WelterweightNOT FIGHTING
Luke Cummo
9-6
Age
43
Height
6'0"
Weight
167 lbs
Reach
—
Avg Fight Time
12:04
Gym
—
Wins By
0 KO · 0 Sub · 0 Dec
Losses By
—
Wins by Rd
R1 1R2 1R3 1
Last 5
WLLWL
Finish Rate
—
Bonuses
—
Style
—
Location
New Hyde Park, United States
Fight History
WIN
Ed
vs Edilberto de Oliveira
UFC Fight Night: Thomas vs Florian· 2025-09-27
KO/TKO
Punches to Head At Distance
R1 1:45
KO/TKOPunches to Head At Distance·R1 1:45
LOSS
TM
vs Tamdan McCrory
UFC 87: Seek And Destroy· 2008-08-09
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
LOSS
LF
vs Luigi Fioravanti
UFC 82: Pride of a Champion· 2008-03-01
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
WIN
JH
vs Josh Haynes
UFC 69: Shootout· 2007-04-07
KO/TKO
Punches to Head At Distance
R2 2:45
KO/TKOPunches to Head At Distance·R2 2:45
LOSS
JG
vs Jonathan Goulet
UFC Fight Night 5· 2006-06-28
Decision - Majority
R3 5:00
Decision - Majority·R3 5:00
WIN
JV
vs Jason Von Flue
UFC Fight Night 4· 2006-04-06
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
LOSS
JS
vs Joe Stevenson
The Ultimate Fighter: Team Hughes vs. Team Franklin Finale
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
Fighter Archetype
Well-Rounded
Balanced MMA
Why This Archetype
This fighter displays a unique approach that transcends traditional archetypes.
Striking
1.7/min
Grappling
0.89 TD
Defense
60%
⚖️Luke adapts strategy based on opponent — no predictable tendencies
📊Balanced approach can be difficult to game-plan against
Technique DNA
No commentary data for technique analysis
Finish Techniques
Striking Finishes
2
100% of career finishes
Submission Finishes
0
0% of career finishes
⚡ Knockout Arsenal (1 techniques)
Punches to Head At Distance
#12
100% of KOs
Finish Pattern Analysis
- ⚡⚡ Striking finisher: 100% of career finishes via knockout/TKO. Devastating striking power and end-game precision.
- 🎯🎯 Signature KO: Punches to Head At Distance (2x, 100% of KOs). Opponents specifically game-plan for this threat.
Fighter Skills Radar
Key Insights
⚖️
Balanced fighter: Threatens equally on feet and mat. No clear weaknesses.💪
Peak strengths: Strike Def% (60%) and Sub/15min (1.4).⚠️
Vulnerability: TD/15min is below average (20/100). Opponents exploit this.🛡️
Defensive stance: Strong defense (60%) limits opponent output. Conservative approach.Striking Profile
Striking Accuracy
43%
Below Avg
0%100%
Striking Defense
60%
Above Avg
0%100%
Range Breakdown
Distance
38% acc56%
Clinch
64% acc27%
Ground
66% acc18%
Striking Differential+0.24/min
1.74 landed/min1.50 absorbed/min
1.74
Landed/Min
1.50
Absorbed/Min
0.71
KD Avg
0
1st Rd Finishes
Sig. Strikes Landed147
Sig. Strikes Attempted340
Key Insights
Effective body attack (34%).
Clinch active: 27% of output in the clinch (64% accuracy).
Effective ground striker: 18% from ground at 66% accuracy.
Iron chin: exceptional durability under fire.
Elite KD exchange: deals 8.0x more knockdowns than absorbed.
Grappling Profile
TD Accuracy
56%
Above Avg
0%100%
TD Defense
43%
Below Avg
0%100%
TD Success Rate
56%(est)
Landed
5
Defended
4
Total
9
Note: Takedowns landed estimated from accuracy percentage
0.89
TD / 15min
1.42
Sub / 15min
0
TD Landed
9
TD Attempted
Extended Grappling
Clinch Takedowns
10
Landed
18
Attempted
56%
Accuracy
Submission Timing
8 total attempts
Late Round Sub Artist
R1
0%
R2
38%
R3
63%
Key Insights
TD defense at 43% could be a vulnerability.
Active submission threat (1.42/15min).
High TD accuracy (56%).
Submission timing: "Late Round Sub Artist" — dangerous in later rounds.
Offensive vs Defensive Balance
Damage Exchange
Offensive dominance vs damage absorbed per fight
Dealt
294
1.20
Ratio
Absorbed
244
Chin Rating
IronKD Exchange
8/0
KD Recovery
Never Dropped
Pace & Momentum
Fight pacing and round-over-round performance trends
Engagement Score
24.1
Low Output
Strikes/Min
4.1
Standing %
87%
R3 vs R1 Output
103%
Key Insights
🥊 Iron chin - rarely compromised by strikes.
🎯 Effective knockdown technician - deals significantly more than absorbs.
⚙️ High engagement score (24.1) - maintains relentless pace.
Round-by-Round Profile
Career average across 7 fights
R1 Control
0:20
R2 Control
0:53
R3 Control
0:46
R1 to Final
-18%
In-Fight Adaptation
Detected across career, comparing R1 vs R3+ patterns
Transitions to grappling-heavy strategy in later rounds (+15.3pp).
Target Selection Evolution
Head
-10.6pp
Body
+15.1pp
Leg
-4.4pp
Range Preference Evolution
Ground Shift
+15.3pp
Round Patterns
➡️ Maintains consistent output throughout fight
🔄 Low control time – movement-focused fighter
Conclusions Summary
Fighter characteristics, strengths, patterns, and competitive insights