote: —
Edge vs no-vig market: —
Insufficient price data
Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.
Deep Dive
The announced UFC 334 card, both championship fights, and the editorial win estimates on this page.
The Story
UFC 334 puts two championship fights in the same building. Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) meets unbeaten Josh Hokit (10-0, #10) over five rounds for the heavyweight belt. The co-main is five rounds at 135: Kayla Harrison (19-1, #1) against Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked) for the women's bantamweight championship.
The rest of the main card is Gurule–Hasan at flyweight, Borralho–Belgaroui at middleweight, and Medic–Holland at welterweight. Seven prelims follow, including Sadykhov–Nascimento booked at 155 even though Nascimento is ranked at welterweight. Editorial win estimates are published for each bout. The main card is listed for 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+.

Main Event — Heavyweight Title
01Gane vs. Hokit
UFC Heavyweight Championship. Ranked #2 Ciryl Gane (14-2) meets unbeaten #10 Josh Hokit (10-0) over five rounds at 265. Editorial estimate: Gane 64%, Hokit 36%.
Full breakdown

Co-Main — Women's Bantamweight Title
02Harrison vs. Nunes
Five rounds at 135 for the women's bantamweight belt. Kayla Harrison is 19-1 and ranked #1. Amanda Nunes is 23-5 and unranked on this card. Editorial estimate: Harrison 63%, Nunes 37%.
Full breakdown

Main Card — Middleweight
03Borralho vs. Belgaroui
Caio Borralho (18-2, #5) meets Yousri Belgaroui (11-3, #33) at 185 over three rounds.
Full breakdown

