UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan

Halloween at the small cage. On Saturday, October 31, the Meta APEX hosts five lightweight rounds: Renato Moicano (21-7-1, #9) against Tom Nolan (11-1, #29). The other main-card bout is Yana Santos (#6) vs. Luana Santos (#7) at women's bantamweight. Editorial estimate: Luana Santos 55%, Yana Santos 45%. Live on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM PT.

UFC Fight Night Moicano vs Nolan official poster — Meta APEX, Las Vegas, October 31, 2026
Saturday, October 31, 2026
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Meta APEX
⚡ Upcoming Event10 Fights
Main Card: Paramount+
Prelims: Paramount+
Start Time: 5:00 PM ET
Start Time by Timezone
Main-card time as listed. Prelims start earlier the same day. Subject to change.
ET
Eastern US/Canada
Main Card
5:00 PM
PT
Pacific US/Canada (Local)
Main Card
2:00 PM
GMT
United Kingdom / Ireland
Main Card
9:00 PM
CET
Central Europe
Main Card
10:00 PM
GST
Abu Dhabi, UAE
Main Card
1:00 AM (Sun)
Free newsletter

Get picks for this card

🥊

UFC Vegas: #9 Moicano vs. #29 Nolan in the 25-Foot Cage

Nine fights at the Meta APEX. Renato Moicano (21-7-1, #9) meets Tom Nolan (11-1, #29) over five rounds at 155. Yana Santos (#6) vs. Luana Santos (#7) is the other main-card bout.

Main card: Santos vs. Santos9 fights25-ft cage📺 Paramount+🕒 5:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM PTFull preview & FAQ ↓

UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan Fights, Analytics & Predictions

💡

BetOnline is our preferred reference when available. We show the selected source and implied probability; this is not a guarantee of the best price across all books. Check the capture date before treating an estimated edge as current.

Lightweight · 5 rounds

How to read these filters

Market differences are not a ranking of best bets. Conviction is editorial; a close matchup does not automatically mean poor data.

Fights shown: 10/10 · Analyses available: 9/10

Main Card

🏆 Main eventEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)20 / 6 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Renato Moicano

Renato Moicano

“Money”

21-7-1

Lightweight
5 Rounds

Editorial estimate

60%VS40%
Tom Nolan

Tom Nolan

11-1-0

Tactical key

A 25-foot cage shortens a four-inch height edge. Moicano wins if fence sequences become the rear-naked choke that accounts for 11 of his wins. Nolan wins if the 0.54 knockdown rate lands before that fence.

Renato Moicano

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.67
Reference quote—

Tom Nolan

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.50
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 6/10

What limits this estimate

  • Nolan is 6'3", 26, and on a five-fight streak that includes Ziam.
  • 0.54 knockdowns per 15 minutes, and Moicano has been finished before.
  • Nolan's only loss was a 63-second knockout, so the chin is unanswered rather than proven.

Renato Moicano: Close the four-inch height gap on the fence and turn it into the rear-naked choke that has produced 11 wins.

Tom Nolan: Land the 0.54 knockdown rate before the fence, or steal minutes at length the way the Ziam fight stayed upright.

Renato Moicano

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Tom Nolan

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Main CardEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)12 / 7 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Yana Santos

Yana Santos

“Foxy”

17-8-0

Women's Bantamweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

45%VS55%

Tactical key

Clinch kicks and volume versus judo throws and submission rate. Same height, adjacent ranks (#6 vs #7), ten years between them. Luana 55 / Yana 45.

Yana Santos

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.22
Reference quote—

Luana Santos

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.82
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • 4.41 SLpM at 57% accuracy, and a 39% clinch share she is comfortable in
  • Three straight wins over Chiasson, Tate and Chandler
  • Twelve UFC bouts against seven

Yana Santos: Keep the clinch as a striking phase, not a throwing phase. Land the 4.41 per minute, use the extra inch of reach, and make Luana win minutes she would rather spend on a throw.

Luana Santos: Turn 51% takedown defence into the mat, threaten the keylock and the choke that beat Lisboa and Agapova, and do not spend three rounds in a kickboxing clinch at 2.53 SLpM.

Yana Santos

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Luana Santos

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
Main CardUFC sample awaiting verification— / — UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Women's Strawweight
3 Rounds

Model estimate

Not assessed

Model forecast pending. A current matchup estimate is required before publishing win probabilities, fair odds or expected value. No betting edge is established for this preview.

