Jake Matthews vs Tahir Abdullayev: analysis & prediction

PRELIMS · WELTERWEIGHT · 3 ROUNDSUFC Fight Night: Procházka vs. Stirling
Jake Matthews — Welterweight fighter

Jake Matthews

“The Celtic Kid”
23W8L
Defense-First Positional Grappler
VS
Tahir Abdullayev — Welterweight fighter

Tahir Abdullayev

“Tank”
20W3L
Pressure Grappler, Heavy Hands

Two takedowns is the line: Tahir needs them, and Matthews has never beaten a man who landed them.

WelterweightABHA Arena, Doha, QatarNovember 21, 2026Standard 30ft Octagon

Fight overview

The fight in 30 seconds

Matthews wants a range fight: counter the pawing entries with the straight right and make Tahir shoot from open space into a black belt's front headlock. Tahir has to wrestle early and from the clinch, because Matthews has never beaten an opponent who landed two takedowns on him. Waiting for the third round, as Tahir did in his UFC debut, would leave him behind on the cards.

Paths that change the fight

  • Jake MatthewsWin the first ten minutes at range the way Nascimento did, and turn every Tahir shot into a front-headlock or back-take chance. He loses this fight mainly if he gives up two takedowns and carries the bottom position — he is 0-3 when that happens.
  • Tahir AbdullayevLand two takedowns and hold him there. Matthews has never beaten an opponent who landed two, and he is 2-5 when an opponent banks 2:30 of control. Shoot early and from the clinch, not from open space into the front headlock.
What limits this estimate · Analyst conviction: 3/10
  • Matthews is 0-3 when opponents land two or more takedowns and 2-5 when they bank 2:30+ of control; Tahir banked 3:12 in one round at Baku.
  • A heavy top game: 19 of 26 ground strikes in Round 3 at Baku and seven career submissions, four in the same choke family that has beaten Matthews four times.

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Jake Matthews

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
62%
Fair odds
-163
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
1.61

Tahir Abdullayev

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
38%
Fair odds
+163
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
2.63
Price freshness & calculation notes

Quotes older than 48 hours are marked outdated. EV at an old or undated price is a historical calculation, not a current opportunity. Date-only snapshots have no verified capture time.

Sources and data limitations

The September 29 card announcement named Akbar Abdullaev as Matthews' opponent in error; the booked opponent is Tahir Abdullayev. Career records, UFC bout logs and rate lines through September 2026; composite scores, the simulation, probabilities and fair prices are MMA Analytics model outputs.

Model methodology
01

The Frame

What this fight is really about — and the measurements that shape it

The Analyst's Take

Jake Matthews comes off one of the most complete performances of his career, and his record has a dependable shape: he beats the fringe and newcomers and loses to genuine risers. Tahir Abdullayev has one UFC fight, a come-from-behind stoppage he built on late wrestling after being out-struck early. The question is which side of that ledger he belongs on: perfect on the regional scene, he has mostly come up short whenever the level rose. The swing is the late fight, where Tahir turned his debut around and where Matthews' last defeat came after he had banked the early rounds.

Jake Matthews
Attribute
Tahir Abdullayev
32
Age
3 years younger29
5'11"+3"
Height
5'8"
73"
Reach
73"
43"
Leg Reach
—
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
XLR8 Training Centre, Epping, Victoria (head coach: his father)
Team
Team Alpha Male, with Urijah Faber as his coach; has also trained at Phuket Top Team
Jun 28, 2014 (age 19)
Octagon Debut
Jun 27, 2026
24 (16-8)275:41 of UFC cage time vs 14:28
Octagon Bouts
1 (1-0)
Unranked
Division Rank
Unranked
175 (May 30, 2026)
Days Since Last Fight
147 (Jun 27, 2026)
BJJ black belt under Carlos 'Português' Vieira; 9 career submissions, 6 in the UFC
Grappling Pedigree
No documented belt or single base; 7 career submissions, 4 of them chokes
Defense-first counter-boxer with a front-headlock and back-take game
Fighting Style
Pressure grappler who paws behind the lead hand and finishes from top

Matthews has the frame, Tahir has the density, and the reach is dead even. Matthews has a three-inch height edge (5'11" against 5'8") with identical 73" reaches. The more useful description is qualitative. One preview of the Baku debut called Tahir 'brawny, powerfully built' and noted that he 'both needs to get into close quarters as a short [fighter], and wants to.' That is the shape of this fight: Tahir has to close distance to do anything, and closing distance is where Matthews' two best weapons live, a counter straight right (by his own account his favourite strike) and a front headlock. Matthews has fought at 170 since November 2017 and has gone 12-5 there; Tahir won and lost the UAE Warriors welterweight belt, so this is not a weight-class question. Neither man is on short notice: the bout was announced 53 days out.

Venue Factor
ABHA Arena is an arena show, so the fight is in the full-size Octagon rather than the Meta APEX's small cage. Space matters for both men. Almost all of Matthews' UFC takedown attempts are clinch-derived, so he wants the fence. Tahir's Baku tape shows the other side: for two rounds he could not cut off a lateral mover ('Abdullayev moved forward slowly but struggled to cut off Nascimento,' Cageside Press), and his first round produced 5 landed strikes from 20 thrown. Matthews is not a stick-and-move fighter and does not need to be; a bigger cage gives him room to jab, counter and wait for the level change.
02

The Fighters

Careers, chins, schedules — and the form they bring into the cage

Jake Matthews lands a punch on André Fialho at UFC 275 in Singapore, June 2022

Jake Matthews

Pro Record
23-8-0
UFC Record
16-8 across 24 bouts since June 2014 (12-5 at welterweight, 4-3 at lightweight)
Streak
W1 (Harris) after the Magny loss; 4-1 in his last five
Finish Rate
61% (14 of 23 wins) — 5 KO/TKO, 9 submissions; UFC-only 50% (8 of 16)
Avg Fight Time
11:29
Chin · Good — stopped by strikes once in 31 fights (Kevin Lee's ground strikes, 2016); 4 UFC knockdowns absorbed, all in two fights, none since December 2022SOS · Mid-divisionPositional Grappler / Counter-Boxer