Main Card — Welterweight
04Medic vs. Holland
Uros Medic (14-3, #12) meets Kevin Holland (29-15, #13) at 170. Adjacent welterweight rankings on the main card. Editorial estimate: Medic 57%, Holland 43%.
Full breakdown
UFC 334: Gane vs. Hokit is a numbered UFC event on Saturday, November 14, 2026 at Madison Square Garden in New York City, New York, with twelve bouts announced and two championship fights. The five-round heavyweight main event for the UFC Heavyweight Championship is Ciryl Gane (14-2, ranked #2) vs. Josh Hokit (10-0, ranked #10). The five-round co-main is the UFC Women's Bantamweight Championship: Kayla Harrison (19-1, ranked #1) vs. Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked). Main card, three rounds: Luis Gurule (11-4, #37) vs. Bilal Hasan (10-0, #39) at flyweight; Caio Borralho (18-2, #5) vs. Yousri Belgaroui (11-3, #33) at middleweight; Uros Medic (14-3, #12) vs. Kevin Holland (29-15, #13) at welterweight. Prelims: Nazim Sadykhov (11-3-1, #44 lightweight) vs. Jefferson Nascimento (13-1, #71 welterweight) booked at 155; Adrian Yanez (18-6-1, #24) vs. Juan Díaz (16-1-1, #52) at bantamweight; Stephen Thompson (17-9-1, #33) vs. Charles Radtke (12-5, #38) at welterweight; Drew Dober (29-15, #34) vs. Chris Duncan (15-3, #36) at lightweight; Jim Miller (39-19, #17) vs. Terrance McKinney (18-9, #37) at lightweight; Baisangur Susurkaev (12-0, #38) vs. Donte Johnson (9-0, #41) at middleweight; Macy Chiasson (11-6, #10) vs. Bia Mesquita (8-0, #12) at women's bantamweight. Editorial win estimates are published for all twelve bouts. The card streams on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET (2:00 PM PT).
UFC 334 streams live from Madison Square Garden in New York City on Saturday, November 14, 2026, with the main card beginning at 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+. Local New York time is 5:00 PM ET. The United States has already fallen back to standard time, so that is 2:00 PM PT, 10:00 PM GMT in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 11:00 PM CET in Central Europe, and 2:00 AM Gulf Standard Time on Sunday in Abu Dhabi. Prelims begin earlier the same day, also on Paramount+. All listed times follow the supplied card listing and remain subject to broadcast changes.
Heavyweight championship, five rounds: Ciryl Gane (14-2, #2) vs. Josh Hokit (10-0, #10). Women's bantamweight championship, five rounds: Kayla Harrison (19-1, #1) vs. Amanda Nunes (23-5, unranked). Main card: Luis Gurule (11-4, #37) vs. Bilal Hasan (10-0, #39) at flyweight; Caio Borralho (18-2, #5) vs. Yousri Belgaroui (11-3, #33) at middleweight; Uros Medic (14-3, #12) vs. Kevin Holland (29-15, #13) at welterweight. Prelims: Nazim Sadykhov (11-3-1, #44) vs. Jefferson Nascimento (13-1, #71) at 155; Adrian Yanez (18-6-1, #24) vs. Juan Díaz (16-1-1, #52) at bantamweight; Stephen Thompson (17-9-1, #33) vs. Charles Radtke (12-5, #38) at welterweight; Drew Dober (29-15, #34) vs. Chris Duncan (15-3, #36) at lightweight; Jim Miller (39-19, #17) vs. Terrance McKinney (18-9, #37) at lightweight; Baisangur Susurkaev (12-0, #38) vs. Donte Johnson (9-0, #41) at middleweight; Macy Chiasson (11-6, #10) vs. Bia Mesquita (8-0, #12) at women's bantamweight.
The editorial estimate is Ciryl Gane 64% and Josh Hokit 36% for the heavyweight championship, conviction 6 of 10, and Kayla Harrison 63% and Amanda Nunes 37% for the women's bantamweight championship. BetOnline on September 22, 2026 was Gane −280 / Hokit +232 and Harrison −200 / Nunes +169. Fair prices from those editorial splits are about −178/+178 and −170/+170. Every other bout has an editorial split and no BetOnline price. These are analyst estimates, not a calibrated model.
Yes. Ciryl Gane (#2) vs. Josh Hokit (#10) is the five-round UFC Heavyweight Championship main event at Madison Square Garden on November 14, 2026. Kayla Harrison (#1) vs. Amanda Nunes (unranked) is the five-round UFC Women's Bantamweight Championship co-main. Ten more bouts complete a twelve-fight card. All twelve stream on Paramount+. Card order follows the announced bout order and remains subject to change.
UFC experience describes the size of the available sample, not the chance of winning. A short UFC record leaves more uncertainty about how a fighter performs against different styles. Opponent quality, recent changes and missing statistics also matter; five bouts alone do not establish that a prediction is well calibrated.
Limited UFC sample
<3 UFC Bouts
Limited UFC data available. Analysis relies more heavily on external sources and pre-UFC performance patterns.
Developing UFC sample
3-4 UFC Bouts
Some UFC evidence is available, but a few matchups can strongly influence the averages. Check opponent quality and the limitations in each analysis.
Established UFC sample
5+ UFC Bouts
More UFC observations are available. This does not guarantee predictive accuracy; changes in opposition, injuries and style can still limit the estimate.
Note: All fights receive thorough analysis regardless of UFC experience levels. Analyst conviction is an editorial assessment, not a measured probability or statistical confidence interval.
Yellow marks our forecast favorite. The comparison shows our editorial win estimate against the probability implied by each quote. Gap is in percentage points (pp), includes bookmaker margin, and is not expected return.
| Fight | Fighter A | Win estimate A | Market / implied A | Fighter B | Win estimate B | Market / implied B | Model / market & our read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gane vs Hokit🟡 | Ciryl GaneAnalyst favorite | 64% | -280 (BetOnline)73.7% implied | Josh Hokit | 36% | +232 (BetOnline)30.1% implied | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapCiryl Gane64%73.7%-9.7 ppJosh Hokit36%30.1%+5.9 pp Our read: We favor Ciryl Gane. Josh Hokit offers the positive price gap, despite not being our outright pick. Quote dates unverified · recheck prices Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Harrison vs Nunes🟡 | Kayla HarrisonAnalyst favorite | 63% | -200 (BetOnline)66.7% implied | Amanda Nunes | 37% | +169 (BetOnline)37.2% implied | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapKayla Harrison63%66.7%-3.7 ppAmanda Nunes37%37.2%-0.2 pp Our read: We favor Kayla Harrison. Neither quote offers a meaningful positive gap against our estimate. Quote dates unverified · recheck prices Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Gurule vs Hasan🔴 | Luis Gurule | 42% | N/A— | Bilal HasanAnalyst favorite | 58% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapLuis Gurule42%——Bilal Hasan58%—— Our read: We favor Bilal Hasan. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Borralho vs Belgaroui🟡 | Caio BorralhoAnalyst favorite | 55% | N/A— | Yousri Belgaroui | 45% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapCaio Borralho55%——Yousri Belgaroui45%—— Our read: We narrowly lean Caio Borralho. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Medic vs Holland🟢 | Uros MedicAnalyst favorite | 57% | N/A— | Kevin Holland | 43% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapUros Medic57%——Kevin Holland43%—— Our read: We favor Uros Medic. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Sadykhov vs Nascimento🔴 | Nazim SadykhovAnalyst favorite | 58% | N/A— | Jefferson Nascimento | 42% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapNazim Sadykhov58%——Jefferson Nascimento42%—— Our read: We favor Nazim Sadykhov. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Yanez vs Díaz🔴 | Adrian YanezAnalyst favorite | 60% | N/A— | Juan Díaz | 40% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapAdrian Yanez60%——Juan Díaz40%—— Our read: We favor Adrian Yanez. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Thompson vs Radtke🟢 | Stephen ThompsonAnalyst favorite | 57% | N/A— | Charles Radtke | 43% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapStephen Thompson57%——Charles Radtke43%—— Our read: We favor Stephen Thompson. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Dober vs Duncan🟢 | Drew DoberAnalyst favorite | 54% | N/A— | Chris Duncan | 46% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapDrew Dober54%——Chris Duncan46%—— Our read: We narrowly lean Drew Dober. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Miller vs McKinney🟢 | Jim Miller | 44% | N/A— | Terrance McKinneyAnalyst favorite | 56% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapJim Miller44%——Terrance McKinney56%—— Our read: We favor Terrance McKinney. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Susurkaev vs Johnson🟡 | Baisangur SusurkaevAnalyst favorite | 60% | N/A— | Donte Johnson | 40% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapBaisangur Susurkaev60%——Donte Johnson40%—— Our read: We favor Baisangur Susurkaev. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |
| Chiasson vs Mesquita🟡 | Macy Chiasson | 42% | N/A— | Bia MesquitaAnalyst favorite | 58% | N/A— | Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapMacy Chiasson42%——Bia Mesquita58%—— Our read: We favor Bia Mesquita. A market price is needed to assess value. Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model |