Ryan Gandra vs Zach Reese
Middleweight Bout • UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2
Saturday, July 11, 2026 • T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Ryan Gandra
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Zach Reese
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Ryan Gandra
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2026 | Jose Daniel Medina | W | KO/TKO (UFC debut) (R1, 0:41) |
| 2025 | Trent Miller (DWCS) | W | Contender Series win (—, —) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Zach Reese
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2026 | Michel Pereira | L | Decision (Split) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025 | Jackson McVey | W | SUB (Rear-Naked Choke) (R2, 1:38) |
| 2025 | Sedriques Dumas | NC | No Contest (Kick to Groin by Reese) (R1, 0:51) |
| 2025 | Dusko Todorovic | W | Decision (Unanimous, narrow) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025 | Azamat Bekoev | L | KO/TKO (Punches from Guard) (R1, 3:04) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Average of Striking Composite (55 vs 58) and Grappling Composite (50 vs 48) — Gandra vs Reese. These are explicitly-flagged reasoned estimates (Gandra LOW confidence — no UFC analytics; Reese moderate, from his verified fight log), NOT DB-derived percentiles. The near-tie is honest: with Gandra's UFC metrics absent, there is no statistical basis to separate the two technically.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Ryan Gandra Key Advantages
This is the upset path that requires us to invent nothing about Gandra. Reese has been finished twice in his UFC career — both in Round 1, both after being put on his back (slam-to-ground TKO by Cody Brundage; punches-from-guard TKO by Azamat Bekoev). If Gandra is the aggressive finisher his archetype suggests and he lands hard early, or grounds Reese, the most repeatable failure mode in Reese's entire career is right there to be triggered. The opening five minutes are the single highest-leverage window of the fight.
The information gap favors the lesser-known man. Reese's camp has just a single UFC fight of Gandra to study, while Gandra's camp has eight fights of Reese — including a crystal-clear blueprint: get him down, finish from top. The fighter who is harder to prepare for carries a built-in edge, and in this bout that fighter is Gandra. A wildcard with no readable tendencies is, by definition, a tactical problem that no game plan can fully solve.
Reese carries two KO/TKO losses on his ledger — accumulated damage and the psychological residue of being finished are real factors. Gandra, a 9-1 finisher, has not been broken down in front of us. He is also the marginally younger man (31 vs 32). In a fight where roughly half the information is missing, a fresh, unscarred competitor with no visible wear entering on the sport's biggest stage is a genuinely dangerous variable — every small edge counts when the rest is a coin flip.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
With just one UFC fight on record, Gandra is at the earliest stage of his Octagon tenure. Big-stage variance — nerves, an adrenaline dump, or unfamiliarity with the championship-distance UFC pace he has barely tested — is a live risk on a card the size of UFC 329. If it shows up, the more experienced Reese settles in, banks rounds, and either finishes a fading opponent or coasts to a decision: exactly the path Gandra's profile is least equipped to win.
If Gandra cannot get Reese to the mat or hurt him in the opening frame, the fight becomes a measured striking match — and Reese's proven power lands first. His 20-second one-punch KO of Julian Marquez is the Marquez scenario now pointed in Gandra's direction. Failing to capitalize on Round 1 also pushes the bout into the territory where Reese has never been finished: a R2 submission win and proven decision-winning ability once a fight leaves the first frame.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Reese's vulnerability window is the first five minutes. The entire upset hinges on making something happen before Reese settles — pressure, power, and ideally a grounding sequence inside the opening round. Urgency is Gandra's friend: a decision is his worst path (Reese has proven he can win on the cards and Gandra's deep-water UFC capacity is unproven), so this should be a finish attempt, not a points fight.
This is the blueprint Gandra's camp has on tape twice over (Brundage, Bekoev). If Gandra has any grappling pressure in his game, top position against Reese is the highest-percentage finishing scenario in the fight. He must also respect Reese's one-shot counter on entries — closing distance behind feints or level changes rather than walking into the straight that ended Marquez in 20 seconds.
