Exclusive UFC Offer: Join BetOnline through our link and unlock up to $250 in free bets + 100 free spins. BetOnline delivers the earliest and fairest UFC/MMA odds in the market, giving you the competitive edge you need. Start winning today with exclusive access to live betting, mobile apps, 24/7 support, and VIP rewards program!
⚡ LIMITED TIME! Accepts Cryptocurrency. Register now before this exclusive offer expires!
Please gamble responsibly.
BetOnline UFC – Promotional Offer
Featherweight Bout • 3 Rounds

Cub Swanson vs Nate Landwehr

Men's Featherweight Bout • UFC 327

Saturday, April 11, 2026 • Kaseya Center, Miami, FL • 30ft Octagon (Large Cage)

Fighter • Odds source: BetOnline
...
Muay Thai Veteran
Fighter • Odds source: BetOnline
...
High-Volume Brawler
Cub Swanson vs Nate Landwehr - UFC 327

Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles

Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.

Cub Swanson

Cub Swanson

"Killer Cub"

30-14-0

🥋 Muay Thai Veteran

Age:
41Veteran
Height:
5'8"Shorter
Reach:
70"-2" disadvantage
Leg Reach:
39"Shorter

Cub Swanson

Fighter Metrics

Total UFC Fights
24
UFC Record
18-6
Current Streak
1 win
Win Rate
68.2%
Finish Rate
60%
Avg Fight Duration
11:30
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Nate Landwehr

Nate Landwehr

"The Train"

18-7-0

🥊 High-Volume Brawler

Age:
37Veteran
Height:
5'9"Taller
Reach:
72"+2" advantage
Leg Reach:
40"Longer

Nate Landwehr

Fighter Metrics

Total UFC Fights
12
UFC Record
7-5
Current Streak
2 losses
Win Rate
72%
Finish Rate
61.1%
Avg Fight Duration
8:45
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution

Last 5 Fights - Cub Swanson

DateOpponentResultMethod
Dec 14, 2024
UFC Fight Night
Billy Quarantillo (29-14, 18-6 UFC)
Fight #39 in UFC
W
TKO - Right Cross
R3 · 1:36
Jun 29, 2024
UFC 303: Pereira vs. Procházka 2
Andre Fili (29-13, 23-11 UFC)
Fight #37 in UFC
L
Decision - Split
R3 · 5:00
Aug 12, 2023
UFC Fight Night
Hakeem Dawodu (28-13, 13-3-1 UFC)
Fight #32 in UFC
W
Decision - Unanimous
R3 · 5:00
Oct 15, 2022
UFC Fight Night
Jonathan Martinez (28-12, 16-4 UFC)
Fight #30 in UFC
L
TKO - Leg Kicks
R2 · 4:19
Dec 18, 2021
UFC Fight Night
Darren Elkins (27-12, 26-9 UFC)
Fight #31 in UFC
W
TKO - Punches & Wheel Kick
R1 · 2:12

Last 5 Fights - Nate Landwehr

DateOpponentResultMethod
Jul 12, 2025
UFC Fight Night
Morgan Charrière (18-6, 20-11-1 UFC)
Fight #47 in UFC
L
TKO - Punches
R3 · 0:27
Dec 7, 2024
UFC 310: Pantoja vs. Asakura
Doo Ho Choi (18-5, 15-4-1 UFC)
Fight #31 in UFC
L
TKO - Elbows From Crucifix
R3 · 3:21
Mar 30, 2024
UFC Fight Night
Jamall Emmers (17-5, 20-7 UFC)
Fight #47 in UFC
W
TKO - Uppercut, Right Hook, & Hammerfists
R1 · 4:43
Jun 10, 2023
UFC 289: Nunes vs. Aldana
Dan Ige (17-4, 16-6 UFC)
Fight #12 in UFC
L
Decision - Unanimous
R3 · 5:00
Mar 25, 2023
UFC Fight Night
Austin Lingo (16-4, 9-1 UFC)
Fight #65 in UFC
W
SUB - Rear Naked Choke
R2 · 4:11

Technical Analysis

Technical Score

57/10053/100
Cub
Nate
Cub +3.6%

Cardio Score

68/10055/100
Cub
Nate
Cub +10.6%

Overall Rating

62.5/10054/100
Cub
Nate
Cub +7.3%
Technical Score

Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (65.0 vs 55.0) and Grappling Composite (48.0 vs 50.0). Balances overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.

