Damian Rzepecki vs Magomed Zaynukov
Lightweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Guskov
Saturday, July 25, 2026 • Etihad Arena, Abu Dhabi
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Damian Rzepecki
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Magomed Zaynukov
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Damian Rzepecki
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 | Corneliu Lascar Rotaru | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-06-21 | Patryk Duński | W | KO/TKO (Punch to Body) (R2, —) |
| 2024-11-23 | Marcin Jabłoński | W | KO/TKO (Punch) (R3, —) |
| 2024-03-16 | Giorgi Esiava | W | KO/TKO (Knee) (R3, —) |
| 2023-10-14 | Estabili Amato | W | Submission (RNC) (R2, —) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Magomed Zaynukov
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-07 | Lucas Caldas | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-02-22 | Shakhmar Sadygov | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| — | Earlier regional bout | W | KO/TKO (est.) (—, —) |
| — | Earlier regional bout | W | KO/TKO (est.) (—, —) |
| — | Earlier regional bout | W | KO/TKO (est.) (—, —) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (54.0 vs 60.0) and Grappling Composite (58.0 vs 38.0) — all estimates, since neither debutant is computed by the engine. Balances overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Damian Rzepecki Key Advantages
Rzepecki is the only proven finisher in the cage and he finishes both ways: five submissions (four rear-naked chokes plus a Japanese necktie) and four knockouts (body, head, and a standing knee). That makes him a genuine choke threat in every scramble and a puncher's chance in every exchange — nine of his ten wins have ended early. Against a man with no submission-defense résumé beyond camp inference, his ability to end the night from the back or on the feet is the single highest-upside weapon present. He is the more likely fighter to force a stoppage at any moment.
Grappling is Rzepecki's most distinctive weapon and his clearest path to victory: a rear-naked-choke specialist who hunts the back and finishes from there. Four of his five submissions are RNCs — that is not luck, it is a pattern. His submissions arrive early (R1–R2) and his knockouts late (R2–R3), the signature of a fighter who attacks the choke immediately and breaks opponents down with strikes when it stalls. Any time he gets to the back, the fight can end instantly, and Zaynukov owns zero career submissions and no offensive answer in that phase.
At 24 he is seven years younger than Zaynukov, and his two FEN five-round title fights mean the lights and the deep rounds are not new to him — a rare youth-plus-experience combination for a debutant. His knockout power is varied: a body-shot KO (Duński), a punch KO (Jabłoński), and a standing-knee KO (Esiava). That is precisely the punishment Zaynukov's forward-pressure, short-reach, defense-light pocket style invites — Rzepecki can hurt him in more than one way once the range becomes his, and the fresher athlete owns the championship-distance third round.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Rzepecki shoots or clinches into Zaynukov's camp-honed grappling defense, gets stuffed, and burns energy he cannot replace against a fresher-paced opponent. The Eagles MMA room — daily wrestling and scramble work with elite Dagestani grapplers — is the best takedown defense any newcomer faces, and it is aimed squarely at Rzepecki's only special weapon. If the grappling edge evaporates, the fight becomes a kickboxing match in which the Pole is out-volumed by a dedicated pressure striker.
Zaynukov's constant pressure denies Rzepecki the moment he needs; the finish never materializes, the fight reaches the cards, and the high-output Dagestani sweeps the scorecards exactly as he did against Caldas and Sadygov. Rzepecki has gone the distance just once in ten fights, so out-pointing a cardio-proven volume striker over 15 minutes is the fight least suited to his game. Worse, his untested-at-level chin meets sustained, accurate pocket volume and he becomes the one broken down late.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Rzepecki must turn this into a fight, not a kickboxing match. He should close distance, clinch, and hunt the back early — drag Zaynukov into the grappling phase where the Pole owns the only special weapon. Four RNCs is a pattern, not luck: any time he can get to the back the fight can end instantly, so every scramble is a live finish. The goal is to make the Dagestani defend rather than dictate, and to turn his forward pressure into an opening for the level change.
Against a forward-pressing, short-reach striker, the body-shot KO (the Duński template) and a heavy counter as Zaynukov steps in are Rzepecki's cleanest finishing routes. He cannot bank on out-pointing a cardio-proven volume striker late, so his rounds need to be won decisively or finished, not split — win the early rounds outright while the finishing windows are open. Every entry Zaynukov makes is an invitation for the one clean power shot that has ended four of Rzepecki's fights.
