Flyweight • 3 Rounds

Brandon Royval vs Joshua Van

UFC Men's Flyweight • UFC 317

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Favorite
-125
Royval
Underdog
+105
Van
Brandon Royval
🥊

Brandon Royval

"Raw Dawg"

17-7-0

⭐ Slight Favorite

Age:
32+9 years exp
Height:
5'9"+4" taller
Reach:
68"+3" advantage
Leg Reach:
42"+2" advantage

Fighter Metrics

ELO Rating
1144.7
ELO Peak
1144.7
Total UFC Fights
14
UFC Record
7-3
Current Streak
2 wins
Longest Win Streak
4
Win Rate
64.3%
Avg Fight Duration
2.6 rounds
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Joshua Van
🥊

Joshua Van

14-2-0

⭐ Slight Underdog

Age:
23+9 years exp
Height:
5'5"+4" taller
Reach:
65"+3" advantage
Leg Reach:
40"+2" advantage

Fighter Metrics

ELO Rating
1112.4
ELO Peak
1112.4
Total UFC Fights
8
UFC Record
7-1
Current Streak
4 wins
Longest Win Streak
4
Win Rate
87.5%
Avg Fight Duration
2.9 rounds
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution

Last 5 Fights - Brandon Royval

DateOpponentResultMethod
2024-10-12Tatsuro TairaWDecision - Split (R5, 5:00)
2024-02-24Brandon MorenoWDecision - Split (R5, 5:00)
2023-12-16Alexandre PantojaLDecision - Unanimous (R5, 5:00)
2023-04-15Matheus NicolauWKO/TKO (R1, 2:09)
2022-05-07Matt SchnellWSubmission (R1, 2:14)

Last 5 Fights - Joshua Van

DateOpponentResultMethod
2025-06-07Bruno SilvaWKO/TKO (R3, 4:01)
2025-03-08Rei TsuruyaWDecision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00)
2024-12-07Cody DurdenWDecision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00)
2024-09-14Édgar CháirezWDecision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00)
2024-07-13Charles JohnsonLKO/TKO (R3, 0:20)

Technical Analysis

Technical Score

68/10072/100
Brandon
Joshua
Joshua advantage: 2.9%

Cardio Score

74/10081/100
Brandon
Joshua
Joshua advantage: 4.5%

Overall Rating

71/10076.5/100
Brandon
Joshua
Joshua advantage: 3.7%

Striking Composite

65/10078/100
Brandon
Joshua
Joshua advantage: 9.1%

Grappling Composite

71/10066/100
Brandon
Joshua
Brandon advantage: 3.6%
📊Technical Score Methodology

Royval: 68/100 | Van: 72/100

Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (65 vs 78) and Grappling Composite (71 vs 66). Combines overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.

💪Cardio Score Methodology

Royval: 74/100 | Van: 81/100

Based on average fight duration (Royval: 2.6 rounds vs Van: 2.9 rounds), striking rate per minute (4.46 vs 8.2), takedown rate, and fight finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.

🎯Overall Rating Methodology

Royval: 71.0/100 | Van: 76.5/100

Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance. Both composite scores are weighted equally to balance technical ability with physical attributes.

🥊Striking Composite Analysis

Royval: 65/100 | Van: 78/100

Weighted combination of Significant Strikes per Minute (SLpM), Striking Accuracy (StrAcc), Striking Defense (StrDef), and Strikes Absorbed per Minute. Measures overall striking effectiveness including offensive output, precision, and defensive ability. Van's significant advantage in accuracy (55% vs 40%) drives his superior composite score.

🤼Grappling Composite Analysis

Royval: 71/100 | Van: 66/100

Calculated from Takedowns per 15min (TD15), Takedown Accuracy (TDAcc), Takedown Defense (TDDef), and Submission Attempts per 15min (SubPer15). Evaluates complete grappling game including takedown ability, defensive wrestling, and submission threat. Royval's elite submission rate (1.25/15min) gives him the grappling edge.

