Jimmy Crute vs Marcin Prachnio
Light Heavyweight Bout • UFC 318: Holloway vs. Poirier 3
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Last 5 Fights - Jimmy Crute
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2025-02-08 | Rodolfo Bellato | D | Decision - Majority Draw (R3, 5:00) |
2023-07-08 | Alonzo Menifield | L | Submission - Guillotine (R2, 1:55) |
2023-02-11 | Alonzo Menifield | D | Decision - Majority Draw (R3, 5:00) |
2021-12-04 | Jamahal Hill | L | KO - Right Hook (R1, 0:48) |
2021-04-24 | Anthony Smith | L | TKO - Leg Injury/Doctor Stoppage (R1, 5:00) |
Last 5 Fights - Marcin Prachnio
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-27 | Modestas Bukauskas | L | Submission - Arm Triangle (R3, 3:12) |
2024-02-10 | Devin Clark | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2023-07-08 | Vitor Petrino | L | Submission - Arm Triangle (R3, 3:42) |
2023-02-18 | William Knight | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2022-04-23 | Phillipe Lins | L | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (86 vs 100) and Grappling Composite (100 vs 34). Combines overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and fight finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
🥊 Striking Composite
Weighted combination of Significant Strikes per Minute (SLpM), Striking Accuracy (StrAcc), Striking Defense (StrDef), and Strikes Absorbed per Minute. Measures overall striking effectiveness including offensive output, precision, and defensive ability.
🤼 Grappling Composite
Calculated from Takedowns per 15min (TD15), Takedown Accuracy (TDAcc), Takedown Defense (TDDef), and Submission Attempts per 15min (SubPer15). Evaluates complete grappling game including takedown ability, defensive wrestling, and submission threat.
Technical Radar Comparison
Metrics Legend
Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
Comprehensive technical and tactical analysis
⭐ Crute Key Advantages
🤼 Grappling Dominance
Elite Level3.86 takedowns per 15 minutes at 53% accuracy with elite submission threat (1.62 per 15min). His top pressure and submission game mirror Prachnio's worst defensive vulnerabilities.
💪 Physical Prime
Age AdvantageAt 28 years old vs 36, Crute brings youth and strength advantages crucial for attrition grappling. His +8 years advantage becomes critical in late rounds.
🔄 Fight Control
Stylistic EdgeControls where the fight happens with superior wrestling. Can neutralize Prachnio's striking volume by forcing grappling exchanges where he holds massive advantages.
🔥 Prachnio Key Advantages
💥 Volume Striking
5.57 SLpMHigher striking output and 54% accuracy combined with superior striking defense (54% vs 42%). Can outpoint Crute if he maintains distance and avoids takedowns.
📐 Range Management
Karate StyleKarate background allows him to use lateral movement and calf kicks to control distance. The large cage gives him space to circle away from Crute's wrestling entries.
💪 Cardio Edge
10:16 avgLonger average fight duration suggests superior cardiovascular endurance. Can maintain high pace against Crute's explosive but potentially draining grappling.
⚠️ Crute - Unfavorable Scenarios
🛡️ Striking Defense
Poor 42% striking defense makes him vulnerable to Prachnio's volume. Recent losses to Menifield and Hill show he can be hurt by clean shots during takedown entries.
📊 Recent Form
0-2-2 in last four fights with troubling pattern of being finished or dominated. His confidence and timing may be compromised entering this crucial matchup.
⚡ Takedown Timing
If his takedown entries become predictable, Prachnio's footwork and sprawls could neutralize his main weapon, forcing him into unfavorable striking exchanges.
⚠️ Prachnio - Unfavorable Scenarios
🤼 Grappling Defense
Just 0.15 takedowns per 15 minutes and 54% takedown defense against Crute's elite wrestling. Two recent arm triangle submissions show his vulnerability on the ground.
📉 Submission Threat
Minimal submission attempts per 15 minutes means limited offensive ground game. Once taken down, he relies mostly on defensive escapes against Crute's active submission hunting.
🏃 Distance Management
While good at maintaining distance, he must avoid getting pressured to the fence where Crute's wrestling becomes most dangerous and his lateral movement is limited.
🎯 Likely Gameplans
Crute Strategy
Feint overhand rights to set up blast doubles against the fence. Once on top, advance to half-guard and hunt for arm-triangle or kimura submissions. His goal is to secure dominant positions early and either finish the fight or grind out control time for a decision victory.