🚀 Zach Reese Key Advantages
Reese owns proven UFC-level finishing power in two phases. The 20-second one-punch KO of Julian Marquez is documented, against an experienced UFC opponent, at distance; the second-round rear-naked choke of Jackson McVey shows he can take a back and finish on the mat. That dual threat forces an opponent to defend both phases, and against a man with barely any Octagon tape for Reese to study, Reese's deep, readable body of work is harder to game-plan around than Gandra's largely unseen UFC tendencies.
Eight UFC fights — including a UFC 311 PPV appearance — mean Reese has acclimated to the lights, the canvas, and the pace, all of which matters on a card the size of UFC 329. Critically, he has never been finished once a fight escapes Round 1: a R2 submission win and a proven ability to win on the cards (Todorovic), with only a razor-thin split decision to Michel Pereira marring his post-Round-1 ledger. If Gandra's cardio or composure wavers in a UFC-pace third round, Reese has the experience to bank rounds and win the cards — a path our model considers far harder for an opponent with a single UFC fight to his name.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Reese's single most-documented way to lose: he gets put on his back in the opening two minutes and the Brundage/Bekoev script repeats — ground strikes, Round 1 stoppage. Both of his career finishes-against share this DNA (slam-to-ground TKO; punches from guard), and against an aggressive finisher it is live from the opening bell. This is the entire architecture of any Gandra upset.
Reese's defensive striking is the soft component of his game. If he over-commits chasing the Marquez-style highlight, he can get countered in a clean exchange against Gandra's unknown power. There is also a discipline note: he already carries a No Contest on his ledger for his own illegal groin kick (Sedriques Dumas), and in a tight fight a foul or point deduction could swing a round he otherwise controls.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Every Reese loss begins with him on his back. The instruction is sprawl-heavy, get-up-immediately, and refuse to give Gandra the one position — top control — where Reese's history says he is finishable. On the feet he should land the hard counter rather than brawl into Gandra's unknown power: pick shots, respect the takedown, and stay off the cage.
Treat Round 1 as the gate. If Reese gets through the opening five minutes without being grounded, history favors him — he has never been finished after Round 1. From there the finish may come (R2 choke vs McVey), but if it does not, Reese can win on the cards as he did against Todorovic. Against an opponent who may fade or struggle with UFC pace, the decision is a fully available Plan B, and he should be willing to take it.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🧠The Known vs The Unknown
This is not the usual "two profiles collide" matchup — it is a structural mismatch of information: a fighter with eight readable UFC fights against one with a single Octagon appearance. That asymmetry cuts both ways. It gives Reese the more reliable floor (we know he can finish, win decisions, and handle the Octagon) and gives Gandra the harder-to-prepare-for ceiling (a 9-1 finisher Reese's corner has almost no tape on). Most of the time the proven commodity is the safer bet, which is why the lean is modestly Reese — but "safer bet" in a fight this data-starved is a low bar, and the upset price reflects genuine live danger.
🎯Reese's Round 1 Threshold
The clearest pattern in the entire dataset is Reese's Round 1 cliff edge. Four of his eight UFC fights ended in Round 1 — and both of his stoppage losses were early ground finishes. But after Round 1 the picture flips: he has never been finished once a fight crosses the five-minute mark — a R2 submission win and decision wins, with only a competitive split-decision loss to Pereira on the other side. The fight has a natural fault line at the end of Round 1: if Gandra is going to win, the data screams he must do it early; if Reese walks back to his corner after Round 1 healthy, every subsequent minute historically belongs to him.
🚪The Grappling Door
Both Reese losses share a DNA: he ends up on his back, and he gets finished there (slam-to-ground TKO vs Brundage; punches-from-guard TKO vs Bekoev). This is the one scenario we can describe with confidence, and it is the entire architecture of any Gandra upset. The problem for the analysis is that we cannot confirm Gandra — a KO/TKO-heavy finisher with almost no UFC tape — is the man to exploit it: his wrestling, top-control grappling, and takedown threat at this level are unproven. The door is unambiguously there; whether Gandra holds the key is unknown. That single uncertainty is the difference between this being a confident Reese pick and a cautious one.
