Alex Perez vs Sumudaerji
Men's Flyweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Song vs. Figueiredo
Saturday, May 30, 2026 • Galaxy Arena, Macau — large 30 ft cage
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Alex Perez
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Sumudaerji
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Alex Perez
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-18 | Charles Johnson | W | KO/TKO - Punches (R2, 4:18) |
| 2025-11-15 | Asu Almabayev | L | Submission - Guillotine Choke (R3, 0:22) |
| 2024-06-15 | Tatsuro Taira | L | KO/TKO (R2, 2:59) |
| 2024-04-27 | Matheus Nicolau | W | KO/TKO - Right Hook (R2, 2:16) |
| 2024-03-02 | Muhammad Mokaev | L | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Sumudaerji
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Jesus Aguilar | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-08-23 | Kevin Borjas | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-04-12 | Mitch Raposo | W | Decision - Split (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-10-19 | Charles Johnson | L | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-12-09 | Tim Elliott | L | Submission - Arm-Triangle Choke (R1, 3:00) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (48 vs 52) and Grappling Composite (51 vs 41). Balances striking effectiveness with grappling threat; Sumudaerji wins the kickboxing row, Perez the grappling row on this sheet.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Alex Perez Key Advantages
Official UFC-stats takedown volume heavily favors Perez: 2.21 TD/15 vs Sumudaerji's 0.67, with 48% accuracy and 75% TD defense on the wrestle-box side. The database control snapshot (~67 sec vs ~21 sec control per round) points the same direction—when Perez commits to layered entries, clinch rides, and mat returns, he can bank the minutes that offset losing the open-mat kickboxing. This is not lay-and-pray; it is interrupting a tall southpaw's outside geometry with calf-driven entries and tie-up offense.
Perez carries real knockdown equity in the model layer and proven receipts vs credible flyweights (recent Charles Johnson and Matheus Nicolau KOs). His 0.7 submissions/15 and early-window submission timing tag match the eye test: tie-ups → top rides → squeezes (guillotine lanes show up repeatedly in his UFC reel). That makes him dangerous even when he is losing the jab chess match—he does not need to out-volume Sumudaerji to keep the fight live; he needs one clean corridor or one compromised neck.
Career strike-origin data shows Perez lives meaningfully more in clinch + ground combined than Sumudaerji—this is the handicap thesis in one sentence: shrink the southpaw corridor, force chest-to-chest, then layer knees and entries. His 81% ground striking accuracy in the deeper database roll-up mirrors violent short bursts on the mat rather than safe pitter-patter. If Perez can turn an early boxing loss into a leg-kick + level-change game before Sumudaerji settles on outside straight lines, the reach gap becomes less decisive.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Sumudaerji is the taller, longer southpaw in a 30 ft cage with roughly ~80% distance striking life on paper. If Perez follows in straight lines without cutting the cage or forcing tie-ups, he becomes counter fodder for straight lines and intercepting kicks—the same geometry stress that produces wide decision optics vs disciplined rangefinders.
Computed round curves tag Perez as a "Fades Late" profile with Round 3 output roughly 41% of Round 1; leg target share rises while head share falls as minutes stack—a pattern that can read as losing the boxing race and "kicking safe" in swing rounds. Sumudaerji's Strong Finisher tag (R3 output ~141% of R1) is built for exactly those minutes in a three-rounder.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Perez should open with disciplined rear-leg/low-line feints and hard outside low kicks to steal the southpaw's base—not naked long blitzes into a 72" reach. The goal is to force Sumudaerji to shell and reset, then crash into a body lock or fence wrestle where 2.21 TD/15 becomes a real weapon. In the database's submission timing split, many attempts cluster early—if a scramble opens in Round 1, Perez has historically been willing to jump on the neck fast.
The breakdown sketch treats Round 2 as Perez's highest TD-volume phase: committed doubles, body locks, and mat returns to stack control before optics slide late. On top, prioritize heavy shoulders, short GNP, and safe rides rather than reckless sub bailouts that historically invite guillotine / front-head trouble vs elite chain grapplers. If Perez can push cumulative control near the swing thresholds discussed (~90+ seconds in multiple rounds), several close scorecards flip.
🚀 Sumudaerji Key Advantages
A seven-inch reach edge at flyweight is fight-shaping: Sumudaerji can keep Perez at the end of his straight lines, use lateral exits in the large cage, and bank low-risk minutes without engaging chest-to-chest. His recent ledger—three straight fifteen-minute decision wins—shows he can execute the volume-and-space plan against credible opponents when he avoids prolonged wrestling sequences.
UFC-stats rows peg Sumudaerji as the safer minute-winner—50% accuracy, 62% defense, and noticeably lower absorption (2.35 SApM vs Perez 3.20). That pairs with elite-tier damage economy in the flyweight pool: he trades efficiently and closes rounds with a head-hunt drift while Perez's targeting migrates toward legs late. If the fight stays at range, scorecards tend to glide toward the Tibetan Eagle.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Perez is not a one-note wrestler—he invests in clinch strikes and has a credible top game relative to Sumudaerji's sparse offensive wrestling. Historical submission losses (Elliott arm triangle, etc.) prove the Tibetan Eagle is not submission-proof when chain wrestlers lock in transitions, even if finishes are not his primary loss mode week-to-week.