🚀 Magomed Zaynukov Key Advantages
Zaynukov trains at Eagles MMA / the Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov School in Makhachkala — daily work alongside Islam Makhachev, Usman Nurmagomedov, and Gadzhi Rabadanov. It is the strongest UFC-readiness proxy available, and critically it arms him to defend Rzepecki's one special weapon even though he never initiates grappling himself. A pure striker who has spent years being wrestled by elite Dagestani grapplers is not an easy man to hold down or choke. That camp-honed takedown defense and submission literacy is the pivotal, counter-intuitive edge in the fight.
Zaynukov's identity is pace. He set a Contender Series lightweight significant-strike record (a reported 248 landed) and backed it with two full three-round decision wins over a stiffer recent tier (Caldas on DWCS, Sadygov at UAE Warriors) — proof he can pour out volume for 15 minutes without fading. That gives him a reliable points path Rzepecki must chase a finish to deny. His constant pressure also steals initiative from a man who wants to pick his moment: keep the fight at his volume and Rzepecki's danger windows never open cleanly.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Zaynukov's short 68-inch reach and defense-light pocket style walk him onto a single Rzepecki power shot — the body or head KO that has ended four of the Pole's fights — before his volume can take over. A forward-pressure fighter who lives in the pocket eats more return fire than a long-range technician, and Rzepecki's precise, committed one-shot power is exactly the punishment that style invites. The underdog's KO path is always open, and it is open earliest, when Zaynukov is still finding his range.
A scramble goes wrong, Rzepecki takes the back — his RNC specialty — and the camp-inferred defense does not hold against a dedicated choke hunter. Submission is the one phase Zaynukov has no offensive answer for: zero career subs, no takedown offense, nothing to trade back. His defense there is well-evidenced by his room but has never been tested by a four-RNC finisher. And if age 31 shows in a hard third round, the younger man is the fresher finisher exactly when it counts.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Zaynukov's optimal strategy is to set a punishing pace from the bell — pour out volume, keep Rzepecki reactive, and never let him pick his finishing moment. His identity is flat, high, sustained output across all three rounds, the trait that produced a Contender Series strike record and two distance wins. Body and leg accumulation erode a younger man's base and take away the explosive power entries late. Where Rzepecki's danger spikes and dips, Zaynukov's pressure should be the constant that dictates the fight.
He does not need the finish; he needs to out-work a finisher for 15 minutes — exactly the fight he has already won twice against better men. That means staying disciplined defensively in the grappling: sprawl, frame, and get back to the feet, and above all do not freelance into a scramble where the rear-naked choke lives. Trust the cards, keep the exchanges on his terms, and let a cardio-proven volume game bank rounds against a man who has rarely had to swim in deep water.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🕳️A Double Data-Void
This is the most data-scarce matchup type we analyze — two undefeated UFC debutants, neither computed by the engine (one with no row at all). There is no round-by-round tape, no chin tier, no division rank, no fight log for either man. Every composite, cardio number and round split in this file is an estimate built from web-verified records and stylistic reasoning, not from the database — and the conviction rating reflects that honestly. When the spreadsheet is blank on both sides, the read comes from three things you can verify: what each man's finishes reveal about his style, the level he has performed at, and the room he trains in.
🎯The Style Collision, Distilled
Strip it down and the fight is a two-way finisher (Rzepecki) versus a one-way volume striker with elite defensive grappling support (Zaynukov). Rzepecki's grappling is his trump card — and it is pointed at the exact phase Zaynukov, by virtue of his camp, is best built to neutralize. Zaynukov's volume is his trump card, pointed at a man whose deep-water striking endurance is unproven. Each fighter's best weapon attacks the other's least-tested area. The difference is that Zaynukov's defense to Rzepecki's weapon (camp-honed takedown defense) is better-evidenced than Rzepecki's defense to Zaynukov's weapon (untested chin and cardio at volume). On estimated tools the composites are a wash — roughly 60 apiece — so the tiebreaker lives off the spreadsheet.