Prachnio Strategy
Southpaw stance to attack Crute's lead leg with calf kicks while pivoting off the center logo to maintain distance. Accumulate volume early with body kicks and jabs, sprawl when threatened with takedowns, and look to outpoint Crute over three rounds or catch him with clean shots.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Probabilistic simulation based on 100 hypothetical fights and statistical analysis
🎲Probabilistic Simulation (100 Hypothetical Fights)
Key matchup factors: grappling vs striking, takedown defense, and submission vulnerability
🛡️ Takedown Defense
If Crute hits just one early double, momentum swings heavily his way. Prachnio's 54% TD defense faces elite 3.86 TD/15min rate - a critical early exchange that determines fight location.
⚔️ Attrition Battle
Prachnio's body and leg kicks accumulate damage, but one Crute level change erases minutes of striking work. The 66-point grappling composite gap is decisive once grounded.
📈 Form & Momentum
Crute's 0-2-2 recent skid vs Prachnio's submission losses create uncertainty. Neither fighter enters with strong momentum, but Crute's skillset aligns perfectly with Prachnio's weaknesses.
📊 Simulation Outcome
Crute wins 65 times: primarily via submission (30) or TKO (20) or decision (15), leveraging his grappling superiority to control and finish fights.
Prachnio wins 35 times: mostly via TKO (20) or decision (14) with rare guillotine (1), using volume striking and distance control to outpoint or catch Crute.
🎯Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🔥Outcome Distribution - Crute
46.2% of his wins | Elite grappling vs weak TDD
30.8% of his wins | Ground and pound or standing
23.1% of his wins | Grappling control wins rounds
🥋Outcome Distribution - Prachnio
57.1% of his wins | Volume striking accumulation
40.0% of his wins | Distance control strategy
2.9% of his wins | Rare guillotine opportunity
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
🤼Grappling Dominance - Crute
- • First takedown: Sets tone for entire fight
- • Round 1: 67% of his finishes occur here
- • Top pressure: Wears down Prachnio's defense
- • Youth advantage: 28 vs 36 favors Crute's pace
🥊Volume Striking - Prachnio
- • Distance control: Must avoid clinch and takedowns
- • Round 3+: 71% finish rate, strong KO power
- • Calf kicks: Neutralize Crute's explosive shots
- • Cardio edge: 10:16 avg fight duration
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
Market Props
🤖Analytical Model
Model Props
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 35% | Market: 28.6%
GOOD VALUE
Model: 30% | Market: 36.4%
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 32.3% | Market: 44.4%
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Overvalues Crute's grappling dominance - Market moved to -300 ignoring his 0-2-2 recent form and poor striking defense
- • Undervalues Prachnio's path to victory - Superior volume striking (5.57 SLpM) and defensive metrics create value at +250
- • Misprices submission props - Crute by submission at +175 reflects market confidence but our model shows 30% probability
- • Round total discrepancy - Market expects more finishes (Under 2.5 at -155) while model sees 32.3% chance of distance
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
Moderate confidence with clear stylistic advantage offset by form concerns
✅Supporting Factors
- • Clear grappling dominance (100 vs 34)
- • Perfect stylistic matchup
- • Age & physicality advantage
- • Submission threat aligns with weakness
- • Recent submission pattern
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Crute's poor recent form (0-2-2)
- • Vulnerable striking defense (42%)
- • Prachnio's volume striking
- • Distance management skills
- • Potential takedown timing issues
🏁Executive Summary
This light heavyweight clash presents a textbook grappler vs striker matchup with Crute's elite submission game facing Prachnio's superior volume striking. The statistical data reveals a 66-point grappling composite gap, directly targeting Prachnio's weakest defensive area (54% TDD vs 3.86 TD/15min rate).
Crute's recent form concerns (0-2-2 in last four) and poor striking defense (42%) create legitimate uncertainty. However, Prachnio's vulnerability to submissions (two recent arm triangle losses) and minimal offensive grappling threat strongly favor Crute's path to victory through takedowns and top control.
Prediction: Crute overcomes recent struggles to impose his grappling game early, securing takedowns and advancing to dominant positions. His youth advantage (28 vs 36) and submission expertise prove decisive in a fight that likely ends via arm triangle or kimura submission within the first two rounds.