Cardio Score

Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.

Overall Rating

Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.

Striking Composite

65/10055/100
Cub
Nate
Cub +8.3%

Grappling Composite

48/10050/100
Cub
Nate
Nate +2.0%

Technical Radar Comparison

Metrics Legend
SLpM: Strikes/Min
StrAcc: Strike Accuracy
StrDef: Strike Defense
TD15: Takedowns/15min
TDAcc: TD Accuracy
TDDef: TD Defense
SubPer15: Subs/15min
Cub Swanson
VS
Nate Landwehr

Detailed Statistical Comparison

Strikes Landed/Min
Advantage:Nate (+17.5%)
4.79per min5.63per min
Cub
Nate
Difference: 0.84per min
Striking Accuracy
Advantage:Cub (+10.9%)
51%46%
Cub
Nate
Difference: 5.00%
Striking Defense
Advantage:Cub (+13.5%)
59%52%
Cub
Nate
Difference: 7.00%
Strikes Absorbed/Min
Advantage:Nate (+45.8%)
4per min5.83per min
Cub
Nate
Difference: 1.83per min
Takedowns/15min
Advantage:Cub (+32.9%)
1.01per 15min0.76per 15min
Cub
Nate
Difference: 0.25per 15min
Takedown Accuracy
Advantage:Cub (+19.0%)
50%42%
Cub
Nate
Difference: 8.00%
Takedown Defense
Advantage:Nate (+12.5%)
64%72%
Cub
Nate
Difference: 8.00%
Submissions/15min
Advantage:Nate (+94.9%)
0.39per 15min0.76per 15min
Cub
Nate
Difference: 0.37per 15min

Fight Analysis Breakdown

Cub Swanson Key Advantages

🥋Technical Precision
+5% accuracy

Swanson's 51% striking accuracy vs Landwehr's 46% reflects his refined Muay Thai technique developed over 30 professional fights. His ability to pick shots rather than throw volume creates cleaner scoring sequences that judges reward. The 24 UFC bouts of experience allow Swanson to read opponents' patterns and time counter shots with precision that raw aggression cannot match. His diverse arsenal—elbows, spinning backfists, body kicks—keeps opponents guessing and creates openings that pure volume fighters struggle to find.

🛡️Defensive Efficiency
-1.83 SApM delta

The 1.83 strikes absorbed per minute differential (4.00 vs 5.83) reveals a significant damage economy gap. Swanson's 59% striking defense vs Landwehr's 52% means he avoids more incoming fire while landing at a higher rate. In a three-round fight, this translates to Swanson taking roughly 27 fewer significant strikes over 15 minutes. His head movement and footwork, honed through years of elite competition, allow him to slip exchanges that Landwehr walks through. This defensive advantage becomes critical when both fighters are trading in the pocket.

🏋️Experience & Composure
44 pro fights

With 44 professional fights and 24 UFC bouts, Swanson brings an unmatched wealth of experience to this matchup. He has faced and defeated elite featherweights throughout his career, developing the ability to adapt mid-fight and find solutions under pressure. His 68% career win rate with a 60% finish rate shows he can close fights when opportunities present themselves. Against a brawler like Landwehr, Swanson's veteran composure allows him to weather early storms and capitalize on openings as the fight progresses.