Uncertainty & price details

A current matchup estimate is required before publishing win probabilities, fair odds or expected value. No betting edge is established for this preview.

Piera Rodriguez

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
—
Reference quote—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

Talita Alencar

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
—
Reference quote—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

Quotes older than 48 hours are marked outdated. EV at an old or undated price is a historical calculation, not a current opportunity. Date-only snapshots have no verified capture time.

View fight preview

Prelims

PrelimsDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)18 / 3 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Julian Erosa

Julian Erosa

“Juicy J”

31-13-0

Featherweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

57%VS43%

Tactical key

First-round chaos and finishing equity versus lower absorption and a younger chin question. Erosa 57 / Lee 43 — conviction capped because the favorite was knocked out in March.

Julian Erosa

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.75
Reference quote—

Jeong Yeong Lee

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.33
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Erosa was knocked out by Douglas in March and loses by knockout often
  • 6.31 absorbed against 3.82
  • Age 30 against 37

Julian Erosa: Force a first-round scramble. Guillotine or strikes — the Rodriguez/Ramos/Elkins window — before a younger man can make it a clean kickboxing round.

Jeong Yeong Lee: Survive round one, use 72% takedown defence and the lower absorption, and steal a decision the way Santos just did to him — which means he has to be better than he was in that fight.

Julian Erosa

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Jeong Yeong Lee

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsEstablished UFC sample (5+ bouts each)5 / 7 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Gaston Bolaños

Gaston Bolaños

“The Dreamkiller”

9-5-0

Featherweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

40%VS60%
Francis Marshall

Francis Marshall

“Fire”

10-3-0

Tactical key

Muay Thai accuracy versus wrestling and five rear-naked chokes in a 25-foot cage. Marshall 60 / Bolaños 40.

Gaston Bolaños

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.50
Reference quote—

Francis Marshall

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.67
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 5/10

What limits this estimate

  • 47% accuracy against 34%
  • A Muay Thai résumé and six career knockouts
  • Three UFC decision wins, including Aswell in June

Gaston Bolaños: Stuff the first layer, make Marshall strike at 34% accuracy, and win the kind of decision he has already won three times in the UFC.

Francis Marshall: Shoot early in the small cage, chain to the back, and look for the same rear-naked choke that beat Silva and that Le used on Bolaños. Do not spend the round missing 66% of his strikes at kicking range.

Gaston Bolaños

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Francis Marshall

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsDeveloping UFC sample (3–4 bouts)13 / 4 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Middleweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

55%VS45%

Tactical key

Cleaner wrestling and 1.2 Sub/15 versus round-one knockout power and a 31% striking defence. Petroski 55 / Bekoev 45 — both on skids.

Andre Petroski

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.82
Reference quote—

Azamat Bekoev

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.22
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Petroski is 0-3, and two of those losses are early knockouts
  • Bekoev's two UFC wins are both round-one knockouts
  • Bekoev is five years younger and lands more per minute

Andre Petroski: Get the shot in before the counter lands. 86% takedown defence blunts Bekoev's 3.48 rate. 1.2 Sub/15 is the finish if the neck is there the way it was for Maximov. A decision is the other win — Vieira and Budka — if the choke is not there.

Azamat Bekoev: Keep it standing for the first two minutes. Petroski's last two knockout losses were over before a wrestling round existed. 4.57 SLpM and the Loder/Reese knockouts are the argument. Do not spend the fight in a body lock at 0.0 Sub/15.

Andre Petroski

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Azamat Bekoev

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)4 / 0 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Women's Bantamweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

38%VS62%

Tactical key

Szabová brings a 12-0 Oktagon résumé and recent finishes into a 25-foot cage; Lisboa owns the only UFC rate line, and it is a 2-2 sample with two late finishes against her. The lean is the undefeated debutante — conviction stays low because her Octagon sample is empty.

Tainara Lisboa

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.63
Reference quote—

Lucia Szabová

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.61
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Szabová has zero UFC fights — the rate line does not exist
  • Lisboa has already won and lost in this cage
  • Her losses were late, not blowouts in the first minute

Tainara Lisboa: Make it ugly and long enough that a debutante's first Octagon night becomes a decision. 1.67 TD/15 is the tool, even at 31% accuracy. Clark choke in round three and Oliveira decision are the only UFC win templates.

