Matheus Camilo vs Jai Herbert – UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan Fight Analytics & Prediction

PRELIM · LIGHTWEIGHT · 3 ROUNDSUFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan

Matheus Camilo

11W3L

Control Wrestler

…

Jai Herbert

14W6L1D

Long-Range Knockout Striker

…

Seven and a half inches of reach against four takedowns a round, in a twenty-five-foot cage

LightweightUFC Apex, Las Vegas, Nevada, United StatesOctober 10, 2026UFC Apex — 25ft cage

The Frame

What this fight is really about — and the measurements that shape it

The Analyst's Take

A clean styles fight with the venue pressing hard on one side of it. Jai Herbert is 6'1" with a 77-inch reach — the largest frame at UFC Vegas 122 — and has ten career knockouts, most recently a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo in April 2026. Matheus Camilo is 25, gives up seven and a half inches, lands only 2.22 significant strikes per minute, and attempts 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes with 67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds. Herbert attempts 0.42. That mismatch would matter anywhere and it matters more here: the Apex cage is 25 feet across, five feet smaller than the event Octagon, and a seven-inch reach advantage needs room it will not get. The complication is that Camilo is not merely a grinder — he knocked out Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds in June 2026, which is the best win on either sheet — and that Herbert, at 38, still produces his best round last: 18.3 significant strikes landed in an average third with 74 seconds of control. Model: Camilo 55% / Herbert 45%, conviction 4/10.

Matheus Camilo

Attribute

Jai Herbert

2513 years

Age

5'10" (70")

Height

6'1" (73")

69.5"

Reach

+7.5" Herbert77"

Control wrestling behind a low-volume jab

Fighting Style

Long-range kickboxing — ten career knockouts

Rio Branco, Brazil

Origin

Wolverhampton, England

4.16

Takedowns / 15

0.42

67%

Striking Defence

53%

Two straight wins, the last a 91-second knockout

Recent Form

Coming off a first-round knockout of Mandel Nallo

Seven and a half inches of reach and three of height to Herbert — the largest frame gap at UFC Vegas 122, and the entire basis of his gameplan. He lands 75.0%, 79.6% and 88.2% of his offence at distance across the three rounds. Camilo's answer is not to solve the range but to remove it: 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes and control time peaking at 103 seconds. In a 30-foot Octagon that trade is roughly even. In the Apex's 25-foot cage, the man who has to cover distance has five fewer feet to cover.

Venue Factor
The UFC Apex uses a 25-foot cage rather than the 30-foot event Octagon — five fewer feet of retreat in every direction, which taxes range fighters and rewards anyone who wants a back against the fence. In this bout it is close to decisive: it shrinks the seven-and-a-half-inch reach advantage that is Herbert's only structural asset.

The Fighters

Careers, chins, schedules — and the form they bring into the cage

Matheus Camilo

Pro Record

11-3-0

UFC Record

2-1 across two scored Octagon bouts

Streak

Two consecutive wins

Finish Rate

64% (7 of 11 wins) — 5 KO/TKO, 2 submissions, 4 decisions

Avg Fight Time

8:25 in the UFC

Chin · Untested — never knocked outSOS · Rising fastControl wrestler

A 25-year-old Brazilian whose UFC run has gone exactly the way a control wrestler's should. Camilo lost his Octagon debut to Gabe Green by second-round submission in May 2025, then took a unanimous decision over Viacheslav Borshchev at UFC 322 in November and knocked out Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds in June 2026. That last result is the one that matters — Sadykhov is a genuinely dangerous lightweight and Camilo removed him in a round and a half. The rate line is unusual: 2.22 significant strikes landed per minute is very low, but so is 3.05 absorbed, and 67% striking defence is well above the divisional baseline. What he actually does is wrestle — 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes with 67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds.

