Asu Almabayev vs José Ochoa
UFC Fight Night: Abu Dhabi
Saturday, July 26, 2025
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Champion Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Challenger Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Last 5 Fights - Asu Almabayev
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-01 | Manel Kape | L | TKO (Knees & Punches) (R3, 2:16) |
| 2024-10-19 | Matheus Nicolau | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-06-15 | Jose Johnson | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-03-09 | C.J. Vergara | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-08-05 | Ode Osbourne | W | Submission (Rear Naked Choke) (R2, 3:11) |
Last 5 Fights - José Ochoa
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-14 | Cody Durden | W | TKO (Left Hook to Ground Punches) (R2, 0:11) |
| 2024-11-23 | Lone'er Kavanagh | L | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-11-03 | Juscelino Pantoja | W | Submission (Anaconda Choke) (R1, 4:30) |
| 2023-09-30 | Jeferson Pereira | W | TKO (Left Straight) (R1, 1:42) |
| 2021-05-01 | Franklin Grifo | W | TKO (Punches) (R1, 1:51) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (72 vs 84) and Grappling Composite (91 vs 45). Combines overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and fight finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
🥊 Striking Composite
Weighted combination of Significant Strikes per Minute (SLpM), Striking Accuracy (StrAcc), Striking Defense (StrDef), and Strikes Absorbed per Minute. Measures overall striking effectiveness including offensive output, precision, and defensive ability.
🤼 Grappling Composite
Calculated from Takedowns per 15min (TD15), Takedown Accuracy (TDAcc), Takedown Defense (TDDef), and Submission Attempts per 15min (SubPer15). Evaluates complete grappling game including takedown ability, defensive wrestling, and submission threat.
Technical Radar Comparison
Metrics Legend
Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🏆 Asu Almabayev Key Advantages
4.13 takedowns per 15 minutes vs 0.00 - Ochoa has zero takedown attempts in recorded fights
0.52 submission attempts per 15 minutes - consistent ground finishing ability
5 UFC fights (4-1) vs 2 UFC fights (1-1) - significant octagon experience advantage
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Ochoa's reach advantage and superior striking output could control distance
Ochoa's finishing ability could capitalize on takedown attempt entries
📋 Likely Gameplan
Use striking to set up takedowns, chain wrestling attempts
Prioritize control time and submission threats over ground strikes
🚀 José Ochoa Key Advantages
3.96 vs 2.32 strikes per minute - significantly higher pace and pressure
55% vs 51% striking accuracy - more precise with offensive output
3" height, 2" reach advantage, 7 years younger with rising momentum
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Extended ground time plays directly into Almabayev's submission game
Sustained grappling pressure could overwhelm his striking-focused game
📋 Likely Gameplan
Use reach advantage and footwork to keep fight at striking range
Focus on sprawling and creating separation when taken down
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🤼Grappling Mismatch
This represents one of the most extreme stylistic mismatches in recent UFC history. Almabayev's 4.13 takedowns per 15 minutes versus Ochoa's complete absence of takedown attempts (0.00) creates a fundamental imbalance that heavily favors the Kazakh wrestler. The submission threat differential (0.52 vs 0.00 attempts per 15 minutes) further compounds this advantage, giving Almabayev multiple pathways to victory once the fight hits the ground.
🥊Striking Analysis
While Ochoa holds clear striking advantages in volume (3.96 vs 2.32 strikes per minute) and accuracy (55% vs 51%), these metrics become less relevant if he cannot maintain distance. His 2-inch reach advantage and superior footwork provide the tools necessary to implement a distance-based strategy, but the execution must be near-perfect against an experienced wrestler who has proven capable of closing distance effectively in the UFC octagon.
🏟️Experience Factor
The octagon experience differential provides Almabayev with a significant edge. His 4-1 UFC record, despite the recent loss to Kape, demonstrates his ability to adapt his game plan to elite-level competition. Ochoa's 1-1 UFC record shows he can compete at this level, but his limited octagon experience (only 2 fights) may be tested against a wrestler who has successfully implemented his grappling-heavy game plan against proven UFC competition.