🧩The Three Questions That Decide It
First: can Rzepecki get it to the mat or the back? If yes, his RNC specialty is a live finish in any round and the lean flips; if Zaynukov's camp-built defense holds, Rzepecki loses his single biggest edge. Second: can Rzepecki land the one shot before the volume buries him? His four-weapon KO power is real and Zaynukov's short-reach, defense-light pocket style invites it — the underdog's cleanest path, and it is always open. Third: whose untested trait fails first — Rzepecki's deep-water durability or Zaynukov's age-31 third round? The cardio evidence favors Zaynukov, the freshness evidence favors Rzepecki, and the archetype baseline (Striker vs Striker, 50.0% over 340 fights) breaks nothing.
🏁Final Prediction
The single most likely individual outcome is Zaynukov by Decision (27%), out-working a finisher over three rounds the way he already out-worked Caldas and Sadygov, with his KO/TKO path (23%) close behind as pressure and power break a debutant. Rzepecki's best route is not one clean number but the sum of his finishing arsenal: submission (19%) is his single highest path — the RNC that is his calling card — with KO/TKO (15%) his cleanest equalizer against a short-reach, defense-light pocket striker. His decision path (11%) is his weakest, since out-pointing a cardio-proven volume striker is the scenario least suited to his game. The lean to the Dagestani rests on level of competition and camp, not on any measurable edge.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 62% | Implied: 48.8%
GOOD VALUE
Model: ~80% | Implied: 66.7%
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 19% | Implied: 20.0%
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Underprices a stoppage – Two finishers by trade; inside-distance is the board's clearest edge (~62% vs 48.8% implied).
- • Two independent finish routes – Zaynukov's volume-and-power KO plus Rzepecki's KO-or-choke arsenal stack onto one fight.
- • Data-void caveat – Neither man is graded by the engine; the 55/45 line is judgment on level and camp, held with humility.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Damian Rzepecki
Highest path — back-take to the RNC that is his calling card
Four-weapon power vs a short-reach, defense-light striker
Weakest path — has gone to the cards once in ten fights
💥Outcome Distribution - Magomed Zaynukov
Largest, most evidence-backed path — out-works him over 15
Volume-and-power (5 KOs) breaks a debutant early
Token — zero career subs; scramble opportunism only
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - Damian Rzepecki
- • Hunt the back early: R1 sub threat is live in every scramble (4 RNCs).
- • One clean shot: Body/head/knee power punishes a short-reach pocket striker.
- • Win rounds outright: Finish or clearly win — do not leave it to the cards.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Magomed Zaynukov
- • Punishing pace: Pour out volume from the bell; keep him reactive.
- • Disciplined grappling: Sprawl, frame, return to feet; avoid the scramble.
- • Bank rounds, trust the cards: Out-work a finisher for 15, as vs Caldas and Sadygov.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
A modest lean on Zaynukov held with real humility — both men are total data voids
✅Supporting Factors
- • Higher recent tier (DWCS, UAE Warriors) vs regional FEN/WOW
- • Eagles MMA — best UFC-readiness proxy available
- • Camp-honed defense neutralizes Rzepecki's one weapon
- • Cardio-validated volume — a proven 15-minute path
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Estimated composites are dead even (~60 each)
- • Rzepecki's 4 RNCs and four-weapon power end any round
- • Zero DB data on either man — no chin, cardio or rank
- • Short reach + light pocket defense invite the one shot
🏁Executive Summary
This is a near-even fight that the database cannot referee. On what we can estimate, the composites are a wash (~60 apiece) and the Striker-vs-Striker archetype baseline is a literal 50.0% coin flip across 340 fights. Our lean to Zaynukov is a judgment call grounded in the things no number here captures: a higher recent tier (a Contender Series strike record plus a UAE Warriors win) against Rzepecki's regional FEN/WOW slate, and the Eagles MMA room — the best UFC-readiness proxy in the sport — specifically arming him to defend the Pole's one special weapon. His cardio-validated volume means Rzepecki likely has to finish to win, while Zaynukov owns a reliable points path. None of that is a blowout factor; all of it points the same modest direction.
Prediction: Magomed Zaynukov def. Damian Rzepecki (55% to 45%). Zaynukov by Decision is the single most likely individual outcome (27%), with his KO/TKO the next-largest lane (23%). But Rzepecki is a live, dangerous underdog: his submission game (19%) is the single most distinctive weapon in the fight, and his four-weapon power (15%) is always one clean shot from flipping it. The pedigree and pace point to Zaynukov — but "The Butcher" finishes nearly everyone he meets, and in Abu Dhabi one tight choke or one clean shot is the most decisive force in a fight neither the engine nor the bookmakers can see clearly.