Jai Herbert

Pro Record

14-6-1

UFC Record

4-5-1 across nine scored Octagon bouts

Streak

Coming off a first-round knockout of Mandel Nallo

Finish Rate

79% (11 of 14 wins) — 10 KO/TKO, 1 submission, 3 decisions

Avg Fight Time

10:42 in the UFC

Chin · TestedSOS · Deep UFC lightweight scheduleLong-range knockout striker

One of the longest fighters at 155 pounds and, at 38, still capable of ending an evening in two minutes. Herbert holds the Cage Warriors lightweight title on his record and has gone 4-5-1 across nine scored UFC bouts, with a draw against Ludovit Klein and decision losses to Farés Ziam and Chris Padilla among them. His most recent appearance was the clearest statement of what he still has: a first-round knockout of Mandel Nallo at 2:05 in April 2026. Ten of his fourteen career wins came by strike. The round data shows a fighter who builds rather than fades — output climbing 11.6 to 13.5 to 18.3 and control time from 24 seconds to 74 — but also one whose knockdown average is front-loaded at 0.33 in the opening round and zero by the third.

Matheus Camilo

0 dealt · 0 absorbed

Knockdown Exchange

KD dealt vs absorbed

Jai Herbert

0 dealt · 0 absorbed

Matheus Camilosignature weapons

The Control Round67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds, off 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes against a 67% sprawl

×4

The Flash FinishA 91-second knockout of Nazim Sadykhov in June 2026 — the reason a 2.22-SLpM fighter cannot be treated as harmless

×5

Jai Herbertsignature weapons

Seven and a Half Inches77 inches against 69.5 — the largest reach gap at UFC Vegas 122 — with 75-88% of his offence landing at distance

×14

The Round-1 KnockoutTen career knockouts and a 0.33 opening-round knockdown average, most recently a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo

×10

Matheus Camilo

Nazim Sadykhov

KO/TKO

RR1 (1:31)

UFC FN: Fiziev vs. Torres — Jun 27, 2026

Viacheslav Borshchev

Decision — Unanimous

RR3

UFC 322 — Nov 15, 2025

Gabe Green

Submission

RR2 (3:43)

UFC FN: Burns vs. Morales — May 17, 2025

Dorobshokh Nabotov

Decision — Unanimous

RR3

Z-Fight Night 2 — Dec 14, 2024

Jhonasky Sojo

Decision — Unanimous

RR3

Tuff-N-Uff 139 — Oct 11, 2024

Pattern

Two straight wins and the second is a genuine statement — a 91-second knockout of Nazim Sadykhov, who had beaten several ranked lightweights. Before it, a clear decision over Viacheslav Borshchev. The Gabe Green submission loss in May 2025 is the only blemish and it is instructive: he was finished on the mat, which is the one place a wrestler with no published takedown defence is exposed.

Jai Herbert

Mandel Nallo

KO/TKO

RR1 (2:05)

UFC FN: Burns vs. Malott — Apr 18, 2026

Chris Padilla

Decision — Split

RR3

UFC FN: Edwards vs. Brady — Mar 22, 2025

Rolando Bedoya

Decision — Unanimous

RR3

UFC FN: Sandhagen vs. Nurmagomedov — Aug 3, 2024

Farés Ziam

Decision — Unanimous

RR3

UFC FN: Aspinall vs. Tybura — Jul 22, 2023

Ludovit Klein

Draw

RR3

UFC 286 — Mar 18, 2023

Pattern

One win in three coming into 2026, then a knockout that reset the conversation — Mandel Nallo in 125 seconds in April. The Chris Padilla split-decision loss and the Ludovit Klein draw are the shape of his career: he is competitive with everybody and finishes the ones who stand in front of him. Nobody has taken him down repeatedly, which is largely because nobody has tried.

Matheus Camilo

Win Methods

Wins by Round

Jai Herbert

Win Methods

Wins by Round

Critical Insight
Two very different charts and both close exactly — Camilo 5 knockouts, 2 submissions and 4 decisions in 11 wins; Herbert 10, 1 and 3 in 14. Seventy-one percent of everything Herbert has won came by strike and he has five first-round finishes; Camilo's spread is wider, with four decisions and two submissions alongside five knockouts. The round columns show the real asymmetry: Herbert has eleven finishes across three rounds and Camilo has seven, but Camilo is the only one of the two with a documented way to win a round without hurting anybody — 103 seconds of control is not on any donut chart.