Matthews debuted in the UFC at 19, went 4-3 at lightweight, moved to welterweight in November 2017 and has gone 12-5 there. The record has a hard ceiling and a solid floor. Every time he was matched with a future contender or an unbeaten riser (Vick, Brady, Morales, Kevin Lee) he lost; against everyone else he has been extremely reliable, and against fringe or debuting UFC opponents he is 9-1 at almost twenty significant strikes a fight better than the man across from him. The trend lines since 2024 are about how he grapples, not how much. His striking output is stable (3.54 landed a minute over his last five fights against 3.36 for his career), and he has absorbed no knockdowns in the seven fights since Semelsberger dropped him three times in December 2022. But his takedown offence has collapsed, from 1.46 per 15 minutes in bouts 4–24 to 0.51, one takedown in his last three fights, while his control has risen to half of all fight time in those three. His grappling now starts from the other man's shot. Harris showed the upside of that (0 for 3 on takedowns, 9:30 of control conceded). Magny showed the downside: he dominated two rounds, was hurt by a right hand in the third, conceded two more takedowns and tapped to a D'Arce.

Tahir Abdullayev finishes Jefferson Nascimento with ground-and-pound in Baku, June 2026 (broadcast still)

Tahir Abdullayev

Pro Record
20-3-0
UFC Record
1-0 — one bout, June 2026
Streak
Five straight wins (Kosinov, Rakhmatov, Shadmanov, Dadras, Nascimento)
Finish Rate
90% (18 of 20 wins) — 11 KO/TKO, 7 submissions
Avg Fight Time
14:28 (one UFC bout)
Chin · Never stopped by strikes in 23 pro fights; 0 knockdowns absorbed in 14:28 of UFC timeSOS · RegionalPressure Grappler

Tahir turned pro in April 2015 at 18 and won his first seven fights before Roman Bogatov, who reached the UFC two years later, submitted him with an arm-triangle in 2018. He rebuilt to 13-1 and lost a vacant UAE Warriors title fight to Josh Togo in 2022 on the cards (49-46, 49-46, 48-47) as a −425 to −549 closing favourite. He won the belt in May 2024 as a +500 underdog, stopping Shakhban Alkhasov on what he says was seven days' notice, then lost it five months later to the then 9-0 grappler Khotam Boynazarov over five rounds. In 2025 he won four regional fights in nineteen weeks, all inside two rounds and three of them by choke, against thin opposition: one opponent was on a five-fight losing streak and the next was 1-1. The UFC signed him off that run. At home in Baku he won a fight he was losing, and the split in his record is the story: perfect against the regional scene, 2-3 whenever the step up came.

Jake Matthews
0 dealt · 0 absorbed
Knockdown Exchange
Knockdowns dealt vs absorbed.
Tahir Abdullayev
0 dealt · 0 absorbed

Jake Matthewssignature weapons

Rear-Naked ChokeFive in the UFC — Rocha (R2 1:52), Case (R3 4:45), Anzai (R1 2:44), Flowers (R2 2:37), Njokuani (R1 1:09, July 2025) — plus Jumeau and Purdon regionally
×7
TriangleDashon Johnson by triangle choke at 3:16 of R3 in his UFC debut (2014); Callan Potter by triangle armbar regionally (2013)
×2
Counter Right / PunchesUFC finishes: Andre Fialho, KO at 2:24 of R2 (2022, Performance of the Night), and Akbarh Arreola by doctor stoppage after R2 (2015). Last knockdown scored: Harris, early R3, May 2026
×2

Tahir Abdullayevsignature weapons

Punches / Ground-and-PoundNine of his eleven KO/TKO wins, including the UAE Warriors title win over Alkhasov (R2 4:35) and the UFC finish of Nascimento (hammerfists, R3 4:28)
×9
GuillotineLyapunov (R3 3:00) and Siavash Dadras (R2 4:40, GFC 33, October 2025)
×2
Arm-in Chokes (shoulder / north-south)Shadmanov by shoulder choke — an arm-triangle 'from the wrong side' — at R1 3:23, and Rakhmatov by north-south choke at R1 4:12, both in 2025
×2
ArmbarAkylbekov (R2 2:05) and Aliyev (R2 3:57), both regional
×2

Jake Matthews

W
Carlston Harris
Decision — Unanimous (30-25, 30-27, 30-27)

Opponent context: veteran

R3 (5:00)
UFC Fight Night: Song vs. Figueiredo — May 30, 2026
L
Neil Magny
Submission — D'Arce choke

Opponent context: veteran

R3 (3:08)
UFC Fight Night: Ulberg vs. Reyes — Sep 27, 2025
W
Chidi Njokuani
Submission — Rear-naked choke

Opponent context: veteran

R1 (1:09)
UFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Teixeira — Jul 12, 2025
W
Francisco Prado
Decision — Unanimous

Opponent context: ufc

R3 (5:00)
UFC 312: Du Plessis vs. Strickland 2 — Feb 8, 2025
W
Phil Rowe
Decision — Unanimous

Opponent context: ufc

R3 (5:00)
UFC 302: Makhachev vs. Poirier — Jun 1, 2024
Pattern

Four wins in five, with stable output and a changed grappling game. Over the last five fights he landed 3.54 and absorbed 2.63 significant strikes a minute (career 3.36 / 2.58) at +10.8 a fight, and he has absorbed no knockdowns in seven fights. Takedown offence has collapsed to 0.51 per 15 (1.46 in bouts 4–24), while control has risen to 50.2% of fight time over the last three, because it now comes off the other man's failed shots: Harris went 0 for 3 and conceded 9:30 of control. The warning column is opponent takedowns. The last five landed only 4 of 15 on him, but the one who landed three, Magny, beat him — as Semelsberger, the last opponent before Magny to land three, did in December 2022, before this stretch began.

