Abdul-Kareem Al-Selwady vs Matheus Camilo
Men's Lightweight Bout • UFC Abu Dhabi
Saturday, October 25, 2025

Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Last 5 Fights - Abdul-Kareem Al-Selwady
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-02 | Loik Radzhabov | L | KO/TKO - Punches (R3, 0:49) |
2023-08-15 | George Hardwick | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2023-02-17 | Mike Murphy | W | Decision - Unanimous (R5, 5:00) |
2022-09-23 | Chris Pecero | W | KO/TKO - Punches (R1, 2:44) |
2022-02-27 | Nick Compton | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
Last 5 Fights - Matheus Camilo
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2025-05-17 | Gabe Green | L | Submission - Rear Naked Choke (R2, 3:43) |
2024-12-14 | Dorobshokh Nabotov | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2024-10-11 | Jhonasky Sojo | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2023-09-17 | Dorian Ramos | W | Submission - Triangle Armbar (R3, 2:43) |
2023-05-06 | Alberto Romo | W | KO/TKO - Punches (R1, 4:43) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Matheus Camilo advantage: 35.1%Cardio Score
Abdul-Kareem Al-Selwady advantage: 11.5%Overall Rating
Matheus Camilo advantage: 7.4%📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (51 vs 51) and Grappling Composite (24 vs 48). Shows skill balance across the main phases.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Reflects sustained output and endurance.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill and conditioning.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Matheus Camilo advantage: 100.0%🥊 Striking Composite
Weighted combination of SLpM, StrAcc, StrDef, and Strikes Absorbed per Minute. Captures offensive efficiency and defensive responsibility.
🤼 Grappling Composite
Based on TD/15, TDAcc, TDDef, and Sub/15. Higher values indicate superior wrestling and submission threat.
Technical Radar Comparison
Metrics Legend
Detailed Statistical Comparison
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven 3-round prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Range & Cage Dynamics
In the 30-foot cage, Al-Selwady can maximize movement and volume, but Camilo's clinch entries and chain wrestling limit prolonged space.
🎯Technical Breakdown
Striking is essentially even by composite, but Camilo's grappling metrics (TDAcc 66% vs TDDef 20%) forecast top control and submission lanes.
🧩Key Battle Areas
First-layer TDD from Al-Selwady, re-shots from Camilo, and defensive responsibility in exits will determine whether minutes are won on feet or mat.
🏅 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Comprehensive value assessment and betting opportunities
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
GOOD VALUE
Model: 30% | Market: N/A
FAIR VALUE
Model: 30% | Market: N/A
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 15% | Market: N/A
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis (3-Round Fight)
100 hypothetical fight simulations based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Matheus Camilo
Top control and damage accumulation
Ground-and-pound stoppage lanes
Back-takes and chokes after takedowns
💥Outcome Distribution - Abdul-Kareem Al-Selwady
Counter entries and flurries on breaks
Out-volume if TDD holds long enough
Limited recorded submission threat
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis (3 Round Fight)
⚡Window of Opportunity - Abdul-Kareem Al-Selwady
- • Counter entries as Camilo changes levels
- • Target legs early to slow shots
- • Circle off fence to deny clinch control
🎯Progressive Dominance - Matheus Camilo
- • Chain wrestle into rides and mat returns
- • Threaten back takes to open strikes
- • Keep positional control to bank minutes
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment (3-Round Fight)
Conviction level: 8/10 — Grappling differential drives a clear edge
Confidence Level
Strong stylistic advantage for Camilo on the mat
✅Supporting Factors
- • TDAcc 66% vs TDDef 20% mismatch
- • Sub attempts 1.7/15 vs 0.0/15
- • Efficient striking defense (SApM 1.38)
- • Youth and cardio profile over 3 rounds
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Al-Selwady's KO power and volume surges
- • Camilo's past submission losses in scrambles
- • Big cage can delay clinch entries
- • Lightweight volatility in exchanges
🏁Executive Summary
Camilo holds decisive grappling advantages that are well-aligned to exploit Al-Selwady's takedown defense gap. While striking exchanges are competitive, the control, submission, and ride time threat push the bout toward Camilo in most simulations.
Prediction: Camilo by Decision or Submission; Al-Selwady KO as live hedge.