Louis Jourdain vs Timmy Cuamba: analysis & prediction

MAIN CARD · BANTAMWEIGHT · 3 ROUNDSUFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott
Louis Jourdain — Bantamweight fighter

Louis Jourdain

“The Mad Prince”
9W3L
Volume Striker
VS
Timmy Cuamba — Bantamweight fighter

Timmy Cuamba

“Twilight”
10W4L
Wrestling-First

A Contender Series volume striker against a slow-starting UFC wrestler

BantamweightRogers Place, Edmonton, AlbertaOctober 17, 2026Standard 30ft Octagon

Fight overview

The fight in 30 seconds

Jourdain, making his Octagon debut, throws from the opening bell and does most of his finishing after the damage has piled up. Cuamba starts slowly and wrestles his way into fights from the second round on, so he has to shoot early and ride fence control without scrambles. Benardo Sopaj took his back and submitted him in May, and Jourdain won his Contender Series bout with a rear-naked choke.

Paths that change the fight

  • Louis JourdainMake the first round count. Cuamba lands 10.2 significant strikes in a whole opening round at 32% accuracy, a Canadian crowd will carry the pace — and if the shot comes off a failed takedown, the back is there.
  • Timmy CuambaShoot before minute five, and hold. He wins on control minutes without ever needing a finish, but his Octagon first rounds say he starts late, and starting late against this profile is how the fight is lost before his best rounds arrive.
What limits this estimate · Analyst conviction: 5/10
  • Jourdain's figures were built in a single 10:39 Contender Series bout — some regression against UFC opposition is the base case, not a risk.
  • Cuamba owns the only functioning takedown offence in the fight (1.47 per fifteen minutes) against an opponent who attempted none on the Contender Series.

Editorial assessment of the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

Louis Jourdain

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
56%
Fair odds
-127
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
1.79

Timmy Cuamba

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
44%
Fair odds
+127
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
2.27
Price freshness & calculation notes

Quotes older than 48 hours are marked outdated. EV at an old or undated price is a historical calculation, not a current opportunity. Date-only snapshots have no verified capture time.

Sources and data limitations

Career statistics and fight results through September 2026. Composite scores, probabilities and fair prices are MMA Analytics model outputs.

Model methodology
Read the evidenceInspect prices and assumptions
01

The Frame

What this fight is really about — and the measurements that shape it

The Analyst's Take

A 9-3 Quebecer making his Octagon debut, against a 10-4 veteran of five UFC fights who is coming off a rear-naked choke. Louis Jourdain's calling card is one Contender Series night against Magno Dias: 78 significant strikes landed in 10 minutes 39 seconds — 7.32 a minute, against 2.44 absorbed — one knockdown, and a rear-naked choke 39 seconds into the third round. Timmy Cuamba's Octagon rounds say something quieter and more specific. He lands 10.2 significant strikes in an average first round at 32% accuracy, with eleven seconds of control, while opponents land 17.0 on him. Then he wakes up: 17.4 strikes at 58% in the second, 113 seconds of control by the third. The model has Jourdain 56% because the first five minutes in Edmonton belong to the man who throws, and because Cuamba's most recent night ended with somebody on his back.

Louis Jourdain
Attribute
Timmy Cuamba
29
Age
27
5'9"
Height
5'9"
69"
Reach
+2" Cuamba71"
41.5"+1.5" Jourdain
Leg Reach
40"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Brazilian Top Team Canada
Team
—
This bout — Contender Series win, Sep 30, 2025
Octagon Debut
Feb 10, 2024 (Oki, L)
High-volume striking, opportunistic chokes
Fighting Style
Wrestling-first pressure, KO or decision

Identical height at 5'9", and Cuamba holds two inches of arm reach — 71" against 69" — while Jourdain's legs are an inch and a half longer. Two years of age favour the visitor as well, 27 against 29, though both sit in the middle of a bantamweight prime. The real gap is not in inches: it is output density. Jourdain's Contender Series win produced 7.32 significant strikes landed per minute against 2.44 absorbed; Cuamba's Octagon career produces 2.89 landed against 3.54 absorbed. One man landed three for every one he took; the other takes more than he lands. Cuamba's reach only matters if he can hold a range long enough to use it, and his Octagon first rounds show him spending the opening five minutes at distance — 96% of his first-round offence — landing 10.2 strikes at 32% accuracy.