Tahir Abdullayev

W
Jefferson Nascimento
KO/TKO — Punches (ground-and-pound)

Opponent context: prospect

R3 (4:28)
UFC Fight Night: Fiziev vs. Torres — Jun 27, 2026 (UFC debut for both; Nascimento 13-0, LFA interim LW champion, on short notice)
W
Siavash Dadras
Submission — Guillotine

Opponent context: prospect

R2 (4:40)
GFC 33 (Georgian Fighting Championship) — Oct 25, 2025 (Dadras 1-1)
W
Alimjon Shadmanov
Submission — Shoulder choke

Opponent context: prospect

R1 (3:23)
NGF 5 (New Generation Fighting) — Sep 13, 2025 (Shadmanov on a five-fight losing streak)
W
Shokhruz Rakhmatov
Submission — North-south choke

Opponent context: prospect

R1 (4:12)
Fight Nights 127 — Aug 16, 2025
W
Oleg Kosinov
KO/TKO — Punches

Opponent context: prospect

R1 (1:04)
Ural FC — Jun 14, 2025
Pattern

Five straight wins, four of them inside two rounds and three by choke before the UFC, but the regional opposition was thin: a Shadmanov finish one preview described as 'from the wrong side, basically squeezing him into submission' came against an opponent on a five-fight skid, then a 1-1 opponent 'that many North American commissions might have refused to sanction.' Nascimento was the real test and it was closer than the result. Out-landed 22-11 over ten minutes at 25% accuracy (16% to the head) and 0 of 2 on takedowns, he 'came running out' in Round 3, landed 2 of 4 takedowns and 19 ground strikes, and got the stoppage at 4:28. The market had priced a coin flip (opened +170, closed −105 to +140).

Jake Matthews

Win Methods
Wins by Round

Tahir Abdullayev

Win Methods
Wins by Round
Critical Insight
Both donuts, both round charts and the finish-threat curve below are career-scoped: all 23 of Matthews' professional wins (5 KO + 9 Sub + 9 Dec, rounded by largest remainder) and all 20 of Tahir's (11 KO + 7 Sub + 2 Dec). Tahir's 90% finish rate is almost all regional: ten of his eighteen finishes came in Round 1, but his one UFC finish came at 4:28 of Round 3 after ten slow minutes. Matthews' finishing clusters in Round 2 (seven of fourteen), and his UFC ledger is 2 KO + 6 Sub + 8 Dec. The overlap is on the mat: Matthews' six UFC submissions are five rear-naked chokes and a triangle; Tahir's seven include two guillotines, a shoulder choke and a north-south choke, and nine of his eleven KO/TKO wins came by punches, the UFC one from top position.

Opposition strength (no shared opponents)

Without a reliable shared-opponent table, compare who each fighter has been tested against using SOS tier, UFC sample size, and recent elite-tier form — not raw records alone.

FactorJakeTahir
Strength of schedule (SOS tier)Mid-division — 1-3 against opponents unbeaten in the UFC with 3+ wins (−12.0 sig/fight); 6-4 against established veterans; 9-1 against fringe or debuting opponents (+19.4 sig/fight)Regional — 18-0 with 16 finishes against regional opposition; 2-3 in title fights or against UFC-level opponents (W Alkhasov, Nascimento; L Bogatov, Togo, Boynazarov)
UFC sample16-8 across 24 bouts since June 2014 (12-5 at welterweight, 4-3 at lightweight)1-0 — one bout, June 2026
Recent ranked / elite touches (last 5)0 elite · 3 veteran tier0 elite · 0 veteran tier
Form-window difficulty edge: Fighter A (6 vs 5 tier points in listed bouts).
Last three opponentsCarlston Harris, Neil Magny, Chidi NjokuaniJefferson Nascimento, Siavash Dadras, Alimjon Shadmanov
  • No common opponents — and no prior meeting: No opponent appears on both professional records, and no opponent of Matthews appears within two steps of Tahir's record. The links below are indirect, on Tahir's side only, and are context rather than evidence.
  • Indirect link, not a common opponent — Jefferson Nascimento: Nascimento (13-0, the LFA interim lightweight champion) took the bout on short notice, 29 days after a Round-4 body-kick KO at LFA 234 and up a weight class. He is booked against Nazim Sadykhov on November 14, one week before this fight. A win there adds weight to Tahir's debut; a heavy loss removes some.
  • Indirect link — Roman Bogatov and Josh Togo: Bogatov later reached the UFC and lost a decision to Leonardo Santos at UFC 251 (2020); Togo had been stopped by Jamie Mullarkey, later a UFC lightweight, in 2018. They place Tahir's losses at roughly regional-champion or UFC-fringe level. None of it involves Matthews.
03

The Numbers

Composites, division ranks and round-by-round evidence

Composite scores summarize selected statistics on a 0–100 scale. They are not win probabilities. Compare the underlying metrics, opponent quality and UFC experience before interpreting a score difference as a matchup advantage.

Striking

SLpM 25% · StrAcc 30% · StrDef 30% · SApM 15%

0
Jake
0
Tahirfew UFC fights

Eight points to Matthews, on a measured line against a one-fight line. Matthews lands only 3.36 a minute (rank 44 of 54) at 44% and just 38.2% at distance, but defends 60% (rank 5) and absorbs 2.58 (rank 9), a damage ratio of 1.30 on 925 landed and 710 absorbed. Tahir's 2.56 at 42% is flattered by Round 3's ground strikes (19 of 26); standing, he landed 14 of 55. His 51% defence is below the 53.7% mean, and Nascimento landed 19 of 26 body strikes on him. The one thing the formula misses is in Tahir's favour: he has never been stopped by strikes in 23 fights.

Grappling

TD/15 25% · TDAcc 25% · TDDef 30% · Sub/15 20%

0
Jake
0
Tahirfew UFC fights

Close, and closer than the rate lines look. Tahir is the more willing wrestler (6.2 attempts per 15 against Matthews' 3.3) with a heavy top game: 3:12 of control and 19 ground strikes in one round. Matthews is the better submission grappler by a clear margin, with six UFC submissions, a guillotine threat in ~24% of his rounds and 73 seconds of control per round. Tahir's 100% takedown defence is one stuffed attempt, and his 0.00 Sub/15 comes from one fight.

