Ikram Aliskerov vs Jun Yong Park
Men's Middleweight Bout • UFC Abu Dhabi
Saturday, October 25, 2025

Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Last 5 Fights - Ikram Aliskerov
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2025-04-26 | Andre Muniz | W | TKO (punches) (R1, 4:54) |
2024-06-22 | Robert Whittaker | L | KO (punch) (R1, 1:49) |
2023-10-21 | Warlley Alves | W | KO (punches) (R1, 2:07) |
2023-05-06 | Phil Hawes | W | KO (punches) (R1, 2:10) |
2022-09-13 | Mario Sousa | W | Submission (Jaw Crank) (R1, 2:23) |
Last 5 Fights - Jun Yong Park
Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
---|---|---|---|
2025-06-21 | Ismail Naurdiev | W | Decision - Unanimous (R3, 5:00) |
2024-10-12 | Brad Tavares | W | Decision - Split (R3, 5:00) |
2023-12-09 | Andre Muniz | L | Decision - Split (R3, 5:00) |
2023-07-15 | Albert Duraev | W | Submission - Rear Naked Choke (R2, 4:45) |
2023-02-04 | Denis Tiuliulin | W | Submission - Rear Naked Choke (R1, 4:05) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Ikram Aliskerov advantage: 6.7%Cardio Score
Jun Yong Park advantage: 38.5%Overall Rating
Jun Yong Park advantage: 13.8%📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (85 vs 70) and Grappling Composite (75 vs 80). Reflects combined offensive and defensive technique.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and fight finish rate. Park sustains higher pace over three rounds.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with conditioning.
Striking Composite
Ikram Aliskerov advantage: 21.4%Grappling Composite
Jun Yong Park advantage: 6.7%Technical Radar Comparison
Metrics Legend
Detailed Statistical Comparison
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven 3-round prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Range & Cage Dynamics
Large cage favors Aliskerov's length and distance weapons early; Park's entries are best in clinch but face elite 100% takedown defense.
🎯Technical Breakdown
Aliskerov owns output and accuracy edges (7.76 SLpM, 62% acc) with KO power; Park balances defense and grappling volume (1.87 TD/15, 43% acc) and can wear down late.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Early survivability for Park vs. early KO lanes for Aliskerov. If extended, Park's cardio and clinch pressure can bank minutes.
🏁Final Prediction
Minutes favor Park over time; moments favor Aliskerov early. Projection: Aliskerov finds a finish or edges rounds 1–2; Park's best path is decisions via pace.
🏅 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Comprehensive value assessment and betting opportunities
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
GOOD VALUE
Model: 40% | Market: N/A
FAIR VALUE
Model: 15% | Market: N/A
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 60% | Market: N/A
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Early KO equity – Aliskerov's power often underpriced vs durable opponents.
- • Elite TDD impact – 100% defense reduces Park's best path; not always fully priced.
- • Cardio variance – Late rounds volatile if pace spikes; totals sensitive.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis (3-Round Fight)
100 hypothetical fight simulations based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Aliskerov
Power striking lanes early
Transitions after knockdowns
Minutes banked if tempered pace
💥Outcome Distribution - Park
Pace and pressure late
Counter exchanges
Clinches and mat control
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis (3 Round Fight)
⚡Window of Opportunity - Aliskerov
- • First 5 minutes: Peak KO equity before Park settles.
- • Counter entries: Meet level changes with uppercuts.
- • Maintain range: Long jab and kicks to manage distance.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Park
- • Minute winning: Jabs and clinch grind bank points.
- • Pace control: Push fence clinches, mix takedown attempts.
- • Defense first: Avoid early exchanges; deny counters.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment (3-Round Fight)
Conviction level: 8/10 — Early power vs late cardio dynamic
Confidence Level
Aliskerov edges overall via striking power and TDD.
✅Supporting Factors
- • Higher SLpM with superior accuracy (7.76 @ 62%)
- • 100% takedown defense vs Park's TD entries
- • Reach advantage (+3") in a large cage
- • KO power validated across recent wins
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Park's cardio advantage over extended exchanges
- • Clinch control and fence time from Park
- • Aliskerov's defensive hittability in exchanges
- • Middleweight volatility
🏁Executive Summary
Aliskerov owns early striking momentum and elite takedown defense; Park carries cardio and clinch leverage late. Over three rounds, the model leans 70–30 toward Aliskerov.
Prediction: Aliskerov by KO/TKO or Decision. Park live by Decision if he survives R1 and controls pace.