Venue Factor
Three rounds in Rogers Place, and the round count is the whole argument. Cuamba's own numbers make him a second- and third-round fighter — 11 seconds of control in an average opening round, 47 in the second, 113 in the third — which means a fifteen-minute fight gives him two rounds of his best work and one round of his worst. That worst round is the one a Canadian crowd will be loudest for, and it is the one where Jourdain's Contender Series pace meets a man who lands 32% of his first-round strikes. There is no championship distance here to reward the deeper wrestling tank; the fight can be decided before the wrestling normally arrives.
02

The Fighters

Careers, chins, schedules — and the form they bring into the cage

Louis Jourdain throws a jab on Dana White's Contender Series

Louis Jourdain

Pro Record
9-3-0
UFC Record
No Octagon bouts — Contender Series 1-0
Streak
Four straight wins — three TKOs and a third-round rear-naked choke
Finish Rate
~67% (6 finishes in 9 wins) — 4 KO/TKO, 2 submissions, 3 decisions
Avg Fight Time
10:39 (Contender Series)
Chin · Untested at UFC level — zero knockout losses in twelve pro fightsSOS · Regional + Contender SeriesVolume striker who submits when the back appears

A four-fight winning run that ends on the biggest stage he has reached. Jourdain started 5-2 on the Quebec circuit between 2016 and 2018 — two finishes, three decisions and two rear-naked-choke losses — then dropped a unanimous decision to Avliyohon Hamidov at UAE Warriors 15 in January 2021. He has not lost since: Gabe Sagman stopped on the corner's call after the second round at Unified 48 in December 2022, Diego Silva stopped on the doctor's advice after the first at Samourai MMA 6 in May 2023, and Danilo Adreani stopped at 4:51 of the second at Samourai MMA 14 in May 2025. Then the Contender Series, 30 September 2025, and a rear-naked choke on Magno Dias 39 seconds into the third round. That night produced numbers a bantamweight prospect rarely posts: 78 significant strikes in 10:39, 86% of them landed standing and 37% of them to the legs, 7.32 a minute against a divisional average of 4.45, and 2.44 absorbed against an average of 4.19. The decision loss to Hamidov is the entry that matters most here, because it is the shape Cuamba's five decision wins take.

Timmy Cuamba fighting in the Octagon

Timmy Cuamba

Pro Record
10-4-0
UFC Record
2-3 across five bouts since February 2024
Streak
Lost his last — Benardo Sopaj, rear-naked choke, R2 2:25 (May 2026)
Finish Rate
50% (5 KO/TKO of 10 wins) — zero career submissions
Avg Fight Time
12:16 in the Octagon
Chin · Never knocked out — both inside-distance losses came by submission; two knockdowns absorbed in the UFC (Almeida, Sopaj)SOS · UFC mid-tierWrestling-first pressure fighter

Five Octagon fights and a steady descent through the divisions. Cuamba came to the UFC off a Contender Series decision over Mateo Vogel in 2023 and took his debut against Bolaji Oki at lightweight in February 2024, eight days after a second-round stoppage at Tuff-N-Uff — a split-decision loss. Then featherweight against Lucas Almeida in June 2024, a unanimous-decision loss in which he absorbed a knockdown; featherweight again for the flying-knee knockout of Roberto Romero at 3:55 of the second in April 2025; then bantamweight for a unanimous decision over Chang Ho Lee in November 2025. Two weight classes shed in four fights, and both wins arrived once he stopped giving away size. What the record does not soften is May 2026: Benardo Sopaj dropped him in the second round and finished him with a rear-naked choke at 2:25 — his second knockdown absorbed in the UFC and the second submission loss of his career. That is why a fighter with no submission wins of his own is walking into a man who finished his Contender Series fight from the back. His identity is otherwise clear and durable — five knockouts, five decisions, and control time that climbs from 11 seconds to 113 across a fight.

Louis Jourdain
0 dealt · 0 absorbed
Knockdown Exchange
Knockdowns dealt vs absorbed.
Timmy Cuamba
0 dealt · 0 absorbed

Louis Jourdainsignature weapons

Rear-Naked ChokeMagno Dias at 0:39 of the third on the Contender Series and William Caron in the second in 2016 — one submission attempt in his Contender Series fight, and it finished it
×2
Compounding VolumeFour TKO wins, three of them at 4:51 or later in their round; 78 significant strikes in 10:39 on the Contender Series, 86% of them landed standing
×4

Timmy Cuambasignature weapons

Flying KneeRoberto Romero, R2 3:55, April 2025 — his only Octagon finish and his only Octagon knockdown
×1
Late Control WrestlingControl time climbs 11s → 47s → 113s across rounds one to three; the Chang Ho Lee unanimous decision is the template
×1

Louis Jourdain

W
Magno Dias
Submission — Rear-Naked Choke

Opponent context: prospect

R3 (0:39)
Contender Series — Sep 30, 2025
W
Danilo Adreani
KO/TKO

Opponent context: prospect

R2 (4:51)
Samourai MMA 14 — May 9, 2025
W
Diego Silva
TKO — Doctor Stoppage

Opponent context: prospect

R1 (5:00)
Samourai MMA 6 — May 26, 2023
W
Gabe Sagman
TKO — Corner Stoppage

Opponent context: prospect

R2 (5:00)
Unified MMA 48 — Dec 16, 2022
L
Avliyohon Hamidov
Decision — Unanimous

Opponent context: prospect

R3
UAE Warriors 15 — Jan 15, 2021
Pattern

Four wins, four different ways of getting late. Silva was stopped after the first round, Sagman after the second, Adreani at 4:51 of the second and Dias 39 seconds into the third — accumulation rather than one-punch endings. The Contender Series choke is the most useful entry on the list: it says that when a bantamweight is tired and turning away in a third round, Jourdain knows what to do with the back. The counter-evidence is the oldest line here — Avliyohon Hamidov out-pointed him over three rounds in January 2021, which is the exact result Cuamba's résumé is built out of.