Technical

(Striking + Grappling) / 2

0.0
Jake
0.0
Tahirfew UFC fights

About five points to Matthews: striking goes to him on accuracy and defence, grappling is near even, with Matthews ahead on submissions and Tahir ahead on takedown volume and top pressure.

Cardio

Fight time · pace · R3/R1 output · long fights

0
Jake
0
Tahirfew UFC fights

A slight lean to Matthews on proven minutes. He has 275:41 of UFC cage time, sixteen of 24 UFC fights reached Round 3, eleven went the full fifteen, and his control rises 55 → 75 → 97 seconds by round while his striking fades to 76% of Round 1 (a 'Slight Fade' profile). Tahir's best UFC round was his last, and he has lasted two 25-minute title fights, but he lost both on the cards. Whether his slow first ten minutes at Baku were pacing or a fighter who needs time to find range, one fight cannot settle.

Overall

(Technical + Cardio) / 2

0.0
Jake
0.0
Tahirfew UFC fights

A gap of about 4.5 points, consistent with a low-60s Matthews number. The composite does not see the takedown threshold in Matthews' record (0-3 when an opponent lands two or more), which is the main reason the split stops short of two-to-one.

MetricJakeTahir
Avg Fight Time11:29 (24 UFC bouts)14:28 (one bout)few UFC fights
Pace Tier3.36 SLpM — a point below the 4.38 mean (rank 44/54)2.56 SLpM — 11 landed in the first ten minutes at Bakufew UFC fights
First Ten Minutes16.6 + 15.8 sig landed on average in R1–R25 + 6 landed at Baku; out-landed 11-22few UFC fights
R3/R1 Output76% — 'Slight Fade'; control rises to 97 sec5 → 26 landed; all 3:12 of control in R3few UFC fights
Long FightsEleven full 15:00 UFC decisions (8-3)Two 25:00 title fights, both lost on the cards
Control / Round73 sec64 sec (all of it in R3)few UFC fights

Archetype Base Rate

Positional Grappler / Counter-Boxer 50%50% Pressure Grappler

No archetype base rate applied · No historical archetype win rate is used for this pairing, so the bar sits at a neutral 50/50. The 62/38 lean comes from the matchup evidence: striking defence and opposition tiers for Matthews, weighed against the takedown threshold that is Tahir's path.

Jake MatthewsTahir Abdullayev

Welterweight

· 54 fighters
StatJakeJake rankDiv avgTahir rankTahir
SLpM3.36
44/54
4.38—2.56
Str Acc44%
35/54
48.7%—42%
Str Def60%
5/54elite
53.7%—51%
SApM2.58
9/54
3.89—2.42
KD Avg0.33—0.52—0.00
Damage Ratio1.30—1.22—1.06
TD/151.36
24/54
1.64—2.07
TD Acc41% (25 of 60)———33% (2 of 6)
TD Def66% (14 of 42 conceded)———100% (1 attempt faced)
Sub/150.70
14/54
0.47—0.00
Control / Round73 sec———64 sec (all in R3)
Avg Fight Time11:29———14:28
Statistical Verdict
The measured striking columns belong to Matthews: accuracy, defence (5th of 54), absorption (9th), damage ratio, and the single number that best describes the Baku tape, Tahir's 25.5% at distance. The grappling-volume columns lean to Tahir: more takedown attempts, more top pressure and a far higher share of ground strikes (51% of his UFC output against Matthews' 21%). His 100% takedown defence and his 2.42 absorbed a minute look elite and are not: one stuffed attempt, and one slow first round. Matthews' own weakness in the table is output: he lands a full point below the welterweight mean and wins on defence, not volume. The split rests on three lines this table cannot show — Matthews 9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents, Tahir 2-3 whenever he has stepped up, and the takedown threshold, which is the only path that runs clearly toward Tahir.

Significant Strikes Landed per Round

⚠ R1, R2, R3: single-fight sample for Tahir Abdullayev

Control Time per Round (sec)

Jake Matthews

  • Output is flat and defensive: 16.6 → 15.8 → 13.2 significant strikes on average, roughly three a minute, with his best accuracy in Round 2 (49.8%). At distance he lands only 38.2% across his career; the damage comes later and lower, at 70.9% accuracy on the ground.
  • He turns into a grappler as the fight goes on: control rises 55 → 75 → 97 seconds, ground share 16.9% → 19.0% → 31.8%, and submission attempts 0.17 → 0.31 per round. Round 3 is also his knockdown round (0.19).
  • Round 3 cuts both ways. Two of his UFC submission wins came there (Dashon Johnson, Johnny Case), and so did three of his four submission losses (Martin, Brady, Magny).

Tahir Abdullayev

  • Rounds 1 and 2 at Baku: 11 landed from 44 (25%), 6 of 38 to the head, almost all of it at range, with zero control and 0 of 2 takedowns. Nascimento landed 22 in the same ten minutes, 10 of them to the body.
  • Round 3 (4:28): 26 of 43 landed (60.5%), 19 of them ground strikes at 73%, 2 of 4 takedowns and 3:12 of control, then the stoppage. It was the only round in which he committed to wrestling — and he absorbed 9 of 9 body strikes in it.
  • One bout, one round each. The shape — slow for ten minutes, dominant for five — may be his style or one fight's problem-solving against a lateral mover. His regional record points the other way: ten of his eighteen finishes came in Round 1.
Critical Insight
The two tables have the same shape: both men turn into grapplers as the fight goes on. Matthews' ground share climbs to 31.8% and his control to 97 seconds by Round 3; Tahir went from zero control and zero ground strikes in ten minutes to 3:12 and 19 ground strikes in 4:28. The difference is the first ten minutes. Matthews wins Rounds 1 and 2 on jab, defence and opportunistic top position, and Tahir's Rounds 1 and 2 at Baku were the weakest ten minutes on either man's recent tape. If that pattern repeats, Matthews banks two rounds and Tahir's third round has to be a finish rather than a 10-9.