Common Opponents

Opponent	Matheus	Jai
Mandel Nallo (also on the October calendar)	—never faced	W· KO/TKO R1 2:05 (Apr 2026)
Nallo fights Nate Landwehr at UFC Edmonton a week after this card; Herbert removed him in 125 seconds
Gabe Green (blueprint)	L· Submission R2 3:43 (May 2025)	—never faced
The only stoppage against Camilo, and it was a submission — the one phase where a low-output wrestler is genuinely exposed
Nazim Sadykhov (level proxy)	W· KO/TKO R1 1:31 (Jun 2026)	—never faced
Camilo's best win by a distance, and the reason a 2.22-strikes-per-minute fighter is favoured against a ten-knockout striker

The Numbers

Composites, division ranks and round-by-round evidence

Striking

SLpM 25% · StrAcc 30% · StrDef 30% · SApM 15%

Matheus

Jai

Two points, from opposite ends. Herbert lands more (3.19 significant strikes per minute against 2.22) and Camilo defends far better — 67% striking defence against 53%, and 3.05 absorbed per minute against 3.34. Accuracy is nearly level at 43% and 42%. Neither man is a high-volume striker; the gap that matters is that one of them can be hit and the other largely cannot.

Grappling

TD/15 25% · TDAcc 25% · TDDef 30% · Sub/15 20%

Matheus

Jai

Camilo's column, and the raw numbers understate it. He attempts 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes against Herbert's 0.42 — nearly ten times the volume — and 0.59 submission attempts against 0.00. Herbert's 67% takedown defence is the offsetting figure and it is respectable; Camilo's own is not published, because nobody has meaningfully tried to take him down.

Technical

(Striking + Grappling) / 2

Matheus

0.0

Jai

Four and a half points, which is a fair reading of skill between a young wrestler and an ageing kickboxer. Everything else on this page is about the thirteen years and the seven and a half inches.

Cardio

Fight time · pace curve · rounds contested

Matheussmall sample

Jai

Camilo's, on age rather than on evidence — his round table rests on two scored bouts and his second round shows only 5.5 significant strikes landed alongside 103 seconds of control, which is a grappling round rather than a fade. Herbert's output actually rises across the fight, from 11.6 to 18.3 with control time reaching 74 seconds, which is a genuinely good late-round profile for a 38-year-old.

Overall

(Technical + Cardio) / 2

0.0

Matheus

0.0

Jai

Five points, mapping onto a ten-point model line. The projection is slightly wider than the gauges because thirteen years and a 25-foot cage are not things a rate line can express.

Metric	Matheus	Jai
Avg Fight TimeAvg Fight TimeAverage fight duration — long averages mark proven cardio and decision-ready grinders.	8:25 (UFC)	10:42 (UFC)
Pace Tier	2.22 SLpM — lowest in this bout	3.19 SLpM
Control Time (R1/R2)	67 / 103 seconds	24 / 47 seconds
Damage Absorbed	3.05 per minute	3.34 per minute
Takedowns / 15	4.16	0.42

Archetype Base Rate

Control Wrestler 55%45% Long-Range Knockout Striker

No archetype base-rate row exists for this pairing · No historical archetype rate is applied. The 55/45 rests on 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes against 0.42, control time of 67 and 103 seconds against 24 and 47, thirteen years of age, and a 25-foot cage that shrinks the only advantage the older man owns. It is capped by seven and a half inches of reach, ten career knockouts, a 0.33 first-round knockdown average, and the fact that Camilo lands only 2.22 significant strikes per minute if the wrestling does not work.

Matheus CamiloJai Herbert

Lightweight

· 52 fighters

Stat	Matheus	Matheus rank	Div avg	Jai rank	Jai
SLpMSLpMSignificant Strikes Landed per Minute — offensive striking volume. Higher = busier striker.	2.22	—	~4.21	—	3.19
Str AccStr AccStriking Accuracy — share of significant strikes thrown that land. Higher = more precise.	43%	—	~45%	—	42%
Str DefStr DefStriking Defense — share of opponents' significant strikes that do NOT land. Higher = harder to hit.	67%	—	~57%	—	53%
SApMSApMSignificant Strikes Absorbed per Minute — how much a fighter gets hit. Lower = better.	3.05	—	~4.02	—	3.34
TD/15TD/15Takedowns Landed per 15 minutes — wrestling pressure / takedown engine.	4.16	—	~1.71	—	0.42
TD DefTD DefTakedown Defense — share of opponents' takedown attempts stuffed.	Not found — never tested	—	~64%	—	67%
Sub/15Sub/15Submission Attempts per 15 minutes — how actively a fighter hunts the finish on the mat.	0.59	—	~0.49	—	0.00
Career Finish Rate	64% (7 of 11)	—	—	—	79% (11 of 14)
Reach	69.5"	—	~72"	—	77"
Age	25	—	—	—	38
Scored UFC Rounds	5	—	—	—	23