Styles make fights, but the Johnson split is a high-signal ceiling check: Sumudaerji dropped a wide decision to the same opponent Perez recently stopped—proof Perez's burst ceiling vs long, busy boxers can exceed Sumudaerji's when reads and timing align, even while Sumudaerji owns a cleaner three-fight decision floor.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Sumudaerji should spend most of his early currency on feints, rear straight reads, and exits — not wrestling. Let Perez pay with entries, then punish with straight shots as leg-kick volume climbs and posture rises. The database's late head-share climb pairs with a rising output curve—Round 3 is the window to press if the scorecards are contested.
When Perez commits, threaten uppercuts and short hooks on the fence exit, then recycle to space.72% takedown defense is solid but not a fortress—discipline matters more than one-off defense percentages. The clearest upset catalysts for Perez are reactive, desperate shots after losing minutes; Sumudaerji benefits when those entries get sloppy or chin-high.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics
Galaxy Arena's 30-foot cage initially rewards the man who does not chase squared-up: Sumudaerji gains reset space and rear-leg chamber room behind a 72" reach, while Perez must cut the cage and manufacture fence sequences. Over three rounds, the geometry battle is straightforward—if Sumudaerji maintains 85%+ distance share, decision equity balloons; if Perez forces repeated clinch and ride phases, the optics compress toward his world.
🎯Technical Breakdown
Two statistical portraits collide: Sumudaerji's 50% accuracy and 2.35 SApM describe a risk-averse rangefinder, while Perez's 2.21 TD15 and higher clinch+ground strike share describe interruption-based offense. Striking volume is nearly tied on the UFC-stats row (4.41 vs 4.43 SLpM), so the bout is usually decided by where those strikes occur—open mat vs tie-up—and by whether Perez's 0.7 Sub/15 threat materializes off scrambles.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Three levers swing probability: first-layer shots vs chain re-attacks, Perez leg-kick migration vs Sumudaerji head-hunt drift, and R3 output curves. Sumudaerji's Strong Finisher tag aligns with cleaner straight shots as minutes accrue; Perez's Fades Late tag raises judge risk unless he already banked damage or top time. The shared Charles Johnson fork does not decide the matchup by transitive logic, but it sketches ceiling/floor: Perez can spike violently, Sumudaerji can still out-stabilize many kickboxing tracks.
🏁Final Prediction
The sim bucket leans Sumudaerji: roughly 32/100 decision and 24/100 KO/TKO paths against Perez 14/100 decision, 16/100 KO/TKO, and 12/100 submission outcomes. Fair-ish Western lines from the write-up land near Sumudaerji −165 / Perez +140on a mild favorite structure. Conviction is solid-but-not-max: Perez's power and wrestling honesty keep live variance elevated compared with a pure attritional kickboxing race.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: ~32% win via decision • Illustrative fair holding ~+200 region before vig
GOOD VALUE
Distribution tilts distance + accumulation; still respects Perez R1–R2 kill windows
SLIGHT VALUE
Model clusters ~26/100 early finishes for Perez + ~26/100 inside-distance Sumudaerji (still leaves distance alive)
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Perez live finishing skew – Market can underweight dual-threat stoppage paths off scrambles.
- • Reach governor narrative – Big-cage geometry plus three straight Sumudaerji decisions anchor the favorite price.
- • Late-round thermals – Opposite R3 curves swing tight cards if R1–R2 are even.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Alex Perez
Needs top time + damage to offset range minutes
Johnson / Nicolau template — explosive R2 corridors
Early-hunter squeezes if scrambles open
💥Outcome Distribution - Sumudaerji
Late accumulation vs fading entries
Primary volume bank in open space
Rare — greedy Perez shot into turnover
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - Sumudaerji
- • Early corridor: Bank safe optics before Perez forces clinch layers.
- • Leg chamber: Use 30 ft resets to keep him at the end of straight shots.
- • Deny rides: If taken down, prioritize standing — avoid extended top cycles.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Alex Perez
- • Fence cutting: Shrink the southpaw bubble before R3 thermals bite.
- • Control ceilings: 90+ sec across two rounds flips tight cards in-model.
- • Live subs early: Jump scrambled necks before footing gets sloppy.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
Lean Sumudaerji, but Perez KO/wrestling honest volatility caps ceiling
✅Supporting Factors
- • Seven-inch reach edge + southpaw outside lanes in 30 ft cage
- • Three straight clean decision executions (Aguilar/Borjas/Raposo)
- • Better damage economy & late-round output curve
- • Flyweight striking accuracy/defense advantage on the sheet
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Perez 2.21 TD15 & clinch-heavy offense
- • Johnson KO fork — ceiling spikes vs rangefinders
- • 0.7 Sub/15 & scramble neck threat
🏁Executive Summary
Sumudaerji enters as the cleaner range governor in a Macau 30 ft cage — 72" reach, 50% accuracy, 62% defense, and a trio of recent 15-minute decision banks show he can execute without relying on a highlight-reel blitz. Perez remains the more volatile dual threat: 2.21 TD/15, historically violent clinch/mat bursts, and fresh proof he can still KO long, busy flyweights (Johnson, Nicolau). The handicap tension is timeline + space: Sumudaerji's Strong Finisher curve in Round 3 collides with Perez's documented Fades Late output drop — unless Perez builds damage or control early.
Prediction: Model leans Sumudaerji ~58% (fair vicinity −165) against Perez ~42% (+140) with the most mass on Sumudaerji decision (~32%) and Perez inside-distance mixes (~28% combined KO+SUB). Live card: whoever turns Round 3 into either a straight-shooting sprint (favors Sumudaerji) or a grappling-tilted scrap (favors Perez) likely decides the night.