Lucia Szabová: Use the judo base and the finishing habit that stopped Bolander, Faria and Fernandes. Do not assume a five-round pace — Pudilová was five rounds; this is three.

Tainara Lisboa

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Lucia Szabová

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)2 / 0 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Middleweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

44%VS56%

Tactical key

Klein owns 5.79 TD/15 and two UFC roster nights — both knockout losses behind 39% striking defence. Kropschot is two inches longer with a one-night Contender Series decision at 7.93 SLpM and zero roster bouts. The lean is the longer man; conviction stays at 3.

Nick Klein

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.27
Reference quote—

Joe Kropschot

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.79
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 3/10

What limits this estimate

  • Kropschot has zero UFC roster fights — 7.93 SLpM is one night
  • Klein's 5.79 TD/15 and 1.9 Sub/15 are real tools in a 25-foot cage
  • A regional 9-3 record is not an Octagon rate line

Nick Klein: Turn it into the Souza fight or a decision built on 5.79 TD/15. He cannot win a kickboxing match at 2.51 SLpM behind 39% defence.

Joe Kropschot: Stay at the end of the 79-inch reach, jab and teep the Kunneman way, and do not volunteer the clinch Klein wants. Stuff enough of the 35% shots. Armbar is a bonus.

Nick Klein

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Joe Kropschot

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)2 / 1 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani

Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani

“JPL”

11-2-0

Welterweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

57%VS43%

Tactical key

Lebosnoyani is 2-0 on the roster with 4.14 SLpM and 100% takedown defence on a three-fight line. Hasanov is 6-0 after landing 17 takedowns in one night against Eric Nolan. The lean is the man with two UFC wins; seventeen takedowns is why it stays close.

Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.75
Reference quote—

Farman Hasanov

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.33
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 4/10

What limits this estimate

  • Seventeen takedowns in his only UFC fight is not a normal wrestling rate, and it is still what he did
  • +2" reach, 70% defence and 1.00 SApM on that night
  • Lebosnoyani's Ko win came with a significant-strike deficit

Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani: Stuff the first takedown, use the switch stance and 4.14 SLpM, and let Hasanov's 1.40 output lose a fifteen-minute fight. Submission attempts against Ko and Rowe are the finish branch. 100% takedown defence is the number he has to keep.

Farman Hasanov: Make it the Nolan fight. Seventeen takedowns is not the target — even five in a 25-foot cage buries a volume edge. He does not need to submit anyone. His UFC sub rate is 0.0. The decision is the win.

Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Farman Hasanov

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
PrelimsLimited UFC sample (<3 bouts)1 / 1 UFC boutsCounts follow fighter order. The smaller UFC sample determines the color: under 3 red, 3–4 yellow, 5+ green. Sample size is not a win probability or a measure of analysis quality.
Welterweight
3 Rounds

Editorial estimate

55%VS45%

Tactical key

Both men own one UFC loss to Daniil Donchenko. Sezinando brings a compiled finish chart (4 KO / 3 Dec / 2 Sub) and a takedown attempt; Berggren brings +4" reach and a loss that reached round two. Two one-fight samples do not make a strong favorite.

Rodrigo Sezinando

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
1.82
Reference quote—

Theodor Berggren

Insufficient price data
Estimated EV
—
Fair decimal odds
2.22
Reference quote—
Uncertainty & price details Analyst conviction: 3/10

What limits this estimate

  • +4" reach, +2" height, switch stance, younger
  • Sezinando's only UFC line is 27% accuracy and 8.76 absorbed
  • Berggren's only UFC line is also bad, and it lasted longer

Rodrigo Sezinando: Get inside the 75-inch reach, use the level change he showed even while losing, and look for the rear-naked choke that accounts for both listed submission wins. A kickboxing fight at 2.25 SLpM and 27% accuracy is how the final ended.

Theodor Berggren: Stay long, switch, and do not let a shorter man turn the fence into a takedown. His UFC takedown count is zero. The win is a striking win — which is also how he lost the only fight on his page, 23-71.

Rodrigo Sezinando

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Theodor Berggren

Reference quote: —

Edge vs no-vig market: —

Insufficient price data

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Read full analysis
The Meta APEX in Las Vegas uses the smaller 25-foot cage, which compresses distance and favors pressure over out-fighting. Nine bouts are on the announced card; each fight box links to a preview page.

