Meng Ding vs José Henrique
Welterweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Song vs. Figueiredo
Saturday, May 30, 2026 • 30 ft cage • Galaxy Arena, Macau
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Meng Ding
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
José Henrique
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Meng Ding
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | Mirali Huseynov | W | TKO — leg kicks + punches (R2, 2:45) |
| Aug 2024 | Rami Hamed | L | Decision — Unanimous (DWCS) (R3, 5:00) |
| Oct 2023 | Kuerbanjiang Tuluosibake | W | TKO (R3, 0:23) |
| Jul 2023 | Qi Wang | W | TKO — body shot (R2, 1:30) |
| Apr 2023 | Kuerbanjiang Tuluosibake | L | Decision — Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - José Henrique
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2024 | Porfirio Alves | W | TKO (R2, 2:30) |
| Jan 2024 | Alexandre Silva | W | Decision — Majority (R3, 5:00) |
| Feb 2023 | Alan Silva | W | TKO — late accumulation (R3, 4:55) |
| Aug 2022 | Yusaku Kinoshita | L | TKO — left hook crisis (R3, 0:43) |
| May 2022 | Pedro Oliveira | W | Decision — Split (R3, 5:00) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (43 vs 34) and Grappling Composite (36 vs 16, QA-adjusted TD-defense priors). Balances striking effectiveness with grappling threat for this matchup.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Meng Ding Key Advantages
Scout-fed efficiency tilts clean minutes toward Ding: 50% accuracy and 48% striking defense vs Henrique's 43% / 39%, with absorption 3.87 vs 5.79 sig strikes per minute. That reception gap is the spine of the handicap — over three rounds it stacks roughly six-plus extra significant strikes against before accounting for shot quality. Henrique's broader DB roll-up echoes the same story (career_damage_ratio ~0.60; 74 dealt / 124 absorbed in computed metrics).
Recent tape validates leg kicks + punches (Huseynov R2 TKO) and a fight-changing body shot lane (Qi Wang). Ding is still stand-first, but he owns the only credible wrestling layer — not a chain wrestler, but timed entries off strikes can steal a round or force hesitation after he wins an exchange. Henrique's official-style slice is 100% standing strike share with zero charted clinch/grappling offense — no statistical Plan B if boxing stalls.
Ding's 35-9 ledger includes explicit decision losses (Hamed UD on DWCS; previous UD to Kuerbanjiang) — he knows the scoreboard exists and can bank safer minutes when ahead. Henrique has never been outpointed at pro level: 100% of losses are KO/TKO and only 25% of wins are decisions — his realistic decision path is thinner if Ding avoids the kill shot.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Henrique is not just taller — he carries a six-inch reach advantage (79″ vs 73″). In a 30-foot cage, long reset lanes reward straight punches and counter windows when footwork stays disciplined. Ding's DWCS setback vs Hamed flags high output without damage as a loseable pattern; if he follows Henrique in straight lines, he feeds the same Kinoshita-style intercept geometry (left-hook crisis after minutes of work).
Ding's 44% of pro losses via submission should not auto-transfer to Henrique ( zero sub wins on paper) — but it still argues for posture discipline on bad doubles and respect in front-head scrambles if he ever shoots exhausted or naked.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Break geometry instead of chasing: calf / inside lows to shorten the 79″, body hooks after jab feints to pull the guard high, and two-to-three punch exits — no extended brawls. The handicap explicitly frames round two as the highest finish-density phase for both — Ding should compound leg/body investment through that window.
Mix timed doubles off the jab when Henrique backs to the fence; ride 30–45 seconds without hunting subs. If ahead late, shift to touch-not-bang — Ding has lived the judges' chess match before and can leverage that psychology in 3×5.
🚀 José Henrique Key Advantages
Henrique stands 6′3″ with a 79″ wingspan vs Ding at 6′2″ / 73″. In the Macau 30-footer, disciplined circling and fence awareness let him touch with jabs and straight rights, exit on angles, and make Ding pay for squared entries. Official-style targeting on file is 84% head / 16% body — a head-hunter profile Ding must fatigue with lower-layer investments.
At 24 with 75% of wins by KO/TKO, Henrique carries genuine finishing equity — recent slate shows R2 TKOs (Alves, Porfirio) plus a gritty R3 accumulation finish vs Alan Silva. Database tags align with ascending confidence (current_streak: 10 wins in computed metrics). His upset lane is counter sequencing early while Ding is still solving range.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Rough strike economy vs Ding: net per minute roughly ≈ −2.34 for Henrique vs ≈ −0.47 for Ding — extended pocket exchanges are mathematically toxic when Ding is landing cleaner and defending better. Henrique's chin_tier: Average with 2 career knockdowns absorbed (computed metrics) refuses "bulletproof" labeling.
Scout sheet shows 0.00 TD15, 0% TD accuracy, 0.0 subs per 15 — if the boxing optics tilt against him, there is no statistical mat escape. Emergency clinch can still happen live, but nothing in the ledger suggests he steals rounds with top time.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Default gameplan: jab toward the chest,cross on exits, circle toward the open side of the 30-footer, punish squared entries with intercepts. He cannot win a pure volume war on these numbers — prioritize clean power counters over spam.
