MarQuel Mederos vs Mason Jones
Lightweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues
Saturday, August 22, 2026 • Golden 1 Center, Sacramento
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
MarQuel Mederos
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Mason Jones
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - MarQuel Mederos
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 | Chris Padilla | D | Draw (Majority) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-06-07 | Mark Choinski | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-03-29 | Austin Hubbard | W | Decision (Split) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-02-03 | Landon Quiñones | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-10-10 | Issa Isakov | W | KO/TKO (Knee) (R1, 4:09) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Mason Jones
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Axel Sola | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-09-06 | Bolaji Oki | W | KO/TKO (Elbows) (R2, 3:18) |
| 2025-05-03 | Jeremy Stephens | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-07-25 | Michael Pagani | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-02-23 | Bryce Logan | W | KO/TKO (R2, 2:45) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Average of Striking Composite (58 vs 51) and Grappling Composite (31 vs 53) — all estimated (no database; both UFC samples are small). Balances striking effectiveness with grappling to measure complete technical skills. Mederos is elite in one phase (sharp, accurate striking) and empty in the other; Jones's edge is breadth — competent-to-strong in two phases where his opponent can only threaten standing.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 MarQuel Mederos Key Advantages
Mederos is the more accurate (58% vs 43%) and more powerful (0.47 KD vs 0.17) striker in the cage, and Jones is genuinely hittable — 51% striking defense, 4.45 absorbed per minute. Against a pressure fighter who walks forward and gets touched, a precise counter-puncher with real one-shot pop is a classic problem. Every time Jones over-commits on volume, Mederos has the timing and the power to make him pay with the cleaner shot — and it only takes one to rewrite a round. His hands are, honestly, the best single weapon in this matchup.
This is the pillar that makes the whole matchup competitive. Mederos's 83% takedown defense is the tool that can strand Jones's second phase on the launchpad. If the sprawl holds, Jones's wrestling and black-belt grappling never come online, the fight is forced into the pure striking match where Mederos's quality edge is most relevant, and the Welshman's biggest structural advantage evaporates. Mederos does not need to win the grappling — he only needs to prevent it, and an elite sprawl says he can.
A quarter of Mederos's significant strikes go to the legs (25% vs Jones's 8%). Systematically chopping Jones's lead leg is his best route to slowing the walk-down, shortening the 4.5-inch reach disadvantage, and banking clean scoring blows without standing in the pocket against the longer man. It is a patient, round-winning weapon tailor-made against a come-forward fighter — and one Jones, who invests almost nothing low, will not return in kind. Over three rounds a swollen lead leg is how the shorter fighter shrinks the distance war.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Jones's length and 5.98-SLpM volume keep Mederos fighting off the back foot all night; he throws second, lands his sharper shots too infrequently to offset the Welshman's output, and drops a clear, busy decision without ever being hurt. His superior accuracy matters less if he is countering at the end of Jones's jab, and his 53% striking defense and 4.58 absorbed per minute mean he loses the volume exchanges he is forced to trade in. This is the Welshman's single most repeatable path — the Stephens/Sola grind, applied to a shorter man.
Even if the 83% sprawl mostly holds, the takedown threat freezes Mederos's counters and buys Jones clinch time and control minutes that tilt close rounds on the cards. And the catastrophic version: one sprawl slips against a BJJ/judo black belt, Jones takes top position or the back, and Mederos — with zero grappling offense (0-for-12 on UFC takedowns) and no submission-defense pedigree tested at this level — spends a round surviving instead of scoring. He has never had to swim in that water.
📋 Likely Gameplan
The 83% sprawl is the whole plan's foundation. Stuff every takedown, stay off the fence, and deny Jones the grappling dimension entirely — if it stays a pure kickboxing match, Mederos's quality edge is live and the Welshman's biggest structural advantage is neutralized. The one thing Mederos must NOT do is get lazy with the hands forward against a black belt who mixes takedowns off strikes; the sprawl is his lifeline and it must be protected on every single exchange.
Lean on the 25%-to-legs habit — chop Jones's lead leg to slow the walk-down and shrink the reach gap, banking scoring blows without trading in the pocket. Then counter, don't chase: let Jones's volume and forward pressure create the openings and time the sharper, harder shot as he steps in. Accept a lower punch count and make what lands count — the Hubbard split is the template: win the clean exchanges, avoid the grind, keep the sprawl perfect, and edge close rounds on quality.
🚀 Mason Jones Key Advantages
Jones throws more (5.98 vs 5.46 SLpM), fights behind a 4.5-inch reach advantage, and applies constant forward pressure that turns opponents into reactive, busy versions of themselves. Over three rounds, the fighter who lands more and dictates where the fight happens wins more rounds — and Jones's entire game is built to out-work and walk down the shorter man. Mederos's superior accuracy matters less if he is throwing second, off his back foot, at the end of Jones's jab. This is the structural core of the favorite's edge.