🎭Diverse Arsenal & Finish Variety
3 finish methods

Swanson's finish portfolio—14 KO/TKOs, 12 decisions, and 4 submissions—demonstrates tactical versatility that keeps opponents guessing. His Muay Thai background provides elbows, knees, spinning attacks, and clinch control, while his submission threat (4 career subs including guillotines and rear-naked chokes) means Landwehr cannot simply shoot desperate takedowns when hurt. This finish diversity becomes crucial in close fights: Swanson can adapt to opportunities rather than forcing a singular path to victory. His recent Quarantillo TKO (right cross) showed he still possesses one-shot power when timing aligns.

Unfavorable Scenarios

💥Volume Overwhelm

Landwehr's 5.63 SLpM output could overwhelm Swanson if the fight becomes a sustained firefight. When Landwehr builds momentum with combinations and forward pressure, even experienced fighters struggle to maintain composure. At 41 years old, Swanson's reflexes may not recover as quickly from heavy exchanges, and Landwehr's relentless pace could expose age-related durability concerns.

🎯Durability Concerns

Swanson has been stopped 5 times by KO/TKO in his career, and at 41, chin durability becomes a legitimate concern. Landwehr's willingness to trade and throw power shots from unorthodox angles could find openings that younger fighters might defend. Swanson's recent TKO loss to Jonathan Martinez shows he remains vulnerable to power strikers who can find clean shots.

Likely Gameplan

🔗Counter-Striking & Timing

Swanson should look to time Landwehr's aggressive entries with counter elbows and check hooks. His Muay Thai background provides the tools to punish forward pressure—clinch knees, sweep kicks, and stepping elbows become highly effective against a fighter who charges in recklessly. By making Landwehr pay for every blitz, Swanson can gradually discourage the volume approach and force a more measured fight that favors his technical edge.

⛓️Body Work & Pace Control

Investing in body shots early can drain Landwehr's cardio and slow his volume output as the fight progresses. Swanson's Muay Thai body kicks and liver shots are proven weapons that can sap an opponent's gas tank. By controlling the pace and forcing Landwehr to fight at a measured tempo rather than his preferred chaotic pace, Swanson can leverage his superior cardio score (68 vs 55) into a decisive late-fight advantage.

Nate Landwehr Key Advantages

Volume & Pressure
+0.84 SLpM

Landwehr's 5.63 SLpM output creates relentless forward pressure that can overwhelm opponents who prefer measured exchanges. His "The Train" nickname reflects his fighting style—constant forward motion with combinations thrown from multiple angles. This volume approach is particularly effective against aging fighters whose defensive reactions may have slowed. Landwehr's ability to sustain high output in the early rounds creates scoring windows that can build insurmountable leads before his opponent can establish rhythm.

📏Physical Advantages
+2" reach

Landwehr's 72-inch reach advantage over Swanson's 70 inches, combined with his 5'9" height vs Swanson's 5'8", creates physical advantages that force Swanson to close distance before engaging effectively. His longer limbs allow him to initiate from range where Swanson's counters are less dangerous. Additionally, Landwehr's 72% takedown defense significantly exceeds Swanson's 64%, meaning he is better at keeping the fight in his preferred standing range where his volume advantage is maximized.

🔥Finish Rate & Momentum Potential
61.1% finishes

Landwehr's 61.1% career finish rate (11 of 18 wins) demonstrates genuine finishing ability when he finds his rhythm. His 9 KO/TKO victories include spectacular stoppages like the Emmers destruction (uppercut-hook-hammerfist combo at 4:43 R1) that show his ability to chain attacks when opponents are hurt. This finishing instinct becomes critical against a 41-year-old opponent whose recovery between exchanges may be diminished. When Landwehr smells blood, his relentless follow-up prevents opponents from surviving to the bell—a trait that can turn competitive rounds into decisive finishes. His submission threat (2 career subs including a rear-naked choke over Austin Lingo) adds another dimension if the fight hits the ground.