Timmy Cuamba

L
Benardo Sopaj
Submission — Rear-Naked Choke

Opponent context: prospect

R2 (2:25)
UFC FN: Allen vs. Costa — May 16, 2026
W
Chang Ho Lee
Decision — Unanimous

Opponent context: prospect

R3
UFC FN: Garcia vs. Onama — Nov 1, 2025
W
Roberto Romero
KO/TKO — Flying knee

Opponent context: prospect

R2 (3:55)
UFC FN: Machado Garry vs. Prates — Apr 26, 2025
L
Lucas Almeida
Decision — Unanimous

Opponent context: veteran

R3
UFC FN: Perez vs. Taira — Jun 15, 2024
L
Bolaji Oki
Decision — Split

Opponent context: prospect

R3
UFC FN: Hermansson vs. Pyfer — Feb 10, 2024
Pattern

Two wins and three losses, and the split is almost perfectly clean. He wins when he wrestles and banks minutes (Chang Ho Lee, unanimous) or when chaos off an entry produces power (Roberto Romero, flying knee at 3:55 of the second). He loses when the fight is a striking contest he cannot slow down (Almeida, Oki — both decisions; Almeida also scored a knockdown) or when a scramble turns into somebody taking his back after a knockdown (Sopaj, rear-naked choke at 2:25 of the second). Three of his five appearances went the full fifteen minutes, so the deep water is genuinely his; the problem is the shallow end, where his first rounds average 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy while opponents land 17.0 on him.

Louis Jourdain

Win Methods
Wins by Round

Timmy Cuamba

Win Methods
Wins by Round
Critical Insight
The donuts state the matchup in one line: Jourdain finishes two ways, Cuamba finishes one. Jourdain's nine wins split into four knockouts, two submissions and three decisions; Cuamba's ten split evenly between five knockouts and five decisions. Both men do their finishing in the same place — four second-round stoppages apiece — and Cuamba has zero submission wins in fourteen professional fights against two submission losses, the most recent of them five months before this bout.

Opposition strength (no shared opponents)

Without a reliable shared-opponent table, compare who each fighter has been tested against using SOS tier, UFC sample size, and recent elite-tier form — not raw records alone.

FactorLouisTimmy
Strength of schedule (SOS tier)Regional + Contender Series — Beat Magno Dias on the Contender Series and Adreani, Silva and Sagman on Samourai and Unified cards; lost a decision to Avliyohon Hamidov in 2021 and was submitted twice in 2017UFC mid-tier — Beat Chang Ho Lee and Roberto Romero; lost to Benardo Sopaj, Lucas Almeida and Bolaji Oki
UFC sampleNo Octagon bouts — Contender Series 1-02-3 across five bouts since February 2024
Recent ranked / elite touches (last 5)0 elite · 0 veteran tier0 elite · 1 veteran tier
Form-window difficulty edge: Fighter B (6 vs 5 tier points in listed bouts).
Last three opponentsMagno Dias, Danilo Adreani, Diego SilvaBenardo Sopaj, Chang Ho Lee, Roberto Romero
  • Benardo Sopaj (style proxy): A submission hunter dropped Cuamba, took his back and finished him in the second. Jourdain's Contender Series win came by rear-naked choke, and both of his career submissions are rear-naked chokes
  • Avliyohon Hamidov (style proxy): A durable card-banker out-pointed Jourdain across three rounds — the only template on his record for the fight Cuamba's five decision wins describe
03

The Numbers

Composites, division context and round-by-round evidence

Composite scores summarize selected statistics on a 0–100 scale. They are not win probabilities. Compare the underlying metrics, opponent quality and UFC experience before interpreting a score difference as a matchup advantage.

Striking

SLpM 25% · StrAcc 30% · StrDef 30% · SApM 15%

0
Louisfew UFC fights
0
Timmy

A 24-point gap and the largest single number in the matchup. Jourdain's mark is a model estimate built on his Contender Series night — 7.32 landed per minute at 49% accuracy, 2.44 absorbed, 54% defence. Cuamba's UFC line: 2.89, 46%, 3.54 absorbed, 56% defence. Cuamba wins the defence column by two points against a two-and-a-half-times volume deficit.