Statistical Verdict
Camilo is well below the lightweight baseline on output — 2.22 significant strikes per minute against ~4.21 — and ten points above it on striking defence while attempting more than double the divisional takedown volume. Herbert is below baseline on output, accuracy and takedown volume, and above it on takedown defence. The rows that decide the fight are the takedown row and the reach row, and they point in opposite directions. The row nobody can read is Camilo's takedown defence, which has never been tested.

Significant Strikes Landed per Round

⚠ R3: single-fight sample for Matheus Camilo

Control Time per Round (sec)

Matheus Camilo

103 seconds of control in his one heavily-sampled second round, alongside only 5.5 significant strikes landed — the clearest picture of a grappling round in this analysis series.
Output is genuinely low across the board: 12.0, 5.5 and 17.0 landed, at 44.4%, 44.0% and 41.5% accuracy. He does not out-strike people, he out-positions them.
A pure distance-or-mat fighter with almost no clinch work — 0.0%, 9.1% and 0.0% of his offence lands in the clinch across the three rounds.
His table rests on two scored bouts and his third-round row on one. The 91-second knockout of Nazim Sadykhov postdates the snapshot entirely.

Jai Herbert

A rare fighter whose output rises every round: 11.6, 13.5 and 18.3 landed, with accuracy climbing from 38.2% to 42.1% and control time from 24 to 74 seconds.
The knockdown threat is front-loaded — 0.33 in the first round, 0.13 in the second, zero in the third — even though his volume peaks last.
A committed body attacker in the middle round: 41.7% of his Round-2 offence lands downstairs, the highest single body share on his sheet.
Twenty-three scored rounds across nine Octagon bouts — a solid sample, and by far the deeper of the two on this page.

Critical Insight
Two profiles that barely overlap. Camilo's second round contains 103 seconds of control and 5.5 significant strikes landed — a round in which almost nothing happens except position — while Herbert's numbers climb steadily to 18.3 landed and 74 seconds of control by the third. Herbert's danger is front-loaded (a 0.33 knockdown average in the first, zero by the third) and his scoring is back-loaded, which is an awkward combination against a wrestler whose control peaks in the middle. The fight most likely resolves as a series of arguments about whether 103 seconds of control outweighs eighteen landed strikes.

Strike Targeting (career avg)

Head hunting vs body work vs leg attack — the shape of the damage.

Range Profile — where the minutes go

MatheusJai

93%Distance81%

3%Clinch15%

4%Ground4%

Share of significant-strike volume by range from UFC career data. Debutants / fighters without Octagon samples show as N/A.

The Story of the Fight

Advantages, worst cases, gameplans — and the patterns underneath

Where the fight lives

Who owns each phase — and by how much

Open SpaceJai owns it

Seven and a half inches of reach and 75-88% distance work against 2.22 significant strikes landed per minute

Pocket / ExchangesJai owns it

Ten career knockouts and a 0.33 first-round knockdown average — but Camilo defends 67% and knocked out Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds

ClinchMatheus owns it

4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes and 103 seconds of second-round control, in the promotion's smallest cage

GroundMatheus owns it

0.59 submission attempts per fifteen against 0.00, and Herbert has no offensive wrestling to reverse position

Path to Victory

Matheus Camilo

Close seven and a half inches and take him down. In a 25-foot cage there is less of it to close than usual.

Why they win

Ten times the takedown volume

4.16 attempts per fifteen minutes against 0.42, with 67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds.

Thirteen years younger

25 against 38 — the widest age gap at either October event.

Fourteen points of striking defence

67% against 53%, with 3.05 significant strikes absorbed per minute against 3.34.

The 25-foot Apex cage

It removes the space a seven-and-a-half-inch reach advantage depends on.

A 91-second knockout of Nazim Sadykhov

The best win on either sheet, four months before this fight.

0.59 submission attempts per fifteen against zero

Herbert has no offensive grappling and no route off his back.

