Anthony Wint
- UFC profile pro record
- 8-0-0
- UFC bouts
- 1
- Career KO/TKO wins
- 5
- Career submission wins
- 2
Recent results listed by UFC
- W
Terrance Chatman
Submission · 8/22/26 · UFC Fight Night


A one-bout UFC sample meets a debutant
What this fight is really about — and the measurements that shape it
Wint's early UFC rates describe a brief successful performance, while Armand has no UFC rate sample. The useful comparison is how each responds when the first attack fails. Neither Wint's extreme defensive figures nor Armand's undefeated regional record establish that response.
Measurements as listed in UFC profiles reviewed 2026-09-10. Profile measurements are not official event weigh-in results.
Venue FactorScheduled for 3 five-minute rounds at Delta Center.
Careers, chins, schedules — and the form they bring into the cage
Terrance Chatman
Submission · 8/22/26 · UFC Fight Night
No completed UFC bouts. Regional experience is not a UFC statistical sample.
Published career statistics and the limits of the sample
Career aggregates describe past opposition. They are not an opponent-adjusted prediction of this fight. Rates for athletes with no completed UFC bouts are not shown.
| Metric | Anthony Wint | Lucas Armand |
|---|---|---|
| Significant strikes landed / min | 3.56 | Not available |
| Significant strikes absorbed / min | 0.2 | Not available |
| Striking accuracy | 67% | Not available |
| Striking defence | 83% | Not available |
| Takedowns / 15 min | 2.97 | Not available |
| Takedown defence | 100% | Not available |
| Submission attempts / 15 min | 2.97 | Not available |
| Knockdowns / 15 min | 0 | Not available |
Submission attempts are not submission wins. Defence percentages depend on attempts faced. Takedown accuracy remains unverified. Round observations are not available for this comparison.
Advantages, worst cases, gameplans — and the patterns underneath
Wint's early UFC rates describe a brief successful performance, while Armand has no UFC rate sample. The useful comparison is how each responds when the first attack fails. Neither Wint's extreme defensive figures nor Armand's undefeated regional record establish that response.
Use the first entry to establish position, add offence without sacrificing control and avoid assuming the previous fight will repeat.
Anthony Wint lands 3.56 significant strikes per minute and absorbs 0.2. Those figures describe previous exchanges; maintaining that balance requires controlling range against this opponent.
The published profile lists 2.97 takedowns and 2.97 submission attempts per 15 minutes. Position after the entry matters: an attempt rate does not measure damaging control or the chance of a finish.
Use the first entry to establish position, add offence without sacrificing control and avoid assuming the previous fight will repeat.
Prepare for Lucas Armand's opposing route: Defend the initial contact with balance intact, regain space before the next attack and make Wint work through a second phase.
Defend the initial contact with balance intact, regain space before the next attack and make Wint work through a second phase.
Lucas Armand has no completed UFC bouts. The proposed gameplan is a hypothesis to test, not a statistically established advantage.
Defend the initial contact with balance intact, regain space before the next attack and make Wint work through a second phase.
Prepare for Anthony Wint's opposing route: Use the first entry to establish position, add offence without sacrificing control and avoid assuming the previous fight will repeat.
The fight follows Lucas Armand's route: Defend the initial contact with balance intact, regain space before the next attack and make Wint work through a second phase.
Wint's near-perfect defensive numbers are a small-sample observation, while Armand's missing profile prevents a meaningful assessment of the matchup.
The fight follows Anthony Wint's route: Use the first entry to establish position, add offence without sacrificing control and avoid assuming the previous fight will repeat.
Anthony Wint has only 1 UFC bouts. One opponent or short finish can strongly influence these averages.
Wint's early UFC rates describe a brief successful performance, while Armand has no UFC rate sample. The useful comparison is how each responds when the first attack fails. Neither Wint's extreme defensive figures nor Armand's undefeated regional record establish that response.
Wint's near-perfect defensive numbers are a small-sample observation, while Armand's missing profile prevents a meaningful assessment of the matchup.
There is too little UFC exposure for a stable statistical ranking. Regional records and one successful appearance can frame questions, but cannot answer them on their own. Scheduled for 3 five-minute rounds at Heavyweight. Career rates do not establish how either fighter will perform at this specific distance or against this opponent.
Forecast status, the betting market, and the limits of the evidence
Editorial forecast
Wint has one UFC appearance and Armand has none. There is not enough verified comparative evidence to select a side responsibly from these profiles.
What could change it: Wint's near-perfect defensive numbers are a small-sample observation, while Armand's missing profile prevents a meaningful assessment of the matchup.
Qualitative analyst assessment; no calibrated win probability.
Wint has one UFC appearance and Armand has none. There is not enough verified comparative evidence to select a side responsibly from these profiles.
Wint's near-perfect defensive numbers are a small-sample observation, while Armand's missing profile prevents a meaningful assessment of the matchup.
There is too little UFC exposure for a stable statistical ranking. Regional records and one successful appearance can frame questions, but cannot answer them on their own.
Matchup assessment
There is too little UFC exposure for a stable statistical ranking. Regional records and one successful appearance can frame questions, but cannot answer them on their own.
This is a qualitative matchup analysis. No win probability, simulation, fair price or betting edge is assigned. A current market quote alone does not establish value.
Profiles reviewed 2026-09-10. The linked sources support the statistics; tactical conclusions are editorial interpretations.
Wint has one UFC appearance and Armand has none. There is not enough verified comparative evidence to select a side responsibly from these profiles.
The strongest objection is this: Wint's near-perfect defensive numbers are a small-sample observation, while Armand's missing profile prevents a meaningful assessment of the matchup.
There is too little UFC exposure for a stable statistical ranking. Regional records and one successful appearance can frame questions, but cannot answer them on their own. This editorial assessment does not assign a calibrated probability or a market price.