Grappling

TD/15 25% · TDAcc 25% · TDDef 30% · Sub/15 20%

0
Louisfew UFC fights
0
Timmy

The strangest gauge in the set. Cuamba owns every offensive wrestling column — 1.47 takedowns per fifteen minutes at 32%, against no attempts from Jourdain on the Contender Series — and still grades lower, because he has no finishing threat once he arrives (no submission attempts in the UFC, zero career submission wins) while Jourdain has two career submissions. Takedown defence is level at 67%.

Technical

(Striking + Grappling) / 2

0
Louisfew UFC fights
0
Timmy

Fifteen technical points, almost all of it imported from the striking column. On technique this is not a close fight; on Octagon experience it very much is, which is why the model prices it at 56-44 rather than the 70-30 the composites alone would suggest.

MetricLouisTimmy
Avg Fight Time10:39 (Contender Series)few UFC fights12:16 (Octagon)
Pace TierElite volume — 7.32 SLpM on the Contender Seriesfew UFC fightsLow volume — 2.89 SLpM (division 4.45)
R3/R1 Output—few UFC fights127% (13.0 vs 10.2 sig)
Slow Start %—few UFC fightsSevere — 10.2 sig at 32% accuracy, 11s control
Champ Rounds3-round bout3-round bout

Archetype Base Rate

Volume Striker 56%44% Wrestling-First Pressure

— · The 56-44 line weighs Cuamba's five Octagon fights against a two-and-a-half-times volume gap on Jourdain's Contender Series night, a rear-naked-choke finisher against a fighter with no submission wins and a fresh choke loss, and a Canadian crowd in Edmonton.

Bantamweight

· 52 fighters

Rank bars use the recorded division cohort. Where a rank is unavailable, the comparison shows the difference from the published division average; the white marker denotes equality. Percentage differences are percentage points (pp). Higher is not always better: fewer strikes absorbed is preferable. Missing benchmarks are not estimated.

StatLouisLouis comparisonDiv avgTimmy comparisonTimmy
SLpM7.32
+2.87 vs avgfew UFC fights
4.45
-1.56 vs avg
2.89
Str Acc49%
+2.80 pp vs avgfew UFC fights
46.2%
-0.20 pp vs avg
46%
Str Def54%
+0.30 pp vs avgfew UFC fights
53.7%
+2.30 pp vs avg
56%
SApM2.44
-1.75 vs avgfew UFC fights
4.19
-0.65 vs avg
3.54
KD Avg1.41
+0.99 vs avgfew UFC fights
0.42
-0.18 vs avg
0.24
Damage Ratio3.00
+1.80 vs avgfew UFC fights
1.20
-0.38 vs avg
0.82
TD/150.00
-1.49 vs avgfew UFC fights
1.49
-0.02 vs avg
1.47
TD Acc—
Not availablefew UFC fights
—
Not available
32%
TD Def67%
Not availablefew UFC fights
~67%
Not available
67%
Sub/151.41
+0.90 vs avgfew UFC fights
0.51
-0.51 vs avg
0.00
Avg Fight Time10:39 (one bout)
Not available
—
Not available
12:16 (five bouts)
Statistical Verdict
Read purely as numbers, Jourdain's column is a contender's: output about 65% above the divisional average, absorption well below it, a 3.00 damage ratio against 1.20, and nearly three times the divisional submission rate. Read as evidence, it is one fight against Magno Dias on a Tuesday night in Las Vegas. Cuamba's column is genuinely below average where it counts for a striker — 2.89 landed, a 0.82 damage ratio — and he owns the only functioning takedown offence in the fight at 1.47 per fifteen minutes. Takedown defence is level at 67%. The row that decides the matchup is the submission line: a finisher from the back against a man who was choked out in May.

Significant Strikes Landed per Round

Control Time per Round (sec)

Louis Jourdain

  • Jourdain makes his Octagon debut here, so his round-by-round story starts in Edmonton.
  • His Contender Series win shows a clear positional split: 67 of his 78 significant strikes landed standing (86%), 4 in the clinch and 7 on the ground — and 37% of them went to the legs. He is a range fighter who visited the mat once, and finished the fight when he got there.
  • His finish times tell the rest: a rear-naked choke at 0:39 of the third, a TKO at 4:51 of the second, and two stoppages called between rounds, after the first and after the second. Five of his six career finishes came in the second round or later.

Timmy Cuamba

  • The slow start is his Octagon first-round average: 10.2 significant strikes landed at 32% accuracy, eleven seconds of control and no ground strikes, while opponents land 17.0 on him. He gives away the opening five minutes more often than not.
  • Then the fight changes shape. Round two is his best round by a distance — 17.4 significant strikes at 58% accuracy, 47 seconds of control, and the only knockdown of his Octagon career (the flying knee on Roberto Romero).
  • Control time climbs 11 → 47 → 113 seconds and his targeting drops with it: 38.5% of his third-round strikes go to the body and 28.2% land on the ground, against none on the ground in the first. The wrestling is real; it just arrives at the ten-minute mark.
Critical Insight
This is the fight's actual mechanism, and it is visible in one row. Cuamba's average first round is 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control and nothing on the ground — he is not wrestling early, he is waiting, and opponents out-land him 17.0 to 10.2 while he does. His own gameplan needs him to shoot in the first five minutes; his Octagon first rounds contain no takedowns from four attempts. Jourdain has yet to fight a UFC round, which cuts the other way: his pace was built on one Contender Series night, and Cuamba's second and third rounds are exactly where a pace like that gets tested.

