Shauna Bannon vs Nicolle Caliari
Women's Strawweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Costa
Saturday, May 16, 2026 • 25 ft octagon (UFC Apex-style small cage) — less space to circle
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Shauna Bannon
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Nicolle Caliari
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Shauna Bannon
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-04 | Sam Hughes | L | Submission - RNC (R2, 1:58) |
| 2025-03-22 | Puja Tomar | W | Submission - Armbar (R2, 3:22) |
| 2024-07-27 | Alice Ardelean | W | Decision - Split (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-07-22 | Bruna Brasil | L | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-03-15 | Minna Grusander | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Nicolle Caliari
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-10 | Carli Judice | L | TKO - Body Knee & Ground Strikes (R3, 1:30) |
| 2025-01-11 | Ernesta Kareckaite | L | Decision - Split (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-09-10 | Corinne Laframboise | W | Submission - Armbar (R1, 4:45) |
| 2024-05-18 | Daniela Antonelli | W | Submission - RNC (R2, 3:34) |
| 2024-02-24 | Carolina Jiménez | W | Submission - Armbar (R2, 4:51) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (64 vs 48) and Grappling Composite (42 vs 55). Bannon's cleaner striking and defense pull the score up; Caliari's wrestling and submission threat pull it back toward a narrow overall gap.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Shauna Bannon Key Advantages
Bannon lands at a higher rate with better accuracy (43% vs 38%) while absorbing far less (3.75 vs 7.01 significant strikes per minute). That damage profile is the clearest round-winning signal if she keeps enough distance — Caliari can post a decent defense percentage and still take visible contact because opponents find her in extended chaos phases.
Height and reach matter because Caliari must cross space to wrestle; every failed entry paid in long straight shots, teeps, and counters feeds Bannon's optics. Switching compounds timing reads on entries — Caliari already absorbs heavy volume, and longer weapons punish naked rushes even in a small cage.
Bannon has already banked multiple UFC decisions and shown she can win layered fights. Caliari has never won by decision — if the fight becomes a minutes battle after the early storm, Bannon's scoring architecture is more bankable. Longer recent fight lengths (~12.1 vs ~9.9 minutes in our sample) support a 15-minute pacing edge.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Bannon is in trouble if Caliari closes distance without paying a striking tax — fence clinch, repeated mat returns, or scramble-to-back sequences erase reach. The nightmare chain is pressure → clinch → takedown attempt → scramble → back exposure → submission threat, mirroring the volatility in her Hughes loss (even if Caliari is a different type of grappler: more chaos than suffocating control).
At ~40% takedown defense, Bannon cannot assume stuffs — the small cage helps Caliari force contact faster. If Bannon gets stuck defending ride positions or extended scrambles, her striking volume collapses and judges see Caliari's minute-stealing swings.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Open with jabs, teeps, long straights, and low kicks; lateral exits after clusters. Make Caliari shoot from suboptimal range, frame immediately in clinches, and avoid lazy kicks that can be caught. Body work matters — Caliari was recently stopped via knee-to-body and follow-up ground strikes; teeps, straight shots downstairs, and knees on breaks compound that history without requiring one-shot head power.
She does not need to dominate wrestling — prioritize underhooks, quick resets, and punishing failed entries. Opportunistic subs (see the Tomar armbar) can lurk if Caliari overcommits; the macro goal is bankable stand-up minutes and visible volume for the judges.
🚀 Nicolle Caliari Key Advantages
Caliari is the fighter more likely to force wrestling exchanges — 2.88 takedowns per 15 minutes with 1.0 submission attempts per 15. In a 25 ft cage she can crash distance quickly and chain attempts even when accuracy sits at only ~24% (failed shots still tax posture and stance).
Every career win is a finish — she is built to create chaos and hunt the neck, arm, or back in scrambles. That matters against an opponent recently submitted by RNC: one dominant grappling stretch can flip optics even if she is losing striking minutes.
Less lateral space helps the pressurer: Caliari can cut off resets, force early clinches, and turn scrambles into submission entries. Round 1 is disproportionately important — if she establishes grappling danger early, Bannon may fight more conservatively and blunt her own rhythm.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Caliari absorbs 7.01 significant strikes per minute — an extreme number against a 65"-reach striker who lands steadily. If early takedowns fail, she spends energy chasing a longer fighter who can touch her on every reset; that macro pattern favors decision losses or late defensive breakdowns.
0-2 in the UFC with zero career decision wins signals a finishes-or-bust portfolio. If Bannon survives the first grappling storms and keeps the fight methodological, Caliari lacks a proven Plan B on the scorecards versus a longer, cleaner volume striker.
📋 Likely Gameplan
She cannot sit at range — feint to hide entries, use the small cage to cut off circles, and chain clinch → takedown sequences instead of spamming naked singles. Attacking subs off scrambles (armbars, RNC windows) keeps Bannon honest after failed shots.
Win condition is ugly work early: make Bannon carry weight, threaten subs before reads solidify, and avoid prolonged kickboxing phases where the damage column tilts. If minute ten hits without a dominant grappling sequence, the model swings sharply toward Bannon's pacing.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics
The 25 ft Apex cage cuts down lateral space — it helps Caliari crash distance and force clinches early (especially against ~40% takedown defense), but it is not a pure underdog upgrade: if she pressures without completing ties, the same small geometry can accelerate fatigue from repeated failed entries. Bannon still owns the cleaner open-space striking picture when she resets; the cage mostly tightens early variance rather than reversing the macro strike-totals expectation across three rounds.
