Sean Brady vs Michael Morales
UFC 322 • Large Cage (30 ft)
Saturday, November 15, 2025
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Last 5 Fights - Sean Brady
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-22 | Leon Edwards | W | Submission - Guillotine Choke (R4, 1:39) |
| 2024-09-07 | Gilbert Burns | W | Decision - Unanimous (R5, 5:00) |
| 2023-12-02 | Kelvin Gastelum | W | Submission - Kimura (R3, 1:43) |
| 2022-10-22 | Belal Muhammad | L | TKO - Punches (R2, 4:47) |
| 2021-11-20 | Michael Chiesa | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
Last 5 Fights - Michael Morales
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-17 | Gilbert Burns | W | TKO - Punches (R1, 3:39) |
| 2024-08-24 | Neil Magny | W | TKO - Punches (R1, 4:39) |
| 2023-11-18 | Jake Matthews | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-07-01 | Max Griffin | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
| 2022-07-30 | Adam Fugitt | W | TKO - Punches (R3, 1:09) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Sean Brady advantage: 23.9%Cardio Score
Sean Brady advantage: 9.3%Overall Rating
Sean Brady advantage: 16.2%📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (78 vs 72) and Grappling Composite (89 vs 61). Combines overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and fight finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and sustained pace.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Sean Brady advantage: 8.3%Grappling Composite
Sean Brady advantage: 45.9%🥊 Striking Composite
Weighted combination of Significant Strikes per Minute (SLpM), Striking Accuracy (StrAcc), Striking Defense (StrDef), and Strikes Absorbed per Minute. Measures overall striking effectiveness including output, precision, and defensive ability.
🤼 Grappling Composite
Calculated from Takedowns per 15min (TD15), Takedown Accuracy (TDAcc), Takedown Defense (TDDef), and Submission Attempts per 15min (SubPer15). Evaluates takedown ability, defensive wrestling, and submission threat.
Technical Radar Comparison
Metrics Legend
Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🏆 Sean Brady Key Advantages
Brady's wrestling volume is suffocating—3.62 takedowns per 15 minutes at 54% accuracy creates relentless pressure cycles that overwhelm sprawl-first defenders. Against Chiesa, he logged 7 attempts and forced constant clinch resets. Against Burns, he attempted 11 takedowns over 25 minutes, converting 6 for 15+ minutes of control time across five rounds.
The real threat isn't just takedowns—it's the chain-wrestling that follows denials. Even when Morales' 89% TDD holds on the first layer, Brady's hip flexibility and hand-fighting allow immediate re-attacks from under-hooks or body locks. His 0.93 submission attempts per 15 mean guillotines and arm-triangles are always live from top position or transitions, forcing opponents to respect control and stay defensive.
Brady's 59% striking defense is a full 6 percentage points higher than Morales' 53%, which translates to meaningful durability over three rounds. In the pocket, Brady's tight guard, head movement, and shoulder rolls limit clean connects. He absorbs only 2.94 significant strikes per minute compared to Morales' 3.31—that's 13% less accumulated damage per round.
This defensive edge compounds over 15 minutes: Brady banks ~44 absorbed strikes across a full fight versus Morales' projected ~50. Against power strikers like Gastelum and Burns, Brady's evasion allowed him to survive early exchanges and grind late. The margin matters when closing distance—every whiffed counter is a free entry layer for wrestling attempts without eating concussive damage.
In a 30-foot cage, distance resets favor Morales—but Brady's wall-riding expertise and mat returns neutralize that space quickly. Once contact is made, Brady excels at riding the fence for 30–60 seconds, grinding hips and framing on the head to exhaust sprawls. Even when Morales explodes to his feet, Brady's mat return timing and grip strength often pull him back down, converting defensive scrambles into control minutes for judging.