🏁Final Prediction
The single most-likely method is Zach Reese by KO/TKO (24%), leaning on his documented one-shot power, with a decision (20%) and a submission (12%) rounding out his 56%. Gandra's 44% runs almost entirely through Reese's early-finish hole: his 26% KO/TKO is the highest single method category on the board — deliberately so, because it leans on both Reese's own twice-demonstrated Round 1 vulnerability and Gandra's own KO-heavy finishing record (9-1). His submission (10%) captures the top-control finish that twice beat Reese; his decision (8%) is the least plausible route — a fighter with one UFC bout out-pointing a UFC-tested decision-winner over three rounds.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 72% | Break-even: 66.7%
GOOD VALUE
Model: 26% | Implied: 27.8% — most interesting upset prop
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 56% | Implied: 57.4% — the model's straight lean
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Prices Gandra precisely on thin UFC data – With one Octagon fight, his true error bars are far wider.
- • Underweights Reese's early-finish hole – Twice finished in Round 1 from his back (Brundage, Bekoev).
- • Information asymmetry favors the dog – Gandra's camp has 8 fights of Reese tape; Reese's camp has barely one fight of Gandra.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Ryan Gandra
Highest single method — leans on Reese's R1 KO vulnerability
Top-control finish — the scenario that twice beat Reese
Least plausible — out-pointing a UFC-tested decision-winner
💥Outcome Distribution - Zach Reese
Documented one-shot power (Marquez 20-second KO)
Distinctive edge — proven decision-winner (Todorovic)
Verified RNC dimension (McVey, R2)
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - Ryan Gandra
- • First 5 minutes: Highest upset equity — Reese's documented early-finish hole.
- • Grounding sequence: Get Reese down and replay the Brundage/Bekoev finish.
- • Respect the counter: Avoid the straight that ended Marquez in 20 seconds.
🎯Path to Victory - Zach Reese
- • Survive Round 1: never been finished after the opening frame.
- • Defend the takedown: both stoppage losses began on his back.
- • Bank rounds: proven decision-winner — the decision is a live Plan B.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Conviction Level
Deliberately low — one fighter has only a single UFC fight on record and almost no Octagon tape, which forbids a confident pick.
✅Supporting Factors
- • Verified UFC-level finishing in two phases (KO + sub)
- • Never finished after Round 1 (only an R1 vulnerability)
- • 8 UFC fights & big-stage reps vs a UFC sophomore
- • Proven ability to win on the cards (Todorovic)
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Gandra has almost no UFC tape (±15 error bars)
- • Reese's most-documented trait is a vulnerability — twice finished in R1 from his back
- • Thin UFC baseline; information asymmetry favors the dog
🏁Executive Summary
This is a finish-or-be-finished fight that most likely does not see the judges, and its outcome will be written in the first five minutes. In roughly 56 of 100 simulations, Zach Reese either survives a dangerous opening round and then asserts his proven, UFC-tested skill set — closing with his power, his choke, or his ability to win the rounds that reach the cards — or he simply lands the kind of fight-ending shot he already put on Julian Marquez. In the other 44, Ryan Gandra walks through Reese's documented early-finish window: he hurts him on the feet or, more dangerously, puts him on his back and replays the Brundage/Bekoev script that has twice ended Reese's night inside one round. Much else about Gandra at the UFC level — his grappling, his cardio, his composure over three championship-distance rounds — is a question the data cannot yet fully answer, which is why this lean carries a 4/10 conviction rather than a 7.
Prediction: Zach Reese (56%) — most likely by KO/TKO (24%), with a decision (20%) and submission (12%) rounding out his edge; Ryan Gandra's 44% runs almost entirely through Reese's early-finish hole, with his KO/TKO (26%) the single highest method category on the board. A modest, low-confidence lean built on proof rather than statistics — because Gandra's UFC-level game remains, for now, largely unmeasured.