Strike targeting

Timmy

Head
62%
Body
24%
Legs
14%

Head hunting vs body work vs leg attack — the shape of the damage.

Striking range — distance, clinch and ground

LouisTimmy
—Distance83%
—Clinch9%
—Ground8%

Share of significant strikes landed at distance, in the clinch and on the ground across each fighter's UFC rounds, weighted by strike volume.

04

The Story of the Fight

Advantages, worst cases, gameplans — and the patterns underneath

Where the fight lives

Who owns each phase — and by how much
Open SpaceLouis owns it

7.32 significant strikes a minute at 49% on the Contender Series, 86% of it landed standing, against Cuamba's UFC 2.89 at 46%

Pocket / ExchangesLouis owns it

2.44 absorbed per minute on the Contender Series against Cuamba's 3.54 — a 3.00 damage ratio against 0.82 in a division averaging 1.20

ClinchTimmy owns it

13.8% of Cuamba's second-round offence is clinch work; Jourdain landed 4 of 78 strikes there on the Contender Series

GroundEven

Cuamba's control climbs to 113 seconds by the third with no submission offence; Jourdain answers with two career submissions, both rear-naked chokes

Path to Victory

Louis Jourdain

Make the first round count. Cuamba lands 10.2 significant strikes in a whole opening round at 32% accuracy, a Canadian crowd will carry the pace — and if the shot comes off a failed takedown, the back is there.

Why they win
01
A two-and-a-half-times volume gap

7.32 significant strikes landed per minute on the Contender Series against Cuamba's UFC 2.89, at 49% accuracy against 46%. The bantamweight average is 4.45 — one of these men was well above it and the other sits well below.

02
The absorption ledger is inverted

2.44 absorbed per minute against 3.54. Jourdain landed three strikes for every one he took against Dias; Cuamba takes more than he lands in the UFC — a 0.82 damage ratio in a division that averages 1.20.

03
A choke finisher against a fighter with no submission wins

Two career submission wins, including a rear-naked choke at 0:39 of the third round in his Contender Series fight — against a man with no submission wins in fourteen fights and a choke loss in May.

04
Rogers Place

A Quebec fighter on Canadian soil in a card built around a hometown main event. Home-cage adrenaline pays out on early pace and on close rounds, and this fight has at least one of each.

05
He finishes after the first round

Five of his six career finishes came in the second round or later, three of the last four at 4:51 or later in their round. He does not need round-one chaos; he needs the fight to keep going.

06
Cuamba's first round is empty

10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control and no ground offence in his average Octagon first round, while opponents land 17.0. That is a free round for anybody who throws.

The gameplan
  1. 1
    Spend the first round

    It is the cheapest round on the card. Cuamba averages 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy in an opening round; there is no reason not to bank it decisively and let the building do the rest.

  2. 2
    Sprawl and punch on every entry

    Cuamba lands 32% of his takedowns. Make the shot expensive with knees and underhooks, and let the failed entries pile up rather than the successful ones.

  3. 3
    Take the back the moment it turns

    This is the matchup edge: a rear-naked-choke finisher against a fighter with no submission wins and a rear-naked-choke loss five months ago. The Sopaj tape is the instruction manual.

  4. 4
    Never accept passive bottom position

    Cuamba's control time climbs tenfold from round one to round three. Losing a round is survivable; giving away 113 seconds of it while doing nothing is how a favourite loses a decision.

  5. 5
    Push the pace into the third

    His last two finishes came at 4:51 of a second round and 0:39 of a third. The volume that scores rounds is the same volume that produces the stoppage — there is no reason to change gears.

Path to Victory

Timmy Cuamba

Shoot before minute five, and hold. He wins on control minutes without ever needing a finish, but his Octagon first rounds say he starts late, and starting late against this profile is how the fight is lost before his best rounds arrive.

Why they win
01
The only functioning wrestling in the fight

1.47 takedowns per fifteen minutes at 32% accuracy against an opponent who attempted none in his Contender Series fight and gave up one of three.

02
Five Octagon fights against Jourdain's none

Three of them went the full fifteen minutes. He knows UFC pace, UFC judging and what a third round feels like in this promotion; his opponent's only relevant night was a Contender Series audition.

03
Two inches of reach

71 inches against 69. If he keeps range and refuses the pocket, the volume gap narrows to something he can survive.