This "minute-winning" approach stacks rounds without finishing—Brady's 50% decision rate reflects his comfort banking 2+ minutes of control per round. Against Matthews and Chiesa, he secured unanimous 30-27s by layering short clinch/takedown cycles throughout rounds, never allowing opponents to sustain offensive tempo. For a three-round fight, 2–3 completed takedowns plus fence time is often enough for two rounds—and Brady's cardio (8.2/10) means the pressure never fades late.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
If Morales maintains center octagon and keeps Brady at 7+ inches distance for extended stretches, the wrestler must cover ground under fire. Long jab sequences and circle-away resets in the big cage can stall entries and force Brady to shoot from farther out—reducing TD accuracy and increasing exposure to counters. Multiple clean minutes at range per round flip the script.
Brady's only UFC loss came via R2 KO to Belal after repeated failed TDs left him exposed in the pocket. When Brady shoots and misses, he's vulnerable to pull-counters with the right hand—Morales' signature finish. In R1, when power and speed are at max and Brady is still setting tempo, those windows are widest. One clean counter can end it before wrestling compounds.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Initiate contact in the opening 60–90 seconds with clinch entries or single/double-leg attempts. Even if Morales stuffs the first shot, chain immediately to under-hooks or body locks to force defensive wrestling and tax his hips. Early pressure sets a wrestling-heavy tempo that makes Morales think "grappling" rather than striking, opening counter windows and reducing his output.
Once contact is secured, ride the fence for 30–60 seconds per cycle, grinding hips and framing on the head. When Morales explodes up, time mat returns to pull him back down. Layer guillotine and arm-triangle attempts from top position or transitions to keep him defensive and prevent explosive scrambles. Banking 2+ minutes of control per round across three frames is enough for 29-28 or 30-27.
🚀 Michael Morales Key Advantages
Morales stands 6'0" with a 79-inch reach—7 inches longer than Brady's 72. That physical edge allows him to pump out 5.62 significant strikes per minute from outside Brady's pocket range, forcing the wrestler to cover ground under fire. Against Burns and Magny, Morales used his jab to control distance and timed right-hand counters on their entries for early knockdowns.
His long jab is particularly dangerous for stalling wrestle-first fighters. Brady must close 7+ inches to land clean combinations or clinch, and each forward step is a window for Morales to land 1-2s or pull-counters. In a 30-foot cage, that extra distance compounds—Morales can circle away from the fence and reset after stuffing shots, maximizing striking minutes and forcing Brady to work harder for every layer.
Morales' 89% takedown defense is elite, built on explosive first-layer sprawls and strong hip awareness. Against Matthews and Griffin—both with solid wrestling pedigrees—he stuffed early attempts and kept the fight upright for extended periods. His athleticism allows him to snap down on penetrating shots and circle away to open space rather than engaging in prolonged fence battles.
The key is his urgency to disengage: when threatened on the fence, Morales explodes to create separation and returns to kicking range. Against Burns, he denied multiple TD attempts early, frustrating the grappler's rhythm and forcing stand-up exchanges where his power could dictate. If Morales can hold that first-layer defense for 60–90 seconds per round, he keeps Brady in a striking battle where the reach and power advantages swing heavily to him.
Morales is a certified finisher—78% of his 18 wins end inside the distance (14 total), with 72% coming by knockout. His Round 1 dominance is striking: 67% of his victories occur in the opening frame, often via blitzing combinations or timely counters. Against Burns (R1, 3:39 TKO) and Magny (R1, 4:39 TKO), he overwhelmed opponents with volume and power before wrestling adjustments could take hold.
His pull-counter right hand is especially lethal on entries—when opponents shoot or step in, Morales pivots and unloads with hooks and uppercuts that carry genuine finish equity. Brady's only UFC loss came via R2 KO to Belal after failed takedown attempts left him exposed. If Morales catches Brady lunging early, the fight can flip instantly. That explosive first-five-minutes window is where 40% of his win probability lives—before fatigue or accumulated wrestling stress degrades his power.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
If Brady secures 60+ seconds of clinch or top control per round, Morales bleeds minutes without landing offense. His zero submission game means he can't threaten finishes from bottom, and prolonged grappling drains cardio faster than striking exchanges. Three rounds with 2+ minutes of control per frame essentially gifts Brady a 30-27 decision regardless of striking success.