The gameplan

1
Change levels immediately
4.16 takedowns per fifteen against 0.42, in the smallest cage the promotion uses. Every exchange at range is one he is losing.
2
Use the fence, not the open mat
His control time peaks at 103 seconds and his clinch striking is almost nil — the cage does the work.
3
Do not stand in front of him
Ten career knockouts and a 0.33 first-round knockdown average. Camilo has 67% striking defence and no reason to test it.
4
Attack the legs on the way in
The cheapest way to close seven and a half inches against a fighter whose distance share reaches 88%.
5
Bank the second round
It is where his control peaks and where Herbert is least dangerous — a 0.13 knockdown average and rising volume he has not yet reached.
6
Contingency — if Plan A fails
If two takedown attempts are stuffed early, he cannot win a striking match at 2.22 a minute — the answer is volume of entries, not a change of plan.

Path to Victory

Jai Herbert

Keep it at 77 inches. His opponent lands 2.22 significant strikes a minute — at range, that is nothing.

Why they win

Seven and a half inches of reach

The largest frame gap at UFC Vegas 122, against a man who lands 2.22 significant strikes per minute.

Ten career knockouts

Including a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo in April 2026, and a 0.33 first-round knockdown average.

Twenty-three scored Octagon rounds

Against five, across nine UFC bouts to two.

67% takedown defence

Above the divisional baseline and the direct counter to the only thing Camilo does well.

A rising output curve

11.6 to 13.5 to 18.3 landed, with control time reaching 74 seconds by the third — unusual for a 38-year-old.

Camilo's takedown defence has never been measured

If Herbert ever does shoot, nobody knows what happens.

The gameplan

1
Fight at 77 inches
It is the largest reach advantage at this event and his opponent lands 2.22 significant strikes a minute without it.
2
Stay off the fence
The Apex is 25 feet and Camilo holds 103 seconds of control in a second round. Circling early is worth more than sprawling late.
3
Look for the finish in the first
His knockdown average is 0.33 there and falls to zero by the third, even though his volume climbs.
4
Attack the body
41.7% of his second-round offence already lands downstairs — the fastest way to slow a wrestler who has to keep closing distance.
5
Use the third round
His output peaks at 18.3 landed with 74 seconds of control. If he is level after ten minutes, the last five are his.
6
Contingency — if Plan A fails
If he is taken down in the first two rounds, getting up matters more than the scramble — Camilo attempts 0.59 submissions per fifteen and Herbert has never defended one in the Octagon.

Danger Zone

How Matheus Camilo loses

He cannot cover seven and a half inches, lands 2.22 significant strikes a minute doing it, and loses three rounds without ever getting a grip.
He walks into the 0.33 first-round knockdown average of a man with ten career knockouts, on the way in.
His entries are stuffed by a 67% sprawl and the fight becomes the striking match he cannot win.

Danger Zone

How Jai Herbert loses

He is taken down twice a round in a 25-foot cage and loses fifteen minutes to control time he has no answer for.
Thirteen years show up in the third round, in the only fight of his recent career where he has had to carry weight rather than throw punches.
He gets caught by the same fighter who removed Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds.

The mechanism

Ten Times the Takedown Volume

Matheus Camilo attempts 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes — the third-highest figure at UFC Vegas 122 — and Jai Herbert attempts 0.42. Camilo holds 67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds against 24 and 47. In a 25-foot cage, against a man who needs seven and a half inches of space to work, that is the whole fight.

4.16 v 0.42

takedowns per 15 minutes

Herbert's case

The Largest Reach Gap at the Event

Seventy-seven inches against 69.5 — a seven-and-a-half-inch gap, the widest at UFC Vegas 122. Herbert lands 75-88% of his offence at distance and has ten career knockouts, most recently a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo in April 2026. If Camilo cannot close that gap, he has no offence at all: 2.22 significant strikes landed per minute is the lowest figure in this bout.

+7.5"

reach advantage to Herbert

Why the wrestler is not harmless

Ninety-One Seconds

In June 2026 Matheus Camilo knocked out Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds. It is by far the best win on his record and it is the reason a fighter averaging 2.22 significant strikes per minute cannot be dismissed as a pure grinder — five of his eleven wins came by knockout.