04
He wins rounds two and three

17.4 significant strikes at 58% accuracy in an average second round with 47 seconds of control, then 113 seconds of control in a third. Two thirds of this fight is his best territory.

05
Five decision wins and no need for a finish

Half his career wins are on the cards. He does not have to solve Jourdain's volume, only out-control it for two rounds — and the model's decision bucket agrees, at 28 against 16.

06
The Romero path is live

A flying knee at 3:55 of the second is the one knockdown of his Octagon career, and it came off exactly the kind of chaos a level change creates. Five career knockouts say the power is real.

The gameplan
  1. 1
    Shoot in the first minute, not the tenth

    His Octagon first rounds say he waits. Eleven seconds of control and no ground strikes in an average opening round is the single most fixable number in his profile, and the fight probably turns on whether he fixes it.

  2. 2
    Do not kickbox in Edmonton

    2.89 significant strikes a minute at 46% accuracy, against a man who landed 7.32 at 49% on the Contender Series. Extended pocket exchanges are a losing trade in every round, and the crowd scores the close ones.

  3. 3
    Win ugly — fence rides, not scrambles

    Control without chaos is the entire underdog path. The moment a takedown becomes a scramble, he is fighting a man who finished his Contender Series fight from the back.

  4. 4
    Use the two inches

    71" against 69", and a jab-and-level-change rhythm is the only way to make length pay. Standing still at range does not use reach, it just gives a volume striker a target.

  5. 5
    Bank rounds two and three

    17.4 strikes at 58% and 47 seconds of control in an average second, 113 seconds in a third. If he survives the opening five minutes even, the last ten are statistically his — and the model's largest single bucket is his decision at 28.

Danger Zone

How Louis Jourdain loses

  • The first takedown lands and never stops landing. He threw no takedowns of his own on the Contender Series and gave up one of three, with no proven answer to ten minutes on his back — the fight is lost on control minutes without a single dangerous moment.

  • He chases the home-crowd finish, overextends on an entry, and eats the Romero counter — a flying knee at 3:55 of the second is on Cuamba's record for a reason.

  • The Contender Series numbers turn out to be Contender Series numbers. 7.32 a minute against a regional opponent becomes something far closer to average against a UFC bantamweight, and the statistical case thins out in the first exchange.

Danger Zone

How Timmy Cuamba loses

  • He starts the way he usually starts — 10.2 strikes at 32% accuracy, eleven seconds of control — and loses the opening round in Edmonton to a man who threw seven a minute on the Contender Series.

  • He shoots, the scramble opens, and it is May 2026 again: the back is taken and the rear-naked choke ends it in the second.

  • The takedowns land but do not hold, he cannot finish from top (zero career submissions), and he loses a 'wrestled but out-struck' decision to somebody landing three strikes for every one he takes.

The fight's central axis

The Volume Tax

Louis Jourdain landed 7.32 significant strikes per minute on the Contender Series against a bantamweight average of 4.45; Timmy Cuamba lands 2.89 in the UFC. Over fifteen minutes that is roughly 110 strikes against 43, and the absorption ledger runs the same way — 2.44 taken against 3.54. Every upright minute is a minute Cuamba pays for.

3.00
Jourdain's Contender Series damage ratio vs Cuamba's 0.82 (division 1.20)
The number that decides round one

Eleven Seconds

Across his Octagon first rounds, Cuamba averages eleven seconds of control, 10.2 significant strikes landed, 32% accuracy and no ground offence, while opponents land 17.0 on him. His gameplan requires early takedowns; his first rounds contain none from four attempts. In Edmonton, against a man who threw seven a minute on the Contender Series, that is a round given away before the wrestling starts.

10.2
Cuamba's average first-round significant strikes, at 32% accuracy
Where the matchup edge lives

The Sopaj Echo

Cuamba's most recent fight ended with Benardo Sopaj on his back: a knockdown, then a rear-naked choke at 2:25 of the second. Jourdain's Contender Series win ended with a rear-naked choke at 0:39 of the third. Cuamba has no submission wins in fourteen professional fights and two submission losses; Jourdain has two submission wins, both by rear-naked choke.

0
Cuamba career submission wins, against two submission losses
Why the model stays measured

The Debut Question

Jourdain has never fought in the Octagon. The 7.32, the 2.44 and the 3.00 damage ratio were all built in 10 minutes 39 seconds against Magno Dias on the Contender Series, while Cuamba brings five UFC fights. That experience gap is why a matchup the technical composites separate by fifteen points is priced only six points above even.

Both men peak in the middle

The Inverted Clock

Cuamba's output, accuracy and control all climb across a fight: 10.2 strikes and 11 seconds of control in the first, 17.4 and 47 in the second, 13.0 and 113 in the third. Five of Jourdain's six career finishes came in the second round or later. Both men are built for the middle of the fight — which is why round one, Cuamba's worst, is the swing round.