Being pinned to the fence for repeated 30–60 second cycles is devastating—it allows Brady to chain attempts, grind hips, and frame on the head to tax sprawls. Morales' athleticism can create separation, but hesitation or delayed explosions let Brady pull him back down with mat returns. Multiple fence cycles per round compound fatigue and reduce striking output, flipping rounds away from Morales even without clean takedowns.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Use the 79-inch reach to establish the jab early and keep Brady at 7+ inches distance. Pump long 1-2 combinations and circle away after exchanges to reset in open space. When Brady closes distance or shoots, pivot and unload pull-counters with the right hand—these are R1 finish opportunities. Maximize clean striking minutes (3+ per round) to steal rounds on volume and aggression before wrestling tempo builds.
Deny clean hips on Brady's first takedown attempt with explosive sprawls and snap-downs. If he chains to clinch, hand-fight aggressively and explode to the fence within 15–20 seconds—never accept bottom position or prolonged fence control. Use athleticism to circle away immediately after stuffs to return to kicking range. The 89% TDD is only effective if urgency is maintained; hesitation lets Brady bank control minutes and flip rounds.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven 3-round prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics (30 ft)
The 30-foot octagon at UFC 322 provides more real estate for circling and range striking, which theoretically favors Morales' length-driven game. With an extra 5 feet of diameter compared to smaller Apex cages, fighters can reset to open space more easily after scrambles, reducing the cumulative effect of clinch pressure. For a striker with 89% TDD, that space is oxygen—more room to pivot after stuffs and deny wall rides.
However, Brady's fence craft mitigates much of that advantage. Once he closes distance and secures a body lock or under-hooks, the cage size becomes less relevant—he pins opponents to the fence and grinds for 30–60 seconds regardless of octagon diameter. The large cage drops Brady's model win rate from ~65% (smaller cage baseline) to 60%, acknowledging Morales' improved ability to create space. But it doesn't flip the fight—Brady's wrestling volume and mat returns still bank control time over three rounds, especially if he can force 2–3 clinch cycles per round.
🎯Technical Breakdown
The grappling composite gap—Brady's 8.9 versus Morales' 6.1—is the single most decisive metric in this matchup. Brady's 3.62 TD/15 at 54% accuracy versus Morales' minimal offensive wrestling (1.09 TD/15 at 42%) creates a near-3x volume differential that stresses even elite TDD over extended periods. Add Brady's 0.93 submission attempts per 15 minutes (versus Morales' zero), and the grappling threat is multi-dimensional: takedowns, control, and finishes all flow from the same entries.
On the feet, Brady holds edges in strike accuracy (56% vs 49%) and defense (59% vs 53%), which allow him to close distance more safely and absorb less damage per exchange. Morales' higher SLpM (5.62) reflects volume, but his 49% accuracy and 3.31 SApM mean he's trading freely and eating counters. The fight boils down to: can Morales' first-layer TDD and reach deny Brady's entries long enough to land the R1 KO? Or does Brady's chain-wrestling and control time bank two rounds via minute-winning? The model leans 60–40 toward the latter, but Morales' 28% KO equity keeps him live throughout.
🧩Key Battle Areas
1) First 90 seconds of each round: Brady's early takedown layering versus Morales' pull-counters and sprawls defines the tempo. If Brady forces clinch contact in the opening minute, he can bleed 60+ seconds of control and set a wrestling-heavy pace. If Morales stuffs the first two attempts cleanly and lands counters, he seizes striking momentum and forces Brady to shoot from farther distances—increasing KO risk on entries.