Jones is a BJJ and judo black belt with a real takedown game (3.48/15, eleven landed) and three career submissions; Mederos has zero offensive grappling and zero submission threat. Even against an 83% sprawl, Jones only needs the threat of the takedown to freeze the counters, mix levels, and steal clinch and control time that wins close rounds. And the answer to Mederos's power: in twenty professional fights, across two Cage Warriors title runs and seven UFC bouts, Jones has never once been finished — both losses are old decisions. The chin Mederos most wants to crack has held every time.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Mederos's precision and leg kicks find a rhythm early; the lead leg swells, the forward pressure slows, and the sharper counters bank rounds while Jones's 43% accuracy sprays wide. If the reach and volume do not translate to control — no takedowns land, the clinch time never accrues — Mederos keeps it a clean, long-range striking match, wins the exchanges on quality, and steals a close decision exactly the way he beat Hubbard. The favorite's whole edge assumes he imposes the pace; a chopped base and a stuffed shot take that away.
Jones over-commits walking forward and eats one of the clean, hard counters his 51% striking defense invites — and even a chin that has never cracked in twenty fights can be dropped once, flipping a round or forcing a desperate scramble. Mederos's 0.47 knockdown rate and 58% accuracy are not a finishing guarantee against this durability, but they make every forward exchange a live risk. The pressure that wins Jones rounds is the same pressure that walks him onto the hardest single shot in the cage.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Use the 4.5-inch reach advantage to fight at his range, plant the jab where Mederos must step in to answer, and walk the shorter man to the fence — turning the fight into the busy, forward grind his volume wins. The one thing Jones must NOT do is stand and trade single power shots at mid-range where Mederos's accuracy and knockdown pop live; the plan is output and motion, not a firefight. Over fifteen minutes the busier, longer man wins more exchanges on the cards.
Level-change off combinations to freeze Mederos's counters, tax the sprawl, and rack up clinch and control time that wins close rounds even when the shot is stuffed at 83%. When Mederos plants to counter or throw the leg kick, that is the moment to shoot or clinch — turn his one-note distance game against him by changing the phase he is least equipped for. Then bury him under numbers: the Oki elbow shows the finish is there if he wilts, but the floor is a Stephens/Sola-style decision. Pressure, volume, control — let the pace compound.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics
Strip the fight to its load-bearing beams and it is a precision-versus-volume duel with a length twist. Mederos lands the sharper, harder, more accurate single shots (58% vs 43%, 0.47 KD vs 0.17) and owns the leg-kick game to chop the lead leg; Jones throws far more (5.98 vs 5.46 SLpM), fights behind a 4.5-inch reach edge, and applies the cage-cutting pressure that turns a technical striker into a busy one. Layer on the two-phase gap — Jones can win on the feet or the mat; Mederos can only win standing — and the fight becomes a race between Jones imposing a long-range, high-volume, multi-phase grind and Mederos keeping it a clean striking match where his power stays live.
🎯Technical Breakdown
All composites are estimated against public-knowledge lightweight baselines (no database; UFCStats was unreachable), and both UFC samples are small — Mederos 4 bouts, Jones 7. On the feet Mederos is the better marksman — 58% accuracy vs 43%, a real 0.47 knockdown rate vs 0.17 — but hittable (53% defense, 4.58 absorbed), giving a 58 striking composite to Jones's 51, whose elite 5.98 volume is undercut by a spraying 43% accuracy. In grappling the gap flips: Jones is two-directional (3.48 TD/15, 74% TDDef, black-belt subs) for a 53 composite, while Mederos's 31 is propped up entirely by an elite 83% sprawl and hollowed by zero offense (0-for-12). The honest read of the 44.5 vs 52.0 Technical Score: Mederos is elite in one phase, Jones competent-to-strong in two.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Three hinges decide it. First, the distance war — Jones's 74-inch reach and 5.98 volume against Mederos's counters and 25%-to-the-legs kick game; whoever wins the range battle dictates who initiates every exchange after. Second, the takedown battle — Jones's 3.48/15 and black-belt threat against Mederos's elite 83% sprawl; if the sprawl holds every round the grappling gap is neutralized, but one slip against a black belt changes the fight's character entirely. Third, the durability question — Mederos's 0.47 KD power against a chin never finished in twenty pro fights, which blunts his single best weapon and pushes his likeliest winning route back onto the scorecards, where two never-finished, ~13-minute fighters make a decision the overwhelming destination.