Unfavorable Scenarios

🥋Technical Counter-Fighting

If Swanson establishes a counter-fighting rhythm, Landwehr's aggressive entries become liabilities rather than assets. Swanson's Muay Thai timing can turn every forward surge into a scoring opportunity for the veteran—elbows in the pocket, clinch knees on entries, and check hooks as Landwehr overcommits. The 51% vs 46% accuracy gap compounds when Landwehr is walking into clean shots while throwing volume that fails to land cleanly.

🪫Cardio Fade & Damage Accumulation

Landwehr's 5.83 SApM absorption rate is among the highest in the featherweight division. His willingness to eat shots while pressing forward means he accumulates damage rapidly, and his recent back-to-back TKO losses to Charriere and Choi suggest durability may be declining. Combined with an average fight duration of 8:45, Landwehr's pace appears unsustainable over three full rounds against a fighter who can weather the early storm and capitalize on fatigue.

Likely Gameplan

🚂Relentless Forward Pressure

Landwehr's best strategy is to maintain relentless forward pressure from the opening bell, overwhelming Swanson with volume before the veteran can establish timing. By throwing combinations in bunches and varying levels, Landwehr can prevent Swanson from setting up counter shots. The key is maintaining constant output without pausing to let Swanson reset—every stoppage in action benefits the more technical fighter.

⏱️Early Blitz & Finish

Landwehr's best chance for victory lies in securing an early stoppage, ideally in Round 1 when his energy and output are at their peak. His 7 first-round finishes from 18 wins show he is most dangerous when fresh and aggressive. Against a 41-year-old opponent with known durability concerns, early power shots and swarming combinations could force a stoppage before Swanson's experience and technical advantages can take effect.

Fight Prediction Analysis

Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis

52%
Cub Swanson Win Probability
Technical precision and defensive efficiency edge
48%
Nate Landwehr Win Probability
Volume pressure and early finish potential

📊Detailed Analysis Summary

🏟️Cage Dynamics

The 30-foot octagon at Kaseya Center creates a dynamic that could benefit both fighters in different ways. Landwehr's forward pressure and volume striking benefit from the space to build momentum on entries, while Swanson's counter- fighting style gains additional time to read and react to incoming attacks. The larger cage slightly favors the more technical fighter who can use footwork to maintain optimal range, though Landwehr's ability to cut off the cage with relentless pressure can negate this advantage if he maintains his pace.

🎯Technical Breakdown

This matchup pits precision against volume. Swanson's 51% accuracy and 59% defense create a cleaner damage profile, while Landwehr's 5.63 SLpM output generates raw volume that can overwhelm. The critical stat is absorption: Landwehr takes 5.83 strikes per minute vs Swanson's 4.00, meaning Landwehr absorbs 45.8% more damage per minute of fighting. In a three-round fight, this differential translates to roughly 27 additional significant strikes absorbed. The question is whether Landwehr's volume advantage (0.84 SLpM edge) can overcome Swanson's efficiency before the damage accumulation becomes decisive.

🧩Key Battle Areas

Three critical battle areas will determine the outcome: pace control in Round 1, damage accumulation through the middle rounds, and durability under fire. If Landwehr can establish his chaotic pace early and land power shots, his finish potential becomes the dominant factor. If Swanson can weather the initial storm and begin timing counters, the fight shifts toward a technical contest where his experience and accuracy become decisive. The takedown battle could be a wild card—Swanson's 1.01 TD15 and 50% accuracy give him an option to change levels, though Landwehr's 72% TDDef makes this a risky path.

🥊Stylistic Matchup Analysis

This classic striker vs brawler dynamic creates fascinating style contrasts. Swanson's Muay Thai background emphasizes clinch control, elbows, and counter timing—techniques that historically excel against aggressive forward pressure. Landwehr's "Train" persona reflects pure volume-based chaos, throwing combinations in bunches without regard for defensive positioning. The featherweight division history shows technical counterpunchers like Max Holloway and Alexander Volkanovski dominating volume strikers who lack defensive polish. Swanson's 24 UFC fights have exposed him to every variation of this matchup, while Landwehr's 12 UFC appearances suggest he's still learning to adjust mid-fight against crafty veterans. The age gap (41 vs 37) matters less than the experience gap—Swanson has seen 44 professional opponents compared to Landwehr's 25, a 76% increase in opponent variety.

