Women's StrawweightACTIVE

Emily Ducote

13-9

Age

Height

5'2"

Weight

1195 lbs

Reach

63"

Avg Fight Time

15:00

Gym

—

Wins By

3 KO · 4 Sub · 6 Dec

Losses By

—

Wins by Rd

R3 2

Last 5

LWLLW

Finish Rate

54%

Bonuses

—

Style

MMA

Location

San Jose, United States

Fight History

LOSS

vs Vanessa Demopoulos

UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Murphy· 2025-09-27

Decision - Split

R3 5:00

Decision - Split·R3 5:00

WIN

vs Ashley Yoder

UFC Fight Night: Yusuff vs. Barboza· 2025-09-27

Decision - Unanimous

R3 5:00

Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00

LOSS

vs Loopy Godinez

UFC Fight Night: Dern vs. Hill· 2025-09-27

Decision - Unanimous

R3 5:00

Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00

LOSS

vs Angela Hill

UFC Fight Night: Thompson vs. Holland· 2025-09-27

Decision - Unanimous

R3 5:00

Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00

WIN

vs Jessica Penne

UFC Fight Night: Ortega vs. Rodriguez· 2025-09-27

Decision - Unanimous

R3 5:00

Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00

Fighter Archetype

Technical Striker

Counter Striker

Why This Archetype

This fighter displays a unique approach that transcends traditional archetypes.

Striking

7.5/min

Grappling

0.20 TD

Defense

58%

⚖️Emily adapts strategy based on opponent — no predictable tendencies

📊Balanced approach can be difficult to game-plan against

Technique DNA

Striking Foundation

15 rounds of fight film analyzed

🎯

Signature Technique

Leg Kicks

Core of offensive identity

Dominant Level

87%

Of striking volume

Mastery Progress

Primary Arsenal

High Importance

Jabs

67%of arsenal

0%100%

Medium Importance

Knees

67%of arsenal

0%100%

Supporting Techniques

🥊Head/Hand

Head Kicks

53%

🤼Clinch

Elbows

47%

⭐Other

Counters

47%

Common Combinations

Distance → Clinch

1× detected

Clinch → Takedown

1× detected

Patterns detected from round-by-round fight data

Striking Pattern Analysis

◆Signature technique: Heavy reliance on Leg Kicks (87%). Opponents must prepare specifically for this threat.
▲Technical diversity: Multiple techniques used at similar rates - adapts based on situations.
●Comprehensive striker: Uses head strikes, leg kicks, and varied attacks across distance.
■Two-pillar system: Top 2 techniques account for majority (154%) of offensive output.
◇Focused arsenal: Top 5 techniques comprise 321% of offense - limited but refined.
▶Mixed martial artist: Uses both takedown techniques and submissions in the striking phase.
★Adaptive tempo: Switches between pressure and counter-fighting mid-round.

Finish Techniques

No finishes recorded (decision specialist)

Fighter Skills Radar

Key Insights

🥊

Striking specialist: Dominates with devastating volume and accuracy. Avoids ground exchanges.

💪

Peak strengths: Strikes/Min (7.5) and Strike Def% (58%).

⚠️

Vulnerability: Sub/15min is below average (0/100). Opponents exploit this.

🚫

Anti-wrestler: 94% TD defense. Keeps fights standing.

📈

Pace builder: Output increases in later rounds (153% in R3). Outworks opponents.

Striking Profile

Striking Accuracy

52%

Average

0%100%

Striking Defense

58%

Above Avg

0%100%

Range Breakdown

Distance

51% acc97%

Clinch

62% acc3%

Ground

100% acc1%

Striking Differential-0.39/min

7.45 landed/min7.84 absorbed/min

7.45

Landed/Min

7.84

Absorbed/Min

0.00

KD Avg

1st Rd Finishes

Sig. Strikes Landed559

Sig. Strikes Attempted1072

Key Insights

Emily is a distance-first striker, with 97% of output at range.

Uses leg kicks strategically (23%).

Utilizes an effective jab.

Distance-dominant: 97% of output at range with 51% accuracy.

Iron chin: exceptional durability under fire.

High pace fighter: 7.7 strikes/min engagement.

Grappling Profile

TD Accuracy

14%

Low

0%100%

TD Defense

94%

Elite

0%100%

TD Success Rate

14%(est)

Landed

Defended

Total

Note: Takedowns landed estimated from accuracy percentage

0.20

TD / 15min

0.00

Sub / 15min

TD Landed

TD Attempted

Extended Grappling

Key Insights

Rarely initiates takedowns (0.20/15min).

Elite TD defense (94%).

4 career submission wins.

Lower TD accuracy (14%).

Submission timing: "Opportunistic" — consistent threat.

Offensive vs Defensive Balance

Damage Exchange

Offensive dominance vs damage absorbed per fight

Dealt

0.00

Ratio

Absorbed

972

Chin Rating

Iron

KD Exchange

0/0

KD Recovery

Never Dropped

Pace & Momentum

Fight pacing and round-over-round performance trends

Engagement Score

40.9

High

Strikes/Min

7.7

Standing %

99%

R3 vs R1 Output

153%

Strong Finisher

Key Insights

⚠️ Damage ratio below 1.0 (0.00x) - absorbs more than deals.

🥊 Iron chin - rarely compromised by strikes.

⚙️ High engagement score (40.9) - maintains relentless pace.

📈 Improves dramatically in late rounds - R3 output 153% of R1.

Round-by-Round Profile

Career average across 5 fights

R1 Control

0:03

R2 Control

R3 Control

0:09

R1 to Final

+53%

In-Fight Adaptation

Detected across career, comparing R1 vs R3+ patterns

Adapts targeting and range based on opponent and fatigue.

Target Selection Evolution

Head

+6.9pp

Body

-4.0pp

Leg

-2.9pp

Range Preference Evolution

Ground Shift

+1.3pp

Round Patterns

⬆️ Improves with fight duration – strong finishing power

💪 Peak performance in final round

🔄 Low control time – movement-focused fighter

Conclusions Summary

Fighter characteristics, strengths, patterns, and competitive insights