🏁Final Prediction
The most likely outcome is Mason Jones by Decision (35%) — the out-volume, out-pressure, out-length template he built over Stephens and Sola, applied to a durable, shorter opponent over fifteen minutes. Mederos's decision (25%) is his most likely winning route — win the distance war with leg kicks, bank the clean counters, keep the sprawl perfect, and edge close rounds on quality, exactly as he beat Hubbard. Mederos's KO/TKO (16%) is his most dangerous path and nearly his largest, capped only because Jones has never been finished. Jones's KO/TKO (15%) reflects real mid-round finishing (the Oki elbow), his submission (8%) the black-belt dimension Mederos cannot answer, and Mederos's submission (1%) is a near-null — he has no sub game at all.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 60% | Fair: -150
GOOD VALUE
Model: 92% | Fair: -1150
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 35% | Fair: +186
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Overprices the finish – The market lays -150 on inside-the-distance, leaning on both men's highlight reels; neither has ever been finished across 33 pro fights.
- • Underprices the decision – Two high-volume, never-finished distance fighters make +115 on Decision the board's single most mispriced number.
- • Length & volume tell on the cards – Jones's 74" reach and 5.98 SLpM make the busy decision his most repeatable path to victory.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - MarQuel Mederos
His likeliest winning route — leg kicks, clean counters, a perfect sprawl, close rounds edged the Hubbard way
His most dangerous path — 58% accuracy and 0.47 KD on a hittable opponent; capped only by a never-cracked chin
Near-null — zero career subs and no sub threat; only a freak scramble, nothing repeatable
💥Outcome Distribution - Mason Jones
Real mid-round finishing — the Oki elbow proves it, but Mederos's durability keeps it below his decision path
His single largest, most repeatable path — the Stephens/Sola out-volume, out-pressure fifteen-minute grind
The black-belt dimension — realized when a takedown lands and he advances to a finish Mederos cannot defend in kind
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - MarQuel Mederos
- • Land the counter: 58% accuracy and a 0.47 KD rate on a hittable (51% def) opponent.
- • Chop the legs: 25% to the legs slows the walk-down and shrinks the reach gap.
- • Sprawl perfect: stuff every entry and keep it a clean, long-range striking match.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Mason Jones
- • Own the range: a 74" reach and 5.98 SLpM dictate distance and activity.
- • Weaponize the shot: the takedown threat freezes counters; clinch and control bank rounds.
- • Out-volume late: the busier, longer man pulls away on the cards over fifteen minutes.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
A clear-but-moderate lean to the longer, busier, more complete fighter — capped by Mederos's sharper hands, an elite sprawl, and two thin UFC samples
✅Supporting Factors
- • Volume, length & pressure: 5.98 SLpM and a 4.5" reach edge win distance and activity round after round
- • The two-phase gap — Jones can win on the feet or the mat; Mederos can only win standing
- • Never finished in 20 pro fights — blunts Mederos's power and pushes it to the cards
- • Deeper résumé & fresher momentum — double CW champ, two UFC bonuses, 7-fight streak
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Mederos is the sharper, harder puncher (58% acc, 0.47 KD) vs a hittable 51% defense
- • The elite 83% sprawl can strand Jones's entire second phase and force a pure striking match
- • The leg-kick game (25% vs 8%) slows the pressure and shrinks the reach gap over three rounds
- • Both UFC samples are thin — Mederos 4 bouts, Jones 7 across two stints — real uncertainty
🏁Executive Summary
Across 100 simulations the recurring story is this: in roughly 58 of them, Mason Jones imposes his fight — most often (35) by out-voluming, out-pressuring and out-lengthing Mederos across fifteen busy minutes for the grinding decision he built over Stephens and Sola, with a smaller share by mid-round TKO (15) when the pressure and elbows tell as they did on Oki, or by submission (8) where his black-belt grappling finds the mat his opponent cannot defend in kind. In the other 42, MarQuel Mederos's precision and sprawl decide it — most often (25) by winning the distance war with leg kicks and clean counters, keeping the takedown defense perfect, and edging close rounds the way he beat Hubbard; less often (16) by landing the harder, sharper single shot his 58% accuracy and 0.47 knockdown rate make live; and almost never (1) on the mat, where he has no game at all. The longer, busier, more complete, never-finished fighter is Jones — but the sharper puncher with the leak-proof sprawl is exactly the kind of opponent who makes a favorite sweat.
Prediction: Mason Jones by Decision is the single most likely path (35%), with Mederos's decision (25%), Mederos's KO/TKO (16%) and Jones's own KO/TKO (15%) behind it, then Jones by submission (8%). If the Welshman keeps it a long-range, high-volume, two-phase grind, his reach, output and optionality win more rounds more often — but make no mistake, "The Dragon" is a deserved yet far-from-safe favorite against a live underdog whose hands can rewrite any exchange.