Strike targeting

Jake

Head
72%
Body
17%
Legs
11%

Tahir

Head
70%
Body
22%
Legs
8%

Head hunting vs body work vs leg attack — the shape of the damage.

Striking range — distance, clinch and ground

JakeTahir
72%Distance38%
7%Clinch11%
21%Ground51%

Share of significant strikes landed at distance, in the clinch and on the ground across each fighter's UFC rounds, weighted by strike volume.

04

The Story of the Fight

Advantages, worst cases, gameplans — and the patterns underneath

Where the fight lives

Who owns each phase — and by how much
Open SpaceJake owns it

60% striking defence (rank 5/54) and a counter right against 25.5% accuracy at distance; Nascimento out-landed Tahir 22-11 for ten minutes

Pocket / ExchangesJake owns it

Matthews times entries and has absorbed no knockdowns in seven fights — tempered by Tahir never having been stopped by strikes in 23 fights

Clinch / FenceTahir owns it

Tahir's body-lock entries produced both Baku takedowns and he needs the fence; almost all of Matthews' takedown attempts are clinch-derived too, so this is the contested lane

GroundEven

On top, Tahir's ground-and-pound (19 of 26 at Baku); in scrambles and off his back, Matthews' black belt (6 UFC subs, 70.9% ground accuracy). Whoever is on top after the first scramble owns it

The Deep Read

Tahir's UFC debut is the only UFC evidence on his side, and it needs reading carefully. Three complaints attach to it. Referee Jim Perdios stopped it at 4:28 of Round 3 during a burst of hammerfists while Nascimento was still defending (Cageside Press: 'way too early'; Nascimento sprang up to protest). Fans pointed to an ear-bite moment about a minute before the finish that MMA Mania called 'inconclusive at best', with no accusation from Nascimento and no sanction reported. And it was a card opener in Baku with an Azerbaijani fighter. None of that changes the result. The round-by-round numbers say more. Nascimento — 13-0, the LFA interim lightweight champion, taking the fight on short notice 29 days after his last bout and moving up a weight — out-landed Tahir 22-11 across Rounds 1 and 2, landed 19 of 26 body strikes on him, and stuffed the only takedown Tahir tried in each round. Then Tahir 'came running out' in Round 3, caught a leg, timed a second takedown whenever Nascimento opened up, and landed 19 ground strikes and 3:12 of control before the stoppage. The honest reading is 'lost the striking for ten minutes, won the grappling for five', and the market had priced it as a coin flip: Tahir opened +170 and closed between −105 and +140.

Matthews' record sorts cleanly by opponent quality. Against opponents unbeaten in the UFC with three or more wins (Vick, Case, Brady, Morales) he is 1-3 at −12.0 significant strikes a fight; against established veterans, 6-4; against fringe or debuting opponents, 9-1 at +19.4. Tahir, with one UFC bout, sits in that last tier by construction, and his own record sorts the same way: 18-0 against the regional scene, 2-3 when he stepped up. What has changed with age is how Matthews grapples. His takedown offence has fallen from 1.46 per 15 minutes in bouts 4–24 to 0.51, one takedown in his last three fights, while his control has risen to half of all fight time over those three, because his grappling now starts from the other man's shot. The Harris fight is the template: Harris went 0 for 3, Matthews landed no takedowns of his own, and he still banked 9:30 of control, a knockdown and several submission threats. The Magny fight is the warning: Magny landed 3 of 5, two of them in Round 3 after a right hand hurt Matthews, and the D'Arce followed.

Put the two records side by side and the fight reduces to one question: does Tahir land two takedowns and hold Matthews down? Attempts alone do not beat Matthews. Prado and Case each shot six times, landed once and lost. Landing does: Holbrook, Semelsberger and Magny each landed two or three, and all three won. Tahir's profile sits right on that edge, with six attempts in 14:28 but none of his first two landed, and both successes coming in Round 3 against a natural lightweight who was opening up with strikes. The mat is contested from both sides. All four of Matthews' submission losses are front-headlock or head-and-arm chokes (Vick's guillotine, Martin's anaconda, Brady's arm-triangle, Magny's D'Arce), and four of Tahir's seven submissions are in the same family. That front headlock is the most contested square on the board, and Matthews has far more reps there. Neither man gets knocked out standing — Tahir has never been stopped by strikes in 23 fights, Matthews once in 31 — so this fight should end on the cards or on the mat.

Path to Victory

Jake Matthews

Win the first ten minutes at range the way Nascimento did, and turn every Tahir shot into a front-headlock or back-take chance. He loses this fight mainly if he gives up two takedowns and carries the bottom position — he is 0-3 when that happens.

Why they win
01
Striking defence against an entry fighter

60% striking defence (rank 5 of 54) and a counter straight right against an opponent who landed 25.5% at distance in his UFC debut and, per Cageside Press, 'would eat something' every time he blitzed in. Tahir paws behind his lead hand and steps in behind a front kick; that is the entry Matthews counters.

02
A black belt's front headlock against a volume shooter

Six UFC submissions, a guillotine threat in ~24% of his rounds, and a back-take game that punishes level changes. Tahir attempted 6.2 takedowns per 15 minutes in the UFC and landed none of his first two. Every shot from range is a chance at the neck.

03
The tier he beats

9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents at +19.4 significant strikes a fight, with 24 UFC bouts and 275 minutes of Octagon time against Tahir's 14:28. The one loss in that tier, Andrew Holbrook in 2016, was a grappler who landed 2 of 2 takedowns.

04
Recent takedown defence

His last five opponents landed 4 of 15. Harris went 0 for 3 and gave up 9:30 of control, the template for how Matthews turns an opponent's wrestling into his own top time.

05
Form, frame and a chin that has held

The Harris decision (30-25 on one card, a knockdown and several submission threats) was one of the most complete of his career. He has three inches of height, has carried 170 since 2017, and has absorbed no knockdowns in the seven fights since Semelsberger.

The gameplan
  1. 1
    Counter the entry

    Tahir paws, then steps in behind a front kick or a blitz. Time the straight right on the step in, not on the exit.