1:31

Camilo KO of Nazim Sadykhov

The oldest gap on the card

Thirteen Years

Camilo is 25 and Herbert is 38 — the widest age gap at either October event. Herbert has 23 scored Octagon rounds to Camilo's five, which cuts the other way, and his output actually climbs across the fight from 11.6 to 18.3. Age is the argument; it is not yet visible in his numbers.

25 v 38

age

The honest gap

Camilo's Takedown Defence Has Never Been Recorded

UFC.com publishes no takedown-defence figure for Matheus Camilo because no opponent has meaningfully attempted one against him in the Octagon. Jai Herbert attempts 0.42 per fifteen minutes, so it is unlikely to be tested here either — but it is a genuine hole in the profile and the row reads "Not found" rather than being filled in.

The Five-Round Clock

Matheus Camilo danger windowJai Herbert danger windowNeutral / contested

R1 · 0:00–5:00Herbert's window

A 0.33 knockdown average — his highest — with ten career knockouts and a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo five months ago. Camilo answers with 67 seconds of control and 12.0 landed at 44.4%, but his own knockdown average is zero across every scored round.

Critical Insight
A clock with the danger and the scoring in different places for both men. Herbert's knockdown threat is highest in the first round (0.33) and gone by the third; his volume is highest in the third (18.3) and lowest in the first. Camilo's control peaks in the second at 103 seconds, in the round where Herbert is neither at his most dangerous nor at his busiest. That middle five minutes is where the fight is most likely decided, and it is the round the wrestler owns on every measured column.

Finish Threat by Round

Share of each fighter's wins that end in each round — early finishers spike left, grinders rise right.

The Verdict

One hundred simulated fights, the betting market, and our conviction

If you only read 3 things

Matheus Camilo attempts 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes against Jai Herbert's 0.42, with 103 seconds of control in an average second round — in the promotion's smallest cage.

Herbert owns the largest reach advantage at UFC Vegas 122 at seven and a half inches, ten career knockouts, and a 125-second finish of Mandel Nallo five months ago.

Model: Camilo 55% / Herbert 45%, conviction 4/10 — capped because Camilo lands only 2.22 significant strikes per minute if the wrestling does not work.

100 Simulated Fights

Camilo Decision — 36%Herbert KO/TKO — 26%Camilo KO/TKO — 12%Herbert Decision — 17%Camilo Submission — 7%Herbert Submission — 2%

Each square = 1 simulated fight. Matheus Camilo gold · Jai Herbert orange · full color = decision, 70% = submission, 45% = KO/TKO.

The takedown volume gap

4.16 attempts per fifteen minutes against 0.42, with control time of 67 and 103 seconds against 24 and 47.

Seven and a half inches of reach

The largest frame gap at this event, against a fighter landing 2.22 significant strikes per minute.

The 25-foot Apex cage

It shrinks the distance a long-range striker needs and shortens the path to the fence.

Thirteen years

25 against 38 — though Herbert's output still rises every round, so it is an argument rather than a measurement.

The Sadykhov knockout

A 91-second finish of a dangerous lightweight in June 2026, and it is not in the round-by-round data at all.

Camilo's unmeasured takedown defence

Nobody has tried, and Herbert probably will not — but the row is genuinely blank.

Fight Scripts

of simulations

The Grind

Camilo closes seven and a half inches in a 25-foot cage, lands 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes, and holds 103 seconds of a second round. Herbert has 0.42 takedowns per fifteen of his own and no way to reverse it. A 29-28 built on minutes rather than damage.

Scripted outcomes for Matheus Camilo vs Jai Herbert — how each version of this fight unfolds.

Matheus Camilo win probability

12%

36%

KO/TKODECSUB

Five career knockouts and a 91-second finish of Nazim Sadykhov in June 2026, against a 38-year-old who has been dropped three times in the Octagon. Small but genuinely live.
The largest bucket on the page. 4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes, 103 seconds of second-round control, and a 25-foot cage against a man with 0.42 takedowns of his own.
Two career submissions and 0.59 attempts per fifteen minutes against 0.00 — Herbert has no offensive grappling and no route off his back.