Deep Dive

Event Preview, FAQ & Methodology

The announced Moicano vs. Nolan card, the questions readers ask, and the editorial win estimates on this page.

🥊

The Story

UFC Vegas: #9 Moicano vs. #29 Nolan in the 25-Foot Cage

📍 Meta APEX, Las Vegas🗓 Saturday, October 31, 2026📺 Paramount+

This is a nine-fight APEX card with a ranked lightweight main event and a ranked women's bantamweight bout sharing the main card. Renato Moicano (21-7-1, #9) meets Tom Nolan (11-1, #29) over five rounds at 155. The other main-card fight is Yana Santos (17-8, #6) vs. Luana Santos (11-2, #7) at 135.

The preliminary card runs seven three-round bouts: Erosa–Lee and Bolaños–Marshall at featherweight, Petroski–Bekoev and Klein–Kropschot at middleweight, Lisboa–Szabová at women's bantamweight, and Lebosnoyani–Hasanov plus Sezinando–Berggren at welterweight. Editorial win estimates are published for each bout. The cage is the 25-foot APEX Octagon, and the main card is listed for 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+.

🥊

What is UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan?

UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan is a UFC Vegas Fight Night on Saturday, October 31, 2026 at the Meta APEX in Las Vegas, Nevada, inside the 25-foot cage, with ten bouts announced. The five-round lightweight main event is Renato Moicano (21-7-1, ranked #9) vs. Tom Nolan (11-1, ranked #29). The main card also has Yana Santos (17-8, ranked #6) vs. Luana Santos (11-2, ranked #7) at women's bantamweight over three rounds, and Piera Rodriguez (12-2, #19) vs. Talita Alencar (8-1-1, #21) at women's strawweight. Prelims: Julian Erosa (31-14, #20) vs. Jeong Yeong Lee (11-3, #65) and Gaston Bolaños (9-5, #61) vs. Francis Marshall (10-3, #51) at featherweight; Andre Petroski (13-6, #56) vs. Azamat Bekoev (20-5, #57) and Nick Klein (6-3, #76) vs. Joe Kropschot (9-3, unranked) at middleweight; Tainara Lisboa (7-4, #25) vs. Lucia Szabová (12-0, unranked) at women's bantamweight; Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani (11-2, #45) vs. Farman Hasanov (6-0, #58) and Rodrigo Sezinando (9-2, #68) vs. Theodor Berggren (8-4, #72) at welterweight. Editorial win estimates are published for the previously announced bouts. The Rodriguez–Alencar addition does not have a win probability yet. The card streams on Paramount+ at 5:00 PM ET (2:00 PM PT).

🕒

When is UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan and what time does it start?

UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan streams live from the Meta APEX in Las Vegas, Nevada on Saturday, October 31, 2026, with the main card beginning at 5:00 PM ET on Paramount+. Local Las Vegas time is 2:00 PM PT. The United States is still on daylight time that Saturday. The United Kingdom and Ireland, already on GMT, tune in at 9:00 PM. Central Europe is on CET at 10:00 PM, and Abu Dhabi is at 1:00 AM Gulf Standard Time on Sunday. Prelims begin earlier the same day, also on Paramount+. All listed times follow the supplied card listing and remain subject to broadcast changes.

📋

Who is fighting at UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan?

Main event, lightweight, five rounds: Renato Moicano (21-7-1, #9) vs. Tom Nolan (11-1, #29). Main card, women's bantamweight, three rounds: Yana Santos (17-8, #6) vs. Luana Santos (11-2, #7). Main card, women's strawweight, three rounds: Piera Rodriguez (12-2, #19) vs. Talita Alencar (8-1-1, #21). Prelims: Julian Erosa (31-14, #20) vs. Jeong Yeong Lee (11-3, #65) at featherweight; Gaston Bolaños (9-5, #61) vs. Francis Marshall (10-3, #51) at featherweight; Andre Petroski (13-6, #56) vs. Azamat Bekoev (20-5, #57) at middleweight; Tainara Lisboa (7-4, #25) vs. Lucia Szabová (12-0, unranked) at women's bantamweight; Nick Klein (6-3, #76) vs. Joe Kropschot (9-3, unranked) at middleweight; Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani (11-2, #45) vs. Farman Hasanov (6-0, #58) at welterweight; Rodrigo Sezinando (9-2, #68) vs. Theodor Berggren (8-4, #72) at welterweight.