Technical Radar Comparison

Metrics Legend
SLpM: Strikes/Min
StrAcc: Strike Accuracy
StrDef: Strike Defense
TD15: Takedowns/15min
TDAcc: TD Accuracy
TDDef: TD Defense
SubPer15: Subs/15min
Brandon Royval
VS
Joshua Van

Detailed Statistical Comparison

Strikes Landed/Min
Advantage:Joshua (+83.9%)
4.46per min8.2per min
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 3.74per min
Striking Accuracy
Advantage:Joshua (+37.5%)
40%55%
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 15.00%
Striking Defense
Advantage:Joshua (+22.9%)
48%59%
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 11.00%
Strikes Absorbed/Min
Advantage:Joshua (+71.9%)
3.06per min5.26per min
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 2.20per min
Takedowns/15min
Advantage:Joshua (+28.0%)
0.75per 15min0.96per 15min
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 0.21per 15min
Takedown Accuracy
Advantage:Brandon (+17.2%)
75%64%
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 11.00%
Takedown Defense
Advantage:Joshua (+80.0%)
45%81%
Brandon
Joshua
Difference: 36.00%
Submissions/15min
Advantage:Brandon (+Infinity%)
1.25per 15min0per 15min
Brandon
Difference: 1.25per 15min

🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown

Comprehensive technical and tactical analysis

🔥 Van Key Advantages

🎯 Striking Volume & Accuracy

Superior Output

8.2 sig strikes/min at 55% accuracy vs Royval's 4.46 at 40%. Van's ability to outland Royval nearly 2:1 while maintaining superior precision gives him a clear path to victory over 15 minutes.

🛡️ Defensive Wrestling

Elite TDD

81% takedown defense neutralizes Royval's best path to victory. Van's ability to keep fights standing plays directly into his striking advantages and high-volume game.

⚡ Youth & Momentum

4-Fight Win Streak

At 23 with a 4-fight win streak, Van is entering his prime while improving with each performance. His wins over Durden and Silva show increasing confidence and finishing ability.

⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios

🤼Grappling Exchanges

Royval's submission threat and grappling experience could overwhelm Van in scrambles

🎭Pressure & Experience

Royval's championship experience and pressure fighting could expose Van's relatively limited UFC exposure

📋 Likely Gameplan

📐Distance Control

Maintain distance with superior footwork and use elite takedown defense to avoid grappling

🎯Volume Striking

Overwhelm with superior striking volume and accuracy to accumulate damage over 15 minutes

⭐ Royval Key Advantages

🤼 Submission Threat

Elite Ground Game

1.25 submission attempts per 15 minutes with 3 UFC submission wins. His guillotine against Schnell and opportunistic submissions create constant danger whenever fights hit the ground.

👑 Elite Competition Experience

Title Fight Veteran

Recent wins over Moreno and Taira prove Royval can rise to elite level. His championship experience and pressure fighting could overwhelm Van's relatively limited UFC exposure.

📏 Physical Advantages

Size & Reach

4" height and 3" reach advantages provide natural distance control and leverage. These physical advantages become magnified in scrambles and clinch exchanges.

⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios

📏Distance Fighting

Van's superior striking volume and elite takedown defense could keep Royval at disadvantageous range

🌊Volume Pressure

Van's 84% higher striking output could overwhelm and accumulate damage over 15 minutes

📋 Likely Gameplan

🚀Pressure & Scrambles

Close distance aggressively and force scrambles where his submission threat becomes dangerous

Early Submission Hunt

Press for early submission opportunities before Van can establish striking rhythm and distance control

💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market

Detailed value assessment in the betting market

📊Market Odds

Joshua Van-122
Implied Probability: 55.0%
Brandon Royval+102
Implied Probability: 49.5%
Market Props
Over 2.5 rounds:-225 (69.2%)
Under 2.5 rounds:+185 (35.1%)
Goes the distance:-190 (65.5%)
Doesn't go distance:+155 (39.2%)

🤖Analytical Model

Joshua Van-165
Model Probability: 62%
Brandon Royval+140
Model Probability: 38%
Model Props
Over 2.5 rounds:-160 (61.5%)
Under 2.5 rounds:+130 (43.5%)
Goes the distance:-120 (54.5%)
Doesn't go distance:-110 (52.4%)

💎Value Opportunities

⭐⭐⭐
MAXIMUM VALUE
Van Moneyline (-122)

Model: 62% | Market: 55%

MODEL EDGE:
+7%
⭐⭐
GOOD VALUE
Van by Decision (+145)

Model: 50% | Market: ~40.8%

PROBABILITY:
50%
AVOID
Over 2.5 Rounds (-225)