Jai Herbert win probability

26%

17%

KO/TKODECSUB

The largest finishing bucket in the bout. Ten career knockouts, a 0.33 first-round knockdown average, seven and a half inches of reach, and a 125-second knockout of Mandel Nallo in April 2026.
His output peaks at 18.3 landed in the third round with 74 seconds of control — a genuinely good late-round profile. It requires him to stay upright for fifteen minutes.
One career submission and 0.00 attempts per fifteen minutes. Effectively absent.

Projected Scorecards

How the model scores each round

Jai

Matheus

29-28 Camilo

Herbert takes the first at range; Camilo takes the last two on control time

The most likely card, and the shape of his Borshchev decision

29-28 Herbert

The reach holds and the third round goes to the busier man

Live — Herbert's output peaks at 18.3 in the third

30-27 Camilo

The takedowns land from the opening bell in a 25-foot cage

Requires Herbert's 67% sprawl to fail early

Moneyline

Matheus Camilo

Not posted

Jai Herbert

Not posted

No book has published a line for this bout at the time of writing. Converting our own probabilities gives fair prices of Matheus Camilo -122 from 55% and Jai Herbert +122 from 45% — model outputs, not quotes. Live prices appear in the hero above once a market opens.

Props: model vs market

Prop	Odds	Implied %	Model %	Fair	Edge	Verdict

Best Value
Camilo by decision at 36% is the structural read and the largest bucket on the page — ten times the takedown volume, 103 seconds of second-round control, and a cage that shrinks the only thing Herbert has. The genuine flier is Camilo inside the distance at 19% combined: he removed Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds four months ago and Herbert is 38 with three knockdowns absorbed in the Octagon. If the market prices the reach and the knockout record, Camilo is the value side.

Conviction

4/10

A narrow lean on a clean mechanism with a thin sample behind it. Camilo attempts ten times as many takedowns, holds 103 seconds of control in an average second round, is thirteen years younger, and fights in a cage five feet smaller than usual — all of which press on the one thing Jai Herbert needs, which is space. The cap is that Camilo's entire round-by-round profile is five rounds deep, he lands only 2.22 significant strikes per minute when the wrestling does not land, and Herbert has seven and a half inches of reach with ten career knockouts and a 0.33 first-round knockdown average. Lean: Matheus Camilo.

What backs the lean

4.16 takedowns per fifteen minutes against 0.42, and 103 seconds of second-round control against 47.
Thirteen years younger — the widest age gap at either October event.
67% striking defence against 53%, with less damage absorbed.
A 25-foot cage that removes the space a seven-and-a-half-inch reach edge requires.
A 91-second knockout of Nazim Sadykhov in June 2026 — the best win on either sheet.
0.59 submission attempts per fifteen against zero, with no reversal threat from Herbert.

What limits it

Seven and a half inches of reach and three of height, the largest frame gap at this event.
Ten career knockouts and a 0.33 first-round knockdown average.
Camilo lands only 2.22 significant strikes per minute — the lowest figure in this bout by a wide margin.
Herbert defends 67% of takedowns, above the lightweight baseline.
Twenty-three scored Octagon rounds against five, and nine UFC bouts against two.
Herbert's output rises every round to 18.3 landed, with control time reaching 74 seconds.

Final Assessment

In roughly fifty-five of one hundred simulations Matheus Camilo wins, and in thirty-six of those he wins on the scorecards. The mechanism is ten times the takedown volume — 4.16 attempts per fifteen minutes against 0.42 — with 67 and 103 seconds of control in the first two rounds, executed in a 25-foot Apex cage that gives a seven-and-a-half-inch reach advantage nowhere to live. Twelve more end by strike, because the man who knocked out Nazim Sadykhov in 91 seconds in June is not a pure grinder.

In the other forty-five, the length does what length does. Jai Herbert lands 75-88% of his offence at distance, owns ten career knockouts and a 0.33 opening-round knockdown average, and finished Mandel Nallo in 125 seconds five months ago. Twenty-six of those simulations are Herbert knockouts and seventeen are decisions built on an output curve that climbs to 18.3 landed in a third round with 74 seconds of control.

This is a venue fight as much as a styles fight. In a 30-foot Octagon the seven and a half inches and the 4.16 takedowns are close to an even trade; in the smallest cage the promotion owns, they are not. On October 10 at the Apex — Camilo 55% / Herbert 45%, conviction 4/10.

Back to UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan Fight Card