The Five-Round Clock

Louis Jourdain danger windowTimmy Cuamba danger windowNeutral / contested
R1 · 0:00–5:00The free round

Cuamba's average opening round is 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control and no ground offence, while opponents land 17.0. Jourdain threw 7.32 a minute on the Contender Series and has a Canadian crowd behind him.

Critical Insight
The clock runs backwards for the underdog. Cuamba's strength is rounds two and three, and his weakness is the round that starts with an Edmonton crowd on its feet. If he gives away the first the way he usually does, he needs to win both of the remaining rounds clearly to take a decision — and he has to do it without letting a scramble go long enough for a back-taker to find his neck.

Finish Threat by Round

Share of each fighter's wins that end in each round — early finishers spike left, grinders rise right.

05

The Verdict

One hundred simulated fights, the betting market, and our conviction

If you only read 3 things
1

Louis Jourdain landed 7.32 significant strikes a minute and absorbed 2.44 in his Contender Series win; Timmy Cuamba lands 2.89 and absorbs 3.54 in the UFC. The bantamweight averages are 4.45 and 4.19 — one man was comfortably above the line and the other sits below it.

2

Cuamba's Octagon first rounds average 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control. His path needs early takedowns and his first rounds contain none — while Jourdain finishes from the back, the way Benardo Sopaj beat Cuamba in May.

3

Model: Jourdain 56% / Cuamba 44%, conviction 5/10 — held at five because Jourdain has yet to fight in the Octagon and Cuamba's wrestling decision is still the largest single bucket in the simulation.

Model outcomes per 100 fights

Each square represents one percentage point of the model distribution, not an observed fight. This visualization does not measure model accuracy or reduce uncertainty in the inputs.

Jourdain KO/TKO — 22%Jourdain Submission — 18%Jourdain Decision — 16%Cuamba Decision — 28%Cuamba KO/TKO — 12%Cuamba Submission — 4%

Each square = 1 model percentage point. Louis Jourdain gold · Timmy Cuamba orange · color opacity: 100% = decision, 70% = submission, 45% = KO/TKO.

The output gap

7.32 significant strikes a minute on the Contender Series against Cuamba's UFC 2.89, with 2.44 absorbed against 3.54. In every branch where the fight is contested standing, Jourdain banks the round — which is why his combined finishing buckets reach 40 of 100.

Eleven seconds of first-round control

Cuamba's own record says his wrestling arrives late: 11 seconds of control in an average opening round, 47 in the second, 113 in the third, and no first-round takedowns from four attempts. The model gives Jourdain the first round in most simulations for that reason alone.

The submission matchup

A rear-naked-choke finisher against a fighter with no submission wins and two submission losses, the most recent in May 2026. Jourdain's 18-point submission bucket is larger than his decision bucket.

The debut discount

Jourdain's numbers were built in one Contender Series fight, and he has yet to fight in the Octagon. The model discounts them accordingly; an undiscounted read of the composites would price this closer to 70-30, and that read would be irresponsible.

The wrestling decision

Cuamba's 28-point decision bucket is the single largest outcome in the simulation. Control minutes without scrambles beat volume on three-round cards more often than the striking numbers suggest — it is exactly how he beat Chang Ho Lee.

Fight Scripts

0%
of simulations

The Wrestling Decision

Cuamba shoots early for once, sticks two takedowns a round and rides them out without ever giving up a scramble. Fifteen ugly minutes, no danger, and a card that reads 29-28 for the visitor — the Chang Ho Lee performance, transplanted to Edmonton.

Scripted outcomes for Louis Jourdain vs Timmy Cuamba — how each version of this fight unfolds.

Louis Jourdain win probability
0%
22%
16%
18%
KO/TKODECSUB

  • Four career knockouts, three of them at 4:51 or later in their round. Against a fighter absorbing 3.54 significant strikes a minute in front of an Edmonton crowd, accumulation is a genuine finishing path rather than a bonus.

  • Sixteen points, and the smallest of his three buckets. Out-pointing Cuamba means stopping the takedowns for fifteen minutes — Avliyohon Hamidov proved in 2021 that a card-banker can beat him.

  • Larger than his decision bucket, which is unusual and entirely matchup-driven: a rear-naked-choke finisher against a man with no submission wins who was choked out at 2:25 of the second in May.

Timmy Cuamba win probability
0%
12%
28%
4%
KO/TKODECSUB

  • The Romero path — a flying knee at 3:55 of the second, off the chaos a level change creates. Five career knockouts and an Octagon knockdown say the power is real; 2.89 strikes a minute says he will not find it by volume.

  • His largest bucket and the single largest outcome in the simulation. Five decision wins, three full fifteen-minute Octagon fights, and control time that climbs to 113 seconds by the third — he does not need to solve the striking, only outlast it on the cards.

  • Four points, and generous. He has no submission attempts in the UFC and no submission wins in fourteen professional fights; these are scramble accidents, not a hunted path.