Model: 61.5% | Market: 69.2%

OVERPRICED:
-7.7%
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
  • Undervalues Van's striking dominance - 84% volume advantage not reflected in odds
  • Overvalues Royval's submission threat - Market fixated on grappling despite TDD disparity
  • Distance betting mispriced - Over 2.5 rounds heavily overpriced at -225
  • Method props undervalued - Van by decision offers excellent value at +145

🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis

100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data

62%
Joshua Van Win Probability
Favored based on technical striking dominance
38%
Brandon Royval Win Probability
Strong chance via submission threat

🏆Outcome Distribution - Van

By Decision50%

Superior volume + accuracy dominance

By KO/TKO12%

Accumulating damage through volume

By Submission0%

No historical submission threat

💥Outcome Distribution - Royval

By Submission18%

Elite submission threat in scrambles

By Decision10%

Less likely due to striking disadvantage

By KO/TKO10%

Opportunistic power in exchanges

Fight Timeline Analysis

R1
Advantage: Royval
Early submission threat, fresh grappling energy
R2
Advantage: Even
Van's volume starts building, Royval adjusts
R3
Advantage: Van
Volume accumulation + cardio dominance
Window of Opportunity - Royval
  • First 10 minutes: Maximum submission danger before striking volume takes over
  • Scramble situations: Elite opportunistic grappling (1.25 subs/15min)
  • Pressure phases: Force clinch work and takedown attempts
  • Van's defensive lapses: Capitalize on striking defense gaps (59%)
  • Early aggression: Disrupt Van's rhythm before volume builds
🎯Progressive Dominance - Van
  • Volume supremacy: 84% striking advantage (8.2 vs 4.46/min) accumulates
  • Distance control: Use footwork and timing to avoid grappling
  • Defensive wrestling: Elite 81% TDD vs Royval's 75% TDA
  • Accuracy advantage: 55% vs 40% creates consistent damage
  • Late round cardio: Youth advantage at 23 vs 32 years old
📊Round-by-Round Probability Breakdown
Round 1
Royval 55% | Van 45%
Grappling threat favors Raw Dawg
Round 2
Van 60% | Royval 40%
Volume starts controlling pace
Round 3
Van 75% | Royval 25%
Cardio and accuracy dominance

🎯 Final Confidence Assessment

Confidence level and uncertainty factors

7/10

Confidence Level

High confidence based on Van's quantifiable statistical dominance

Supporting Factors

  • • Massive striking volume advantage (84% higher output)
  • • Superior accuracy creating consistent damage (55% vs 40%)
  • • Elite takedown defense neutralizes primary threat (81%)
  • • Youth and physical prime advantage (23 vs 32)
  • • Market inefficiency offers exceptional value (-122 vs -165)
  • • Statistical composite scores favor Van decisively

⚠️Risk Factors

  • • Royval's elite submission threat (1.25 attempts/15min)
  • • Van's relatively limited UFC sample size
  • • Scrambles and transitions favor Raw Dawg's experience
  • • Flyweight division's inherent volatility
  • • Single submission attempt can end fight instantly
  • • Royval's championship-level opposition experience

🏁Executive Summary

This flyweight contender clash represents a textbook striker vs grappler dynamic, with Van's technical striking dominance creating the most compelling statistical narrative. The numbers tell a decisive story: Van's 84% striking volume advantage (8.2 vs 4.46/min), superior accuracy (55% vs 40%), and elite takedown defense (81%) form an almost impenetrable foundation for victory.

The betting market appears to significantly undervalue Van's advantages, creating exceptional value at -122 when our analytical model suggests fair odds closer to -165. The market's 55% implied probability for Van substantially underestimates his 62% true probability, representing a 7% edge that translates to significant long-term value for informed bettors.

While Royval's submission threat (1.25 attempts per 15 minutes) remains the primary risk factor, Van's takedown defense statistics suggest this threat is significantly mitigated. The age gap (23 vs 32) and Van's composite striking score advantage (78 vs 65) provide additional layers of confidence in the prediction.

Final Prediction: Van's technical superiority, youth advantage, and defensive wrestling prove decisive over 15 minutes. While Royval creates early submission danger, Van's relentless striking volume and superior accuracy accumulate decisive advantages, leading to a clear unanimous decision victory after controlling the majority of exchanges through superior speed, timing, and output.

💰Recommended Betting Strategy

Primary Bet
Van Moneyline (-122)
3-4% of bankroll
Value Play
Van by Decision (+145)
1-2% of bankroll
Avoid
Over 2.5 Rounds (-225)
Overpriced by market
Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.