  2. 2
    Make him shoot from range

    Every distance shot is a chance at the front headlock. What Matthews cannot do is give up two takedowns and carry the bottom position.

  3. 3
    Attack the body

    Nascimento landed 19 of 26 body strikes on Tahir, all nine he threw in Round 3. Only 17% of Matthews' significant strikes go to the body; this is the fight to raise it.

  4. 4
    Bank Rounds 1 and 2, then hunt

    Win the first ten minutes on volume and defence, then hunt in Round 3, when his control (97 seconds) and submission attempts (0.31) peak and Tahir will be chasing.

  5. 5
    Get up immediately if taken down

    His losses to Kevin Lee, Holbrook, Brady, Semelsberger and Magny all came with the opponent banking 2:30 or more of control. Work to the front headlock on the stand-up, the position that produced his mounted guillotine threat on Magny.

Path to Victory

Tahir Abdullayev

Land two takedowns and hold him there. Matthews has never beaten an opponent who landed two, and he is 2-5 when an opponent banks 2:30 of control. Shoot early and from the clinch, not from open space into the front headlock.

Why they win
01
The takedown threshold

Matthews is 0-3 when an opponent lands two or more takedowns, 4-2 when exactly one, and 12-3 when none. He is 2-5 when an opponent banks 2:30 or more of control, and Tahir banked 3:12 in a single round at Baku. His attempt rate projects about two takedowns in fifteen minutes.

02
A heavy top game

19 of 26 ground strikes landed in Round 3 at Baku, a UFC finish by ground-and-pound, and seven career submissions. Matthews' two worst recent losses (Magny, Semelsberger) came with three opponent takedowns each.

03
The choke overlap

All four of Matthews' submission losses are front-headlock or head-and-arm chokes (guillotine, anaconda, arm-triangle, D'Arce). Four of Tahir's seven submissions are in the same family: two guillotines, a shoulder choke and a north-south choke.

04
Durability

Never stopped by strikes in 23 professional fights; his only stoppage loss is a 2018 arm-triangle. Nascimento landed 35 significant strikes on him, 19 to the body, without a knockdown, and he 'never stopped applying pressure' (LowKick MMA).

05
Age, activity and a late surge

29 against 32, seven fights in three years, five straight wins. His best UFC round was his last, and Round 3 is where Matthews has lost three times by submission.

The gameplan
  1. 1
    Shoot early, not late

    At Baku he waited until Round 3 to commit to takedowns. Against Matthews, a 0-for-2 first ten minutes means he is down 2-0.

  2. 2
    Chain from the clinch, not from open space

    Pin Matthews to the fence, head inside, and work the body lock. Distance shots feed the front headlock.

  3. 3
    Keep the head up on every level change

    Matthews threatens the guillotine in ~24% of his rounds, and his back-take chokes account for five of his six UFC submissions.

  4. 4
    Stay on top and land

    3:12 of control and ground strikes won Baku. Do not chase a submission early; his UFC finish came from staying heavy and landing.

  5. 5
    Do not box at range

    25.5% at distance against a 60% defender is a losing trade. If the takedowns are being stuffed, go to the body and the legs and make Matthews be the one who engages.

Danger Zone

How Jake Matthews loses

  • Magny's third round, earlier: Tahir lands the first takedown in Round 1, Matthews scrambles up, Tahir lands the second, and Matthews spends the fight carrying a stronger man's weight. That is the pattern that is 0-3.

  • The Baku ending: down a round, Tahir comes out running in Round 3, catches a leg, and Matthews' guard does not stop the hammerfists.

  • A choke from the scramble: Matthews reaches for the head, Tahir pops out on top, and the shoulder choke or north-south choke that finished Shadmanov and Rakhmatov arrives against a neck that has been caught four times.

Danger Zone

How Tahir Abdullayev loses

  • Nascimento with a guard: he walks forward, bites on feints, eats straight rights, goes 0 for 2 on takedowns in the first ten minutes as he did at Baku, and this time the man across from him is a black belt when the shots finally come.

  • The front headlock: he shoots from too far out, his head stays in front, and the guillotine Matthews nearly finished Magny with finishes him. His own two guillotine wins say he knows the position; they do not say he has defended it against a black belt.

  • Another step-up loss on the cards: he loses the range exchanges, his takedowns are stuffed or reversed, and the better-rounded fighter wins the decision, as Togo and Boynazarov did.

Matthews' record, sorted by opponent takedowns landed

Two Takedowns Is the Line

Matthews is 12-3 when an opponent lands no takedowns, 4-2 when exactly one, and 0-3 when two or more (Holbrook 2, Semelsberger 3, Magny 3). Tahir's Baku attempt rate (6.2 per 15) against Matthews' 66% takedown defence projects about 2.1 takedowns over fifteen minutes. That is a crude projection, but it lands exactly on the line — and Matthews' last five opponents landed only 4 of 15.

0-3
Matthews when an opponent lands 2+ takedowns (12-3 when none)
Opposition quality, both ways

His Best Tier Against Tahir's Worst Split

Matthews is 9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents (fewer than five UFC bouts or under .500 on fight night), out-landing them by 19.4 significant strikes a fight; Tahir, one bout into his UFC career, sits in that tier by construction. Tahir's own record sorts the same way: 18-0 with 16 finishes against regional opposition, 2-3 against title-level or UFC-bound opponents, and every one of his three losses came in the biggest fight he had taken at the time.

9-1
Matthews vs fringe or debuting UFC opponents (+19.4 sig strikes a fight)
What the Baku rounds show

Ten Minutes of Nascimento

In his only UFC bout Tahir was out-landed 22-11 over the first ten minutes, at 25% accuracy overall and 16% to the head, by a natural lightweight who had fought 29 days earlier. He went 0 of 2 on takedowns in that span. At distance for the whole fight he landed 14 of 55 (25.5%), and he absorbed 19 of 26 body strikes (73%), including 9 of 9 in Round 3.