Kinoshita loss proves damage can arrive late (0:43 R3); Alan Silva bout shows he can accumulate into R3. If hurt, smother in the clinch even though historical offensive clinch share on file is 0% — survival first, then hail-Mary power.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics
The 30-foot Galaxy Arena cage frames a geometry war: Henrique's 79″ reach and 6′3″ frame buy reset lanes and counter optics when he circles with discipline. Ding's assignment is to narrow the cage — cut corners, layer calf/body work from the breakdown tape (Huseynov, Qi Wang), and refuse linear chases that fund straight intercepts. Neither man has official UFC ledger defense samples yet; listed 0% TD defense placeholders are treated as missing data, not literal zeros — the model uses neutral priors until fight-night feeds populate.
🎯Technical Breakdown
The handicap hinges on strike economy, not a wrestling monopoly: outputs are essentially a push (3.40 vs 3.45 SLpM), but Henrique bleeds 5.79 SApM against vs Ding's 3.87 while trailing in accuracy/defense (43–44% / 38–39% vs 50% / 48%). Ding adds the only credible TD15 layer (1.00 @ 50%) against 0.00 TD15 — enough to steal optics or force doubt after winning stand-up sequences. Henrique's DB row remains thin official-sample shaped; spatial fields are largely null with data_quality_score 0.40, so we lean on scout exports plus tape narratives from the Macau cluster doc.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Five deciding layers from the breakdown: cage-cutting vs circling (who owns center and fence in the 30-footer); leg investment (Ding's documented calf pathways vs Henrique's 84% head-heavy ledger slice); defensive discipline in pocket trades (5.79 SApM makes phone-booth math toxic for Henrique); DWCS scar tissue divergence — Ding respects cards after Hamed, Henrique historically needs hurt sequences to bank cleaner wins; timed wrestling as Ding's volatility knob versus Henrique's zero-charted offensive grappling.
🏁Final Prediction
Across 100 mental simulations, the modal story is Ding by KO/TKO (~38% absolute) or decision (~18%), stacking to 61% inclusive of a thin ~5% submission tail. Henrique's winning portrait is ~28% KO/TKO counter spike plus ~10% decision (39% total with a ~1% sub novelty). Fair-ish western lines from the write-up: Ding −156 / Henrique +156; combined decision frequency ~28% supports long prices on the judge's outcome relative to finish markets (welterweight variance — conviction capped at 6 / 10 until Ding is ingested into Supabase).
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model absolute KO path ~38% vs fair ~+161 from Macau sim cluster.
GOOD VALUE
Combined finish-heavy paths dominate (~72% vs ~28% decision envelope per breakdown props).
SLIGHT VALUE
Live dog spike lane (~28% absolute) if counters land before attrition compounds.
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Reach markup – Markets can overweight the 79″ weapon without baking in 5.79 SApM reception stress across nine minutes.
- • TD defense placeholders – Listed 0% defensive samples are noise until UFC feeds land; models using literal zeros misprice Ding's timed wrestling threat.
- • Big-cage optics – Early rounds reward disciplined circling; mid-fight leg/body tax flips geometry if Ding cuts space responsibly.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Meng Ding
Safe-minute banking after hurting Henrique — knows cards exist
Leg/body attrition + chin probe vs absorption-heavy opponent
Thin offensive history — tail only if scramble chaos opens neck/crank lanes
💥Outcome Distribution - José Henrique
Counter lanes while Ding computes length — Kinoshita ghost still relevant
Thin historically — needs optics without finishing Ding
No pro submission wins on file — novelty upside only
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - José Henrique
- • Rounds 1–6 minutes: Best straight-shot counter equity before Ding's tax compounds.
- • Circling discipline: Open-side resets in the large cage — punish squared entries only.
- • Pick power: Avoid pocket trades; leverage reach with intercept sequencing.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Meng Ding
- • Cage geometry: Cut lanes — calf/body series drains the long guard (84/16 head bias on Henrique's ledger slice).
- • Strike economics: Force Henrique into minus exchanges — data says he eats nearly two extra sig strikes per minute.
- • Insurance TDs: Double off the jab near fence for short rides without sub hunting.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
Reach + youth KO volatility vs half the pairing still off Supabase — tails stay fat
✅Supporting Factors
- • Cleaner striking triangle (50/48 vs 43–44 / 38–39) plus 3.87 vs 5.79 SApM edge
- • Only credible TD15 insurance in the matchup
- • Documented leg/body finish lanes on recent tape (Huseynov, Qi Wang)
- • Card-aware psychology after DWCS UD lesson
⚠️Risk Factors
- • 79″ reach counters if Ding chases linearly
- • Youthful KO bursts (recent R2 TKOs + Kinoshita ghost R3)
- • Thin DB samples — official rows may understate chaos variance
🏁Executive Summary
Expect Ding to compress geometry, bank safer strike minutes, and layer calf/body investments so Henrique's 84% head-heavy reads become predictable exhaustion. Henrique's realistic upset lane remains early counter sequencing while Ding maps range — reach buys windows, but discipline and reception economics buy scorecards. Across repeated simulations, efficiency plus low-volume wrestling insurance edges reach alone more often than not — still welterweight debut variance, not algebra homework (conviction 6 / 10). Poster thesis from the cluster doc: "Reach buys windows — discipline and defense buy decisions."
Prediction: Meng Ding ~61% aggregate vs José Henrique ~39%; headline methods Ding KO 38% / Dec 18% / Sub 5% vs Henrique KO 28% / Dec 10% / Sub 1%. Fair-style western lines from the write-up: Ding −156, Henrique +156. Revisit once Ding is ingested into Supabase and UFC fight-night feeds replace TD-defense placeholders.