🎯Technical Breakdown
The central tension is repeatable volume vs volatile finishing: Bannon's 4.32 SLpM, 43% accuracy, and 3.75 SApM contrast with Caliari absorbing 7.01 SApM while hunting 2.88 TD15 and 1.0 submission attempts per 15. Caliari's 24% takedown accuracy means she may burn attempts to land one — every stall resets Bannon's length. Striking defense percentages (45% vs 53%) undersell the story: the damage-absorbed column says Caliari is hittable in practice against a switch-stance fighter who can vary lead-side looks on her entries.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Watch the first two clinch/takedown sequences — if Bannon frames, punishes entries, and exits, the fight trends decisively toward her volume. If Caliari completes an early tie and threatens the back or neck, the bout compresses toward her best-case scenario. Psychologically, Caliari is 0-2 in the UFC with every pro win by finish; urgency can sharpen her pressure or force reckless shots that feed Bannon's counters. Bannon's own armbar win proves she is not a grappling zero — reckless transitions carry counter-sub risk for Caliari, too.
🔭Deeper Handicapping Angles
- UFC adaptation gap: Bannon has already moved through early-octagon adjustments; Caliari's regional finishing rate is real but less predictive than her 0-2 UFC sample vs better durability.
- Hughes loss context: That submission flags defensive grappling holes, but Hughes is a long-tenured pressure grappler — Caliari's best work is scramble-sudden, not always the same control lane.
- Round-1 leverage: Caliari's equity is front-loaded; if Bannon wins R1 on defense + optics, Caliari may escalate desperation entries.
- Narrative: Repeatability (clean minutes) vs volatility (one grappling storm). Bannon can take a competitive 29-28; Caliari often needs a moment, not a margin.
🏁Final Prediction
We lean clearly toward Shauna Bannon by decision (~35% of her 64% umbrella) as the cleanest macro path: range management, higher landing volume, better damage absorption, and proven UFC scorecards. Live KO/TKO equity exists for Bannon because of Caliari's strike absorption. Caliari's most likely lane inside her 36% is submission (~17%), aligning with Bannon's recent RNC loss and TD defense — with KO chaos and a thin decision tail. Fair moneyline math centers near -178 / +178 (64/36).
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 35% of all outcomes (~55% of her wins) • Primary round-banking path
GOOD VALUE
Model: 17% of all outcomes (~47% of her wins) • Aligns with scramble danger + Bannon RNC loss
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 58% inside distance • Caliari all-finishes profile + Bannon sub vulnerability
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Finisher narrative may overshoot sub price — Bannon's minutes profile is still the modal outcome.
- • Small-cage discount — Market can overweight early clinch danger vs Bannon's SLpM / SApM separation.
- • TD accuracy flag — 24% completion keeps Caliari's grappling edge narrower than raw TD15 implies.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Shauna Bannon
Modal path — bank minutes at range on volume & accuracy
Attrition vs high SApM; cumulative damage & body lanes
Opportunistic if Caliari overcommits (Tomar armbar template)
💥Outcome Distribution - Nicolle Caliari
Best lane: scrambles, RNC/armbar chains vs suspect TD D
Early chaos shots; strikes off clinch breaks
No pro decision wins — thinnest conditional in the matrix
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity — Nicolle Caliari
- • First ~7 minutes: Crash distance before Bannon's reads sharpen.
- • Chain wrestling: Layer shots off the fence; avoid naked long entries.
- • Submission bursts: Capitalize on any turtle or back exposure early.
🎯Probabilistic control — Shauna Bannon
- • Punish entries: Straight shots and body kicks when Caliari squares.
- • Reset discipline: Frame, exit, force reshoots until accuracy degrades.
- • Late-round bank: Volume optics improve if clinch storm does not stick.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
Solid edge on strike volume, accuracy & damage absorbed; capped by real grappling volatility
✅Supporting Factors
- • 4.32 vs 3.46 SLpM + much lower SApM (3.75 vs 7.01)
- • +3" reach & switch looks punish naked entries
- • Decision equity & 2-2 UFC sample vs 0-2 Caliari
- • Cardio / duration signals favor 15-minute pacing
⚠️Risk Factors
- • ~40% takedown defense vs active TD shooter
- • Recent RNC loss keeps back / neck sequences live
- • 25 ft cage tightens Caliari's early contact windows
🏁Executive Summary
This projects as Bannon's cleaner striking path versus Caliari's narrower — but violent — grappling spikes. The flagship number is Caliari's 7.01 significant strikes absorbed per minute against a rangy 4.32 SLpM striker; that usually produces visible strike totals for Bannon if distance resets exist. Caliari survives statistically via initiative: 2.88 TD15 and submission hunting compress the fight when entries land, but 24% TD accuracy and an 0-2 UFC ledger cap how often we should expect dominant control. The 25 ft cage raises early variance without fully neutralizing reach.
Prediction: Shauna Bannon by decision — secondary live lanes: Bannon late TKO on accumulation, Caliari sub upset if she secures prolonged grappling turns early.