11-22
Tahir's significant strikes vs Nascimento's through two rounds
Why volume alone does not beat Matthews

Control, Not Attempts

Matthews is 2-5 when an opponent banks 2:30 or more of control and 14-3 otherwise. Opponents who shot five or more times are only 2-2 against him: Prado and Case each landed one of six and lost. The swing variable is Tahir's accuracy (2 of 6, both in Round 3), not his volume. Meanwhile Matthews' own takedowns have fallen to 0.51 per 15, but his control share over his last three fights is 50.2%, taken from the other man's failed shots.

2-5
Matthews when an opponent banks 2:30+ of control (14-3 otherwise)
The most contested square on the board

The Same Family of Chokes

All four of Matthews' submission losses — Vick's guillotine (2015), Martin's anaconda (2018), Brady's arm-triangle (2021), Magny's D'Arce (2025) — are front-headlock or head-and-arm chokes, and three came in Round 3. Four of Tahir's seven submission wins are in the same family: guillotines on Lyapunov and Dadras, a shoulder choke on Shadmanov, a north-south choke on Rakhmatov. The front headlock is where both men win; the model gives Matthews 20% by submission against Tahir's 8% because he has far more reps there.

4 of 4
Matthews' submission losses that are front-headlock or head-and-arm chokes

The Five-Round Clock

Jake Matthews danger windowTahir Abdullayev danger windowNeutral / contested
R1 · 0:00–5:00Matthews' range round

Tahir's UFC Round 1 was 5 landed from 20 with no takedown, and he 'struggled to cut off' a lateral mover. Matthews averages 16.6 significant strikes in Round 1, and both of his first-round UFC finishes (Anzai, Njokuani) were chokes. The blue branch: Tahir finished ten of his eighteen regional wins in Round 1, and an early clinch takedown would bring the Baku third round ten minutes early.

Critical Insight
Matthews needs the first ten minutes to look like Nascimento's; Tahir needs the third round at Baku to arrive in the first. The finish equity rises every round, and it rises faster for Tahir, because Baku says his wrestling arrives late and Round 3 is where Matthews has been submitted three times. But if Matthews banks Rounds 1 and 2 on counters and failed shots, Tahir's best round only buys him a 29-28 loss unless it ends the fight.

Finish Threat by Round

Share of each fighter's wins that end in each round — early finishers spike left, grinders rise right.

05

The Verdict

One hundred simulated fights, the betting market, and our conviction

If you only read 3 things
1

Matthews (23-8, 16-8 UFC) is 9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents; Tahir (20-3) has one UFC bout, a disputed Round-3 TKO of Jefferson Nascimento in which he was out-landed 22-11 over the first ten minutes.

2

The one path that runs clearly to Tahir is wrestling: Matthews is 0-3 when an opponent lands two or more takedowns, and Tahir's attempt rate projects about two.

3

Model: Matthews 62% / Tahir 38%, conviction 3/10 (capped by Tahir's 14:28 of UFC experience). The likeliest single outcome is a Matthews decision (34 of 100); Matthews by submission (20) is next.

Model outcomes per 100 fights

Each square represents one percentage point of the model distribution, not an observed fight. This visualization does not measure model accuracy or reduce uncertainty in the inputs.

Matthews Decision — 34%Matthews Submission — 20%Tahir Decision — 18%Tahir KO/TKO — 12%Matthews KO/TKO — 8%Tahir Submission — 8%

Each square = 1 simulated fight. Jake Matthews gold · Tahir Abdullayev orange · full color = decision, 70% = submission, 45% = KO/TKO.

The two-takedown line

Matthews is 0-3 when opponents land two or more takedowns and 2-5 when they bank 2:30 or more of control. Tahir's Baku rate projects about 2.1 takedowns in fifteen minutes. This single split is why Tahir is at 38% and not 25%, and it drives his decision bucket (18).

Range striking and the first ten minutes

Matthews' 60% defence and counter right against an entry fighter who landed 25.5% at distance and was out-landed 22-11 through two rounds of his debut. It is the core of the Matthews decision bucket (34), the largest on the page.

The front headlock against a volume shooter

Six UFC submissions and a guillotine and back-take game against 6.2 takedown attempts per 15 minutes. It is spread across all three rounds (6 / 7 / 7) because Tahir shoots in every round, and it makes up Matthews' 20% by submission.

Opposition tiers

Matthews 9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents; Tahir 2-3 against title-level or UFC-bound opposition, having lost as a heavy favourite to Togo. The strongest single line behind the Matthews lean.

A 14:28 UFC career

Every Tahir rate comes from one fight against one short-notice opponent. That is reflected in the conviction (3/10) rather than in the buckets, because it cuts both ways: Baku could be hiding a better or a worse fighter.

Fight Scripts

0%
of simulations

Nascimento With a Guard

Matthews counters the pawing entries, makes Tahir shoot from range, stuffs or reverses most of the attempts, and wins two or three rounds on defence, volume and control that starts from the other man's failed takedowns, as it did against Harris. Tahir survives, as he always has against strikes, and loses on the cards.

Scripted outcomes for Jake Matthews vs Tahir Abdullayev — how each version of this fight unfolds.

Jake Matthews win probability
0%
8%
34%
20%
KO/TKODECSUB
  • Eight points: a counter right on an entry or ground strikes from top. Trimmed because Tahir has never been stopped by strikes in 23 fights, and Matthews has two KO/TKO wins in 24 UFC bouts, though he did drop Harris in May.

  • The largest bucket at 34 (fair +194). Eleven full 15-minute UFC fights, eight UFC decision wins, 60% striking defence against an opponent who landed 25% at range, and an opponent who does not get stopped by strikes. The Harris fight — 55-27, 9:30 of control off the other man's shots — is what it looks like when it goes well.

  • Twenty points (fair +400) for the black belt and the specific counter Tahir's shots invite: front headlock, guillotine, back take. Spread across rounds (6 / 7 / 7) because Tahir shoots in every round.

Tahir Abdullayev win probability
0%
12%
18%
8%
KO/TKODECSUB
  • Twelve points, almost entirely ground-and-pound — the Baku finish — weighted to Round 3 (5 of 12). Matthews has been stopped by strikes once in 31 fights, and that was from top position (Kevin Lee, 2016).

