Women's StrawweightRETIRED

Anna Elmose
3-2
Age
39
Height
5'3"
Weight
116 lbs
Reach
65"
Avg Fight Time
09:23
Gym
Rumble Sports - Copenhagen
Wins By
3 KO · 0 Sub · 0 Dec
Losses By
—
Wins by Rd
—
Last 2
LL
Finish Rate
100%
Bonuses
—
Style
—
Location
Aarhus, Denmark
Fight History
LOSS
AC

vs Amanda Cooper
UFC Fight Night: Mousasi vs. Hall 2· 2025-09-27
Decision - Unanimous
R3 5:00
Decision - Unanimous·R3 5:00
LOSS
Gd

vs Germaine de Randamie
UFC Fight Night: Overeem vs Arlovski· 2025-09-27
KO/TKO
Knee to Body In Clinch
R1 3:46
KO/TKOKnee to Body In Clinch·R1 3:46
Fighter Archetype
Striker
Boxing-Heavy
Why This Archetype
This fighter displays a unique approach that transcends traditional archetypes.
Striking
3.7/min
Grappling
0.00 TD
Defense
57%
⚖️Anna adapts strategy based on opponent — no predictable tendencies
📊Balanced approach can be difficult to game-plan against
Technique DNA
No commentary data for technique analysis
Finish Techniques
No finishes recorded (decision specialist)
Fighter Skills Radar
Key Insights
🥊
Striking specialist: Dominates with devastating volume and accuracy. Avoids ground exchanges.⚠️
Vulnerability: Sub/15min is below average (0/100). Opponents exploit this.🔥
Finisher: 100% of wins end in finish (3 KO + 0 subs).Striking Profile
Striking Accuracy
50%
Average
0%100%
Striking Defense
57%
Above Avg
0%100%
Range Breakdown
Distance
44% acc70%
Clinch
67% acc10%
Ground
58% acc20%
Striking Differential-0.96/min
3.68 landed/min4.64 absorbed/min
3.68
Landed/Min
4.64
Absorbed/Min
0.80
KD Avg
0
1st Rd Finishes
Sig. Strikes Landed69
Sig. Strikes Attempted139
Key Insights
Anna is a distance-first striker, with 70% of output at range.
Effective ground striker: 20% from ground at 58% accuracy.
Grappling Profile
TD Accuracy
0%
Low
0%100%
TD Defense
33%
Low
0%100%
TD Success Rate
0%
Landed
0
Defended
5
Total
5
0.00
TD / 15min
0.00
Sub / 15min
0
TD Landed
5
TD Attempted
Extended Grappling
Clinch Takedowns
0
Landed
10
Attempted
0%
Accuracy
Key Insights
TD defense at 33% could be a vulnerability.
Submission timing: "Opportunistic" — consistent threat.
Ground active: 20% of output from ground position.
Offensive vs Defensive Balance
Damage Exchange
Offensive dominance vs damage absorbed per fight
Dealt
138
0.79
Ratio
Absorbed
174
Chin Rating
AverageKD Exchange
2/2
KD Recovery
0%
Pace & Momentum
Fight pacing and round-over-round performance trends
Engagement Score
34.6
Moderate
Strikes/Min
5.3
Standing %
79%
R3 vs R1 Output
93%
Key Insights
⚠️ Damage ratio below 1.0 (0.79x) - absorbs more than deals.
⚙️ High engagement score (34.6) - maintains relentless pace.
Round-by-Round Profile
Career average across 2 fights
R1 Control
1:33
R2 Control
1:02
R3 Control
--
R1 to Final
+52%
In-Fight Adaptation
Detected across career, comparing R1 vs R3+ patterns
Shifts to headhunting late (+22.5pp in R3).
Target Selection Evolution
Head
+22.5pp
Body
-7.3pp
Leg
-15.3pp
Range Preference Evolution
Ground Shift
-27.3pp
Round Patterns
⬆️ Improves with fight duration – strong finishing power
💪 Peak performance in final round
🔄 Low control time – movement-focused fighter
Conclusions Summary
Fighter characteristics, strengths, patterns, and competitive insights