🤖

Who does the MMA Analytics model favor in Moicano vs. Nolan?

The editorial estimate for the main event is Renato Moicano 60% and Tom Nolan 40%, conviction 6 of 10. Yana Santos is 45% and Luana Santos is 55%. Every other bout on the card has its own editorial split in the model table and on the fight page. These are analyst estimates, not a calibrated model. No BetOnline price was posted for this card on September 22, 2026.

⚠️

Is the Moicano vs. Nolan main event confirmed?

Yes. Renato Moicano (#9) vs. Tom Nolan (#29) is the five-round lightweight main event at the Meta APEX in Las Vegas on October 31, 2026. Yana Santos (#6) vs. Luana Santos (#7) is the other main-card bout, at women's bantamweight. Seven preliminary bouts complete a nine-fight card in the 25-foot cage. All nine stream on Paramount+. Card order follows the announced bout order and remains subject to change.

📊Analysis Reliability Framework

UFC experience describes the size of the available sample, not the chance of winning. A short UFC record leaves more uncertainty about how a fighter performs against different styles. Opponent quality, recent changes and missing statistics also matter; five bouts alone do not establish that a prediction is well calibrated.

🔴

Limited UFC sample

<3 UFC Bouts

Limited UFC data available. Analysis relies more heavily on external sources and pre-UFC performance patterns.

🟡

Developing UFC sample

3-4 UFC Bouts

Some UFC evidence is available, but a few matchups can strongly influence the averages. Check opponent quality and the limitations in each analysis.

🟢

Established UFC sample

5+ UFC Bouts

More UFC observations are available. This does not guarantee predictive accuracy; changes in opposition, injuries and style can still limit the estimate.

Note: All fights receive thorough analysis regardless of UFC experience levels. Analyst conviction is an editorial assessment, not a measured probability or statistical confidence interval.

Model vs market

Yellow marks our forecast favorite. The comparison shows our editorial win estimate against the probability implied by each quote. Gap is in percentage points (pp), includes bookmaker margin, and is not expected return.

Fighter AWin estimate AMarket / implied AFighter BWin estimate BMarket / implied BModel / market & our read
Renato MoicanoAnalyst favorite60%N/A—Tom Nolan40%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapRenato Moicano60%——Tom Nolan40%——

Our read: We favor Renato Moicano. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Yana Santos45%N/A—Luana SantosAnalyst favorite55%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapYana Santos45%——Luana Santos55%——

Our read: We narrowly lean Luana Santos. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Piera Rodriguez—N/A—Talita Alencar—N/A—

Matchup under review

A numerical win estimate is not available yet, so we cannot assess the price gap.

Julian ErosaAnalyst favorite57%N/A—Jeong Yeong Lee43%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapJulian Erosa57%——Jeong Yeong Lee43%——

Our read: We favor Julian Erosa. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Gaston Bolaños40%N/A—Francis MarshallAnalyst favorite60%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapGaston Bolaños40%——Francis Marshall60%——

Our read: We favor Francis Marshall. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Andre PetroskiAnalyst favorite55%N/A—Azamat Bekoev45%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapAndre Petroski55%——Azamat Bekoev45%——

Our read: We narrowly lean Andre Petroski. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Tainara Lisboa38%N/A—Lucia SzabováAnalyst favorite62%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapTainara Lisboa38%——Lucia Szabová62%——

Our read: We favor Lucia Szabová. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Nick Klein44%N/A—Joe KropschotAnalyst favorite56%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapNick Klein44%——Joe Kropschot56%——

Our read: We favor Joe Kropschot. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Jean-Paul LebosnoyaniAnalyst favorite57%N/A—Farman Hasanov43%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapJean-Paul Lebosnoyani57%——Farman Hasanov43%——

Our read: We favor Jean-Paul Lebosnoyani. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Rodrigo SezinandoAnalyst favorite55%N/A—Theodor Berggren45%N/A—
Win probabilityAnalystMarketGapRodrigo Sezinando55%——Theodor Berggren45%——

Our read: We narrowly lean Rodrigo Sezinando. A market price is needed to assess value.

Analyst estimate · not a calibrated model

Event Discussion

No comments yet
Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.