2) Fence clinch and mat returns: When Brady secures under-hooks or body locks on the fence, Morales must explode to his feet within 15–20 seconds or risk 60+ seconds of control time per round. Brady's mat return timing—pulling opponents back down mid-scramble—is elite and compounds across rounds. Morales' urgency to disengage is critical; hesitation costs minutes and rounds.
3) Round-end sequences (final 60 seconds): Judges weight late-round action heavily. Brady's cardio (8.2/10) allows sustained pressure into the final minute, often securing a late takedown or clinch to "seal" the round. Morales must preserve energy to circle and counter late, avoiding desperation that invites easy entries. Over three rounds, these closing sequences can swing 2+ rounds if Brady consistently finishes with control.
🏁Final Prediction
This is a classic "minutes vs. moments" fight. Brady wins via accumulated control time, fence work, and occasional submission threats—his path to victory is banking 2+ minutes of grappling per round to secure 29-28 or 30-27 decisions. Morales wins via explosive striking sequences, especially in Round 1 when his power, speed, and TDD are freshest. His 78% finish rate and 67% R1 win distribution show he's built for early blitzes, not grinding wars.
The model allocates 60% to Brady because his clearest edges—grappling volume, defensive stats, and cardio—correlate strongly with three-round decision wins. The large cage trims that from a potential 65% in a smaller octagon, but doesn't erase it. Morales retains 40% because his KO equity (28% of total win probability) is live in every exchange, and a single pull-counter can end the fight before Brady's wrestling compounds. Prediction: Brady by Decision (36% of total outcomes) or Submission (16%), with Morales' best shot being KO in R1 (major chunk of his 28% KO equity). Confidence: 7.5/10—clear technical edges favor Brady, but KO volatility keeps Morales dangerous throughout.
🏅 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Comprehensive value assessment and betting opportunities
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
GOOD VALUE
Model: 40% | Market: N/A
FAIR VALUE
Model: 36% | Market: N/A
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 46% | Market: N/A
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Minute-winning undervalued – Brady’s control time isn’t fully priced.
- • KO volatility overweighted – Morales’ early threat inflates underdog premium.
- • Defense delta – 59% vs 53% striking defense gap underappreciated.
- • TDD context – 89% TDD strong, but Brady’s chain volume stresses first layers.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis (3-Round Fight)
100 hypothetical 3-round fight simulations based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Sean Brady
Primary path via round-banking
Less common, usually late attrition
Live guillotine/arm-triangle threat
💥Outcome Distribution - Michael Morales
Primary finishing lane at range
Wins when he keeps it clean and long
Minimal submission threat historically
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis (3 Round Fight)
⚡Window of Opportunity - Michael Morales
- • First 5 minutes: Highest KO equity before wrestling tempo builds
- • Pull-counters: Punish level changes and rushed entries
- • Keep space: Avoid fence clinch cycles
🎯Progressive Dominance - Sean Brady
- • Minute winning: Clinch/wrestle cycles to bank control
- • Pace control: Wall rides, mat returns to blunt resets
- • Submission threat: Live guillotine/arm-triangle windows
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment (3-Round Fight)
Conviction level: 7.5/10 – minute-winning edge with live KO volatility
Confidence Level
Brady’s wrestling/profile wins minutes; KO volatility persists early
✅Supporting Factors
- • Clear grappling composite edge (8.9 vs 6.1)
- • Higher TD volume with good accuracy (54%)
- • Better strike defense and lower SApM
- • Submission threat to complement control
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Morales’ reach/length and early KO power
- • 89% TDD can deny clean entries if first layer holds
- • Large cage fosters range striking and resets
- • Three-round volatility – fewer minutes to bank
🏁Executive Summary
This three-round welterweight matchup pits Brady’s minute-winning wrestling and control against Morales’ reach-driven KO threat. The large cage trims, but does not erase, Brady’s edge.
Prediction: Brady by Decision or Submission. Live hedge: Morales KO R1.