HeavyweightNOT FIGHTING
Jim Mullen
0-0
Age
—
Height
--
Weight
—
Reach
—
Avg Fight Time
00:00
Gym
—
Wins By
0 KO · 0 Sub · 0 Dec
Losses By
—
Wins by Rd
—
Last 1
L
Finish Rate
—
Bonuses
—
Style
—
Location
Simi Valley, United States
Fight History
LOSS
SF
vs Scott Ferrozzo
UFC 12: Judgement Day· 1997-02-07
KO/TKO
Knees to Head On Ground
R1 8:02
KO/TKOKnees to Head On Ground·R1 8:02
Fighter Archetype
Well-Rounded
Balanced MMA
Why This Archetype
This fighter displays a unique approach that transcends traditional archetypes.
Striking
0.0/min
Grappling
0.00 TD
Defense
0%
⚖️Jim adapts strategy based on opponent — no predictable tendencies
📊Balanced approach can be difficult to game-plan against
Technique DNA
No commentary data for technique analysis
Finish Techniques
No finishes recorded (decision specialist)
Fighter Skills Radar
Key Insights
⚖️
Balanced fighter: Threatens equally on feet and mat. No clear weaknesses.⚠️
Vulnerability: Sub/15min is below average (0/100). Opponents exploit this.Striking Profile
Striking Accuracy
0%
Low
0%100%
Striking Defense
0%
Low
0%100%
Range Breakdown
Distance
33% acc33%
Clinch
100% acc67%
Ground
0%
0.00
Landed/Min
0.00
Absorbed/Min
0.00
KD Avg
0
1st Rd Finishes
Key Insights
Clinch active: 67% of output in the clinch (100% accuracy).
Iron chin: exceptional durability under fire.
Grappling Profile
TD Accuracy
0%
Low
0%100%
TD Defense
0%
Low
0%100%
0.00
TD / 15min
0.00
Sub / 15min
0
TD Landed
0
TD Attempted
Extended Grappling
Key Insights
TD defense at 0% could be a vulnerability.
Submission timing: "Opportunistic" — consistent threat.
Offensive vs Defensive Balance
Damage Exchange
Offensive dominance vs damage absorbed per fight
Dealt
6
0.10
Ratio
Absorbed
60
Chin Rating
IronKD Exchange
0/0
KD Recovery
Never Dropped
Pace & Momentum
Fight pacing and round-over-round performance trends
Engagement Score
4.0
Low Output
Strikes/Min
0.8
Standing %
100%
Key Insights
⚠️ Damage ratio below 1.0 (0.10x) - absorbs more than deals.
🥊 Iron chin - rarely compromised by strikes.
🎢 High striking absorption - takes significant damage in exchanges.
Round-by-Round Profile
Career average across 1 fights
In-Fight Adaptation
Detected across career, comparing R1 vs R3+ patterns
Maintains consistent approach throughout fights - minimal adaptation.
Target Selection Evolution
Head
--
Body
--
Leg
--
Range Preference Evolution
Conclusions Summary
Fighter characteristics, strengths, patterns, and competitive insights