  • His most repeatable path at 18 (fair +456): land two takedowns, hold top position, win two rounds. It is the outcome Matthews' 0-3 split describes.

  • Eight points (fair +1150): the choke-family scramble, a guillotine, shoulder choke or north-south choke off a Matthews reach for the head, weighted to Round 3 (4 of 8), where Matthews has been submitted three times.

Projected Scorecards

How the model scores each round
R1
Jake
R2
Jake
R3
Tahir
29-28 Matthews
Matthews banks Rounds 1 and 2 on counters and failed Tahir shots; Tahir takes the third on top
The modal card — Matthews' round curve against the Baku one
30-27 Matthews
The Harris template: every Tahir shot feeds the front headlock and Matthews rides the reversals
Live if the early takedowns are stuffed (his last five opponents: 4 of 15)
29-28 Tahir
Two takedowns and heavy top time in two rounds — the split Matthews is 0-3 in
Tahir's decision path — 18 of his 38 win-shares

Model and price

Jake Matthews

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
62%
Fair odds
-163
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
1.61
Estimated EV
—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

Tahir Abdullayev

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
38%
Fair odds
+163
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
2.63
Estimated EV
—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

EV uses the displayed price: probability × decimal odds − 1. Edge is a percentage-point difference from a proportionally de-vigged, same-book pair. A dash means that comparison is unavailable.

Price freshness & calculation notes

Quotes older than 48 hours are marked outdated. EV at an old or undated price is a historical calculation, not a current opportunity. Date-only snapshots have no verified capture time.

Fair odds are the break-even price under this estimate, not a recommended entry price. Model uncertainty can erase a small edge.

What price would change the calculation? · Jake Matthews

Change the assumptions to see how the required price moves. This does not update the published model or recommend an entry price.

Required decimal price: 1.62 or higher. At the exact unrounded break-even price, estimated EV is zero.

What price would change the calculation? · Tahir Abdullayev

Change the assumptions to see how the required price moves. This does not update the published model or recommend an entry price.

Required decimal price: 2.64 or higher. At the exact unrounded break-even price, estimated EV is zero.

Original analyst price notes

These notes describe the original analysis and may refer to older prices.

With no line posted, the lean is a set of price thresholds, not a bet. Matthews has value at −150 or longer (60% implied or less against the model's 62%); a 24-fight UFC veteran against a one-fight debutant is likely to open shorter than that, in which case the side is a pass. Tahir becomes the value side at +190 or longer (34.5% implied or less against 38%), a price the market could plausibly hang on a regional champion with a controversial debut. The prop we like most is Matthews by submission at +450 or longer (model 20%, fair +400): it is the path Tahir's shooting invites, and books tend to price Matthews as a decision fighter. Matthews by decision is fair at +194 (34%); the fight going the distance is fair at −108 (52%). The prop to avoid is Tahir inside the distance at a short price (model 20%, fair +400): his one UFC finish came late and under protest, and Matthews has been stopped by strikes once in 31 fights. Model fight-end rounds: R1 14%, R2 15%, R3 19%.

Conviction
0
3/10

Editorial confidence in the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

A lean on Matthews' measured striking edge, his record against this tier of opponent and his submission game against a volume shooter, capped at 3. Tahir has one UFC bout and 14:28 of cage time, which caps conviction on its own. The specific risk the cap protects against is also the one the numbers identify: Tahir only has to land two takedowns and hold position for Matthews' worst split to take over. Lean: Jake Matthews.

What backs the lean
  • 9-1 against fringe or debuting UFC opponents at +19.4 significant strikes a fight; Tahir is 2-3 against title-level or UFC-bound opposition.

  • Tahir was out-landed 22-11 over the first ten minutes of his UFC debut and landed 25.5% at distance, against a 60% defender (rank ~5/54) with a counter right.

  • A black belt's front headlock and six UFC submissions against 6.2 takedown attempts per 15 minutes.

  • Recent takedown defence of 4 of 15 conceded in his last five fights, and 24 UFC bouts and 275 minutes of cage time against 14:28.

What limits it
  • Matthews is 0-3 when opponents land two or more takedowns and 2-5 when they bank 2:30+ of control; Tahir banked 3:12 in one round at Baku.

  • A heavy top game: 19 of 26 ground strikes in Round 3 at Baku and seven career submissions, four in the same choke family that has beaten Matthews four times.

  • Never stopped by strikes in 23 fights, which narrows Matthews' route to an early finish.

  • 29 against 32, five straight wins, and a steep Round-3 curve against a fighter who has lost three times in Round 3 — all from one UFC fight that could understate him.

Final Assessment

In roughly 62 of 100 simulations, Jake Matthews does to Tahir what Nascimento did for ten minutes, and then does what Nascimento could not. Most often it goes the distance (34%): Matthews counters the pawing entries, makes Tahir shoot from range, stuffs or reverses most of the attempts, and wins two rounds on defence, volume and control that starts from the other man's failed takedowns, as it did against Harris. The version that exposes the gap is the front headlock (20%): Tahir shoots, the head stays in front, and the guillotine or back take finishes it, in any round. A small remainder comes from a counter right on an entry or ground strikes from top (8%).

In the other 38, Tahir Abdullayev turns the fight into the third round at Baku. The most common version is a decision (18%): he lands the two takedowns Matthews has never survived, holds top position for two rounds, and the cards follow. The loudest version is ground-and-pound (12%), most often late, when both men are grappling and Tahir is on top. The version that would surprise the market is the choke (8%): a scramble off Matthews' front headlock that ends with Tahir's arm-in choke, the same family of submission that has beaten Matthews four times.

The data gives Matthews the striking defence, the submission game, the experience and a 9-1 record against opponents at Tahir's level of UFC experience. It gives Tahir the takedown volume, the top pressure, the durability and the one split in Matthews' record that has never gone his way. On November 21 in Doha we take Jake Matthews, at 62% and a capped conviction of 3. The call rests on Tahir's first ten minutes at Baku, and it is wrong if his third round shows up in the first.

Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.