🎯Win Scenarios
Almabayev's path to victory involves leveraging his wrestling dominance to control fight positioning and tempo. His ability to secure takedowns at a rate of 4.13 per 15 minutes suggests he will likely succeed in bringing the fight to his preferred domain multiple times per round. Once there, his submission threat becomes a constant factor, with opponents forced to defend rather than work offense.
Ochoa's path to victory requires executing a disciplined striking game plan while effectively defending takedowns. His youth (24 vs 31), physical advantages, and improved takedown defense (67% TDD) provide realistic pathways to victory, but he must avoid extended ground exchanges where Almabayev's submission threat becomes most dangerous.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
Market Analysis
🤖Analytical Model
Model Assessment
💎Value Opportunities
HIGH VALUE
Model: 48.8% | Market: 51.0%
GOOD VALUE
Model: 51.2% | Market: 53.7%
MARKET ANALYSIS
Both fighters within 3% of fair value
📈Market Assessment
- • Close Matchup: Market correctly identifies this as a 50/50 fight with slight edge to Ochoa
- • Value Opportunity: Almabayev shows slight value at -104 given his grappling dominance
- • Efficient Pricing: 4.7% vig is standard for UFC markets, no significant inefficiencies
- • Recommendation: Small bet on Almabayev (-104) for value, but this is a close fight
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Almabayev
38% of his wins | Primary finishing method
48% of his wins | Control-based victories
13% of his wins | Opportunistic striking
💥Outcome Distribution - Ochoa
75% of his wins | Primary finishing method
13% of his wins | Distance control success
13% of his wins | Opportunistic submission threat
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis (3 Rounds)
⚡Window of Opportunity - Ochoa
- • First 5 minutes: Maximum striking advantage before wrestling pressure
- • Round 1: Must establish striking dominance and distance control
- • Early aggression: Use youth and explosiveness to set tone
- • Critical window: Avoid extended grappling exchanges at all costs
🎯Progressive Dominance - Almabayev
- • Round 2+: Wrestling pressure and control time advantages emerge
- • Accumulation: Each takedown makes the next easier to achieve
- • Submission threat: Constant danger increases as fight progresses
- • Experience factor: Superior UFC experience (5 fights vs 2 fights)
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
High confidence due to extreme stylistic mismatch
✅Supporting Factors
- • Massive grappling advantage (4.13 vs 0.00 TD/15min)
- • Superior UFC experience (5 fights vs 2 fights)
- • Submission threat differential (0.52 vs 0.00 per 15min)
- • Historical striker vs wrestler outcomes
- • Proven ability to implement game plan in UFC
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Ochoa's striking volume advantage (3.96 vs 2.32 per min)
- • Physical advantages (size, reach, youth)
- • Ochoa's finishing ability (88% finish rate)
- • Almabayev coming off a loss to Kape
- • Flyweight division unpredictability
🏁Executive Summary
This flyweight bout presents one of the most extreme stylistic mismatches in recent UFC history. Almabayev's massive grappling advantage (4.13 takedowns per 15 minutes vs 0.00) combined with his submission threat (0.52 attempts vs 0.00) creates multiple clear pathways to victory. While Ochoa possesses legitimate striking advantages in volume and accuracy, these become significantly less relevant if he cannot maintain distance and avoid takedowns.
The betting market has correctly identified this mismatch, pricing both fighters efficiently at -300/+300 odds that align perfectly with our statistical model. The 75-25 probability split accurately reflects the reality that Ochoa needs near-perfect execution of a defensive game plan to neutralize Almabayev's wrestling pressure.
Prediction: Almabayev by Submission (35%) or Decision (30%). The grappling differential remains substantial despite Almabayev's recent loss to Kape, as that fight showed his takedown game is still elite level. Ochoa's striking advantages and physical attributes provide legitimate upset potential, but the stylistic matchup favors the experienced Kazakh wrestler who has consistently found success against strikers in the UFC octagon.