Women's StrawweightNOT FIGHTING

Miranda Granger
7-3
Age
31
Height
5'7"
Weight
1155 lbs
Reach
68"
Avg Fight Time
09:57
Gym
—
Wins By
1 KO · 5 Sub · 1 Dec
Losses By
—
Wins by Rd
R3 1
Last 4
LLLW
Finish Rate
86%
Bonuses
—
Style
—
Location
Seattle, United States
Fight History
LOSS
CM

vs Cory McKenna
UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Hill· 2025-09-27
Submission
Von Flue Choke From Side Control
R2 1:03
SubmissionVon Flue Choke From Side Control·R2 1:03
LOSS
AY
vs Ashley Yoder
UFC Fight Night: Felder vs. Dos Anjos· 2025-09-27
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
LOSS
AL

vs Amanda Lemos
UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs. The Korean Zombie· 2025-09-27
Submission
Rear Naked Choke
R1 3:43
SubmissionRear Naked Choke·R1 3:43
WIN
HG
vs Hannah Goldy
UFC Fight Night: Covington vs. Lawler· 2025-09-27
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
Fighter Archetype
Muay Thai Fighter
Clinch-Heavy Nak Muay
Why This Archetype
This fighter displays a unique approach that transcends traditional archetypes.
Striking
2.8/min
Grappling
0.00 TD
Defense
58%
⚖️Miranda adapts strategy based on opponent — no predictable tendencies
📊Balanced approach can be difficult to game-plan against
Technique DNA
Striking Foundation
5 rounds of fight film analyzed
🎯
Signature Technique
Leg Kicks
Core of offensive identity
Dominant Level
60%
Of striking volume
Mastery Progress
Primary Arsenal
High Importance
Jabs
60%of arsenal
0%100%
Medium Importance
Elbows
60%of arsenal
0%100%
Supporting Techniques
⭐Other
Knees
60%
⭐Other
Armbars
40%
Triangles
40%
Striking Pattern Analysis
- ◆Signature technique: Heavy reliance on Leg Kicks (60%). Opponents must prepare specifically for this threat.
- ▲Technical diversity: Multiple techniques used at similar rates - adapts based on situations.
- ●Comprehensive striker: Uses head strikes, leg kicks, and varied attacks across distance.
- ■Two-pillar system: Top 2 techniques account for majority (120%) of offensive output.
- ◇Focused arsenal: Top 5 techniques comprise 280% of offense - limited but refined.
- ▶Mixed martial artist: Uses both takedown techniques and submissions in the striking phase.
- ★Adaptive tempo: Switches between pressure and counter-fighting mid-round.
Finish Techniques
No finishes recorded (decision specialist)
Fighter Skills Radar
Key Insights
🥊
Striking specialist: Dominates with devastating volume and accuracy. Avoids ground exchanges.⚠️
Vulnerability: Sub/15min is below average (0/100). Opponents exploit this.🔥
Finisher: 86% of wins end in finish (1 KO + 5 subs).🛡️
Defensive stance: Strong defense (58%) limits opponent output. Conservative approach.⏱️
Fast starter: Peaks early in fights (71% in R3). Front-loads pressure.Striking Profile
Striking Accuracy
47%
Average
0%100%
Striking Defense
58%
Above Avg
0%100%
Range Breakdown
Distance
44% acc69%
Clinch
76% acc27%
Ground
100% acc4%
Striking Differential+0.22/min
2.79 landed/min2.57 absorbed/min
2.79
Landed/Min
2.57
Absorbed/Min
0.00
KD Avg
0
1st Rd Finishes
Sig. Strikes Landed111
Sig. Strikes Attempted236
Key Insights
Uses leg kicks strategically (32%).
Utilizes an effective jab.
Clinch active: 27% of output in the clinch (76% accuracy).
Iron chin: exceptional durability under fire.
Grappling Profile
TD Accuracy
0%
Low
0%100%
TD Defense
33%
Low
0%100%
0.00
TD / 15min
0.00
Sub / 15min
0
TD Landed
0
TD Attempted
Extended Grappling
Key Insights
TD defense at 33% could be a vulnerability.
5 career submission wins.
Submission timing: "Opportunistic" — consistent threat.
Offensive vs Defensive Balance
Damage Exchange
Offensive dominance vs damage absorbed per fight
Dealt
111
5.29
Ratio
Absorbed
21
Chin Rating
IronKD Exchange
0/0
KD Recovery
Never Dropped
Pace & Momentum
Fight pacing and round-over-round performance trends
Engagement Score
21.1
Low Output
Strikes/Min
4.1
Standing %
92%
R3 vs R1 Output
71%
Key Insights
💪 Dominant damage ratio (5.29x) - elite striking efficiency.
🥊 Iron chin - rarely compromised by strikes.
⚙️ High engagement score (21.1) - maintains relentless pace.
✨ Exceptional striking defense - minimizes damage taken.
Round-by-Round Profile
Career average across 4 fights
R1 Control
0:37
R2 Control
0:21
R3 Control
--
R1 to Final
+4%
In-Fight Adaptation
Detected across career, comparing R1 vs R3+ patterns
Adapts targeting and range based on opponent and fatigue.
Target Selection Evolution
Head
+2.0pp
Body
+8.0pp
Leg
-9.9pp
Range Preference Evolution
Ground Shift
-2.3pp
Round Patterns
➡️ Maintains consistent output throughout fight
🔄 Low control time – movement-focused fighter
Competitive Profile
Strength of Schedule
Opponent quality and career progression
Avg Opponent ELO
2877
EliteCareer-wide opponent strength
Conclusions Summary
Fighter characteristics, strengths, patterns, and competitive insights