Projected Scorecards

How the model scores each round
R1
Louis
R2
Timmy
R3
Timmy
29-28 Cuamba
The first round to volume, the last two to control minutes
The most likely card, and why the model's decision bucket favours the underdog 28 to 16
29-28 Jourdain
Two striking rounds banked, one wrestling round conceded
The competitive version, and common
30-27 Jourdain
Fifteen minutes of Contender Series pace with no takedown holding
Live if Cuamba starts the way he usually does

Model and price

Louis Jourdain

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
56%
Fair odds
-127
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
1.79
Estimated EV
—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

Timmy Cuamba

Insufficient price data
Model win probability
44%
Fair odds
+127
Reference quote
—
Fair decimal odds
2.27
Estimated EV
—
Edge vs no-vig market
—

EV uses the displayed price: probability × decimal odds − 1. Edge is a percentage-point difference from a proportionally de-vigged, same-book pair. A dash means that comparison is unavailable.

Price freshness & calculation notes

Quotes older than 48 hours are marked outdated. EV at an old or undated price is a historical calculation, not a current opportunity. Date-only snapshots have no verified capture time.

Fair odds are the break-even price under this estimate, not a recommended entry price. Model uncertainty can erase a small edge.

What price would change the calculation? · Louis Jourdain

Change the assumptions to see how the required price moves. This does not update the published model or recommend an entry price.

Required decimal price: 1.79 or higher. At the exact unrounded break-even price, estimated EV is zero.

What price would change the calculation? · Timmy Cuamba

Change the assumptions to see how the required price moves. This does not update the published model or recommend an entry price.

Required decimal price: 2.28 or higher. At the exact unrounded break-even price, estimated EV is zero.

Original analyst price notes

These notes describe the original analysis and may refer to older prices.

Jourdain by submission is the standout if it comes back at plus money. It is worth 18 of his 56 win-shares — more than his decision bucket — and the reasoning is structural rather than stylistic: two career submissions, both rear-naked chokes, one of them the finish of his Contender Series fight, against a fighter with no submission wins and two submission losses, the most recent a rear-naked choke at 2:25 of the second in May 2026. The counter-position is Cuamba by decision at 28 points, the largest single bucket in the simulation, which is the bet if the market overreacts to the Contender Series rate line. Cuamba by submission should be avoided at any price.

Conviction
0
5/10

Editorial confidence in the evidence, not a win probability or a calibrated confidence interval.

A real lean to the higher-output Canadian with the submission matchup and the home building — capped at five out of ten because he has yet to fight in the Octagon, and because Cuamba's wrestling decision remains the largest single outcome in the simulation. Lean: Louis Jourdain.

What backs the lean

  • 7.32 significant strikes landed per minute on the Contender Series against Cuamba's 2.89 in the UFC, and 2.44 absorbed against 3.54.

  • A rear-naked-choke finisher against a fighter with no submission wins and a rear-naked-choke loss in May 2026.

  • Cuamba's Octagon first rounds average 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control.

  • Rogers Place, a Quebec fighter on Canadian soil, and five of six career finishes arriving after the first round.

What limits it

  • Jourdain's figures were built in a single 10:39 Contender Series bout — some regression against UFC opposition is the base case, not a risk.

  • Cuamba owns the only functioning takedown offence in the fight (1.47 per fifteen minutes) against an opponent who attempted none on the Contender Series.

  • Five Octagon fights against none, three of them going the full fifteen minutes, plus two inches of reach.

  • The model's largest single bucket is Cuamba by decision at 28 — control minutes steal three-round fights more often than striking rates suggest.

Final Assessment

The numbers are lopsided and the model is not, and the distance between those two facts is the real story of the fight. On his Contender Series night Louis Jourdain landed two and a half times what Timmy Cuamba lands in the UFC, absorbed a third less, and finished with a choke — and he fights in front of a Canadian crowd. On paper it should be a rout. In practice it is one fight against Magno Dias, 78 significant strikes over 10 minutes 39 seconds, and no Octagon experience at all.

What makes the lean survive that caveat is the shape of Cuamba's own record rather than the size of Jourdain's. Octagon first rounds averaging 10.2 significant strikes at 32% accuracy with eleven seconds of control is not a slow start, it is a habit — and it hands a volume striker the round the Edmonton crowd cares most about. Cuamba's plan requires early takedowns; his first rounds contain none, and by the time his control climbs to 113 seconds in the third the cards may already be gone. Behind that sits the cleanest matchup line on the card: a finisher from the back against a man who has never won by submission and was choked out five months ago.

The honest read: take the Mad Prince narrowly, expect the rounds to be close, and respect the wrestling tax every time Twilight changes levels. If Cuamba shoots inside the first minute and holds, the largest bucket in the simulation is his — an ugly 29-28 that no highlight reel will remember. If he waits the way he always has, the fight is decided in the five minutes he has spent his whole Octagon career giving away.

Back to UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott Fight Card
Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.