⚔️Recent Form Trajectory

Analyzing recent performances reveals contrasting momentum patterns. Swanson enters on a 1-fight win streak after TKO'ing Billy Quarantillo in December 2024 with a perfectly timed right cross in Round 3—demonstrating his timing remains sharp at 41. His previous split decision loss to Andre Fili was competitive, showing Swanson can still hang with ranked competition. Landwehr, conversely, enters on a brutal 2-fight losing streak with back-to-back TKO losses: Charrière stopped him with punches at 0:27 of R3, then Doo Ho Choi finished him with elbows from crucifix at 3:21 of R3. Both finishes came late in Round 3, suggesting serious durability and cardio concerns. Landwehr's body may be showing accumulated damage from his high-absorption fighting style (5.83 SApM over 12 UFC fights = approximately 2,100 significant strikes absorbed in UFC alone).

🏁Final Prediction

This is a razor-thin matchup between a technical veteran and a volume brawler. The most likely outcome is Cub Swanson by KO/TKO (22% probability) via counter strikes that catch Landwehr pressing forward recklessly, or by Decision (20%) if Swanson can outpoint Landwehr with cleaner, more accurate striking. Landwehr's primary path is by KO/TKO (28%) through early volume overwhelming Swanson before the veteran can establish rhythm. His decision path (15%) requires maintaining output for three full rounds—a pace his 8:45 average fight duration suggests he struggles to sustain. The 52-48 split reflects genuine uncertainty: Swanson's technical edge and recent TKO victory suggest he's still dangerous, but Landwehr's aggressive style can create chaos that neutralizes skill advantages. The key variable is whether Landwehr's recent stoppage losses indicate permanent decline or were simply matchup-specific vulnerabilities.

Betting Analysis: Model vs Market

Detailed value assessment in the betting market

📊Market Odds

Implied Probability: N/A
Implied Probability: N/A

🤖Analytical Model

Cub Swanson-108
Model Probability: 52%
Nate Landwehr+108
Model Probability: 48%

💎Value Opportunities

⭐⭐⭐
BEST VALUE
Swanson by KO/TKO (+250)

Model: 22% | Fair: +354

PROBABILITY:
22%
⭐⭐
GOOD VALUE
Fight Doesn't Go Distance (-130)

Model: 65% | Fair: -186

FINISH RATE:
65%
SLIGHT VALUE
Landwehr by KO/TKO R1 (+400)

Model: 15% | Fair: +567

EARLY KO EQUITY:
15%
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
  • Near coin-flip fight – Model sees this as 52/48, making large line movements exploitable.
  • Undervalues counter-striking – Swanson's Muay Thai timing vs reckless entries often produces finishes.
  • Losing streak discount – Landwehr's 2 TKO losses may be overweighted by market.

Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis

100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data

🏆Outcome Distribution - Cub Swanson

By KO/TKO22%

Counter elbows and check hooks vs forward pressure

By Decision20%

Outpointing with accuracy and defense over 3 rounds

By Submission10%

Guillotine or choke if Landwehr shoots recklessly

💥Outcome Distribution - Nate Landwehr

By KO/TKO28%

Best path via early volume and power combinations

By Decision15%

Requires maintaining volume output for 15 minutes

By Submission5%

Guillotine choke opportunistically

Fight Timeline Analysis

R1
Advantage: Landwehr
Peak volume + fresh energy
R2
Advantage: Even
Experience vs momentum
R3
Advantage: Swanson
Cardio edge + accumulated reads
Window of Opportunity - Nate Landwehr
  • First 5-7 minutes: Highest KO equity when fresh and aggressive. Landwehr's round distribution shows 7 of his 18 wins came in Round 1, a 38.9% R1 finish rate that ranks among the division's most explosive starts. His TKO of Jamall Emmers (uppercut, right hook, hammerfists at 4:43 of R1) exemplifies this early blitz strategy.
  • Volume blitz: Sustained combos to overwhelm aging reflexes. At 5.63 SLpM, Landwehr throws approximately 28 significant strikes per round. Against a 41-year-old opponent, this pace aims to force defensive errors before Swanson can establish counter rhythm. The key is throwing combinations without pausing—every reset allows the veteran to recalibrate.
  • Power shots: Target chin durability with overhand rights. Swanson's 5 career KO/TKO losses show vulnerability to power strikers. Jonathan Martinez's leg-kick TKO at 4:19 of R2 in 2022 revealed accumulated wear. Landwehr must mix body-head combinations to set up his finishing shots, using the threat of body attacks to lower Swanson's guard before uncorking overhands.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Cub Swanson
  • Counter timing: Read patterns and punish entries with precision. Swanson's 30-fight career has exposed him to every aggressive style variant. His Quarantillo win (right cross TKO at 1:36 of R3) showed he can time finishes when opponents overcommit. Against Landwehr's predictable forward charges, Swanson should employ check hooks, stepping elbows, and clinch knees to make aggression costly.
  • Body investment: Drain cardio with liver kicks and knees. Muay Thai body attacks are particularly effective against high-volume fighters who prioritize output over defensive positioning. Each clean liver kick or body knee saps Landwehr's ability to sustain his pace. Swanson's 68 cardio score vs Landwehr's 55 suggests the veteran can maintain body attack frequency deeper into rounds.
  • Late rounds: Technical superiority shines as pace drops. Swanson's round distribution shows 16 of his 30 wins went to Round 3, a 53.3% rate that demonstrates championship cardio. His unanimous decision over Hakeem Dawodu showcased his ability to win close rounds with cleaner, more efficient striking. If Swanson survives the early storm, Round 3 becomes his ideal environment—tired opponent, accumulated reads, technical edge.
📈Momentum Shifts & Critical Moments

Round 1 (0:00-2:30): Landwehr establishes pace with volume, Swanson absorbs pressure and looks for timing. First 2.5 minutes critical—if Swanson survives without major damage, his counter game activates.

Round 2 (5:00-10:00): Pivotal round where Landwehr's cardio begins to wane while Swanson's reads improve. Body work from Round 1 compounds here. Landwehr must maintain aggression despite fatigue; Swanson must avoid desperation exchanges that favor chaos over technique.

Round 3 (10:00-15:00): Championship round favors cardio and durability. Both fighters have R3 vulnerabilities: Swanson (age-related recovery) vs Landwehr (recent R3 stoppages). First to impose their pace wins—Swanson's measured striking vs Landwehr's fading volume. Judges typically reward clean, controlled striking over desperate flurries, advantage Swanson if competitive.

Final Confidence Assessment

Confidence level and uncertainty factors

5/10

Confidence Level

Near coin-flip fight — slight edge to veteran experience

Supporting Factors

  • • Superior striking accuracy (51% vs 46%)
  • • Better striking defense (59% vs 52%)
  • • Lower damage absorption (4.00 vs 5.83 SApM)
  • • Vastly more experience (44 vs 25 pro fights)

⚠️Risk Factors

  • • Age (41) and potential durability decline
  • • Landwehr's overwhelming volume (5.63 SLpM)
  • • Reach and height disadvantage for Swanson
  • • Both fighters are unpredictable finishers

🏁Executive Summary

This featherweight clash between Cub Swanson and Nate Landwehr pits veteran precision against chaotic volume in what should be an explosive three-round affair. Swanson's 51% striking accuracy and 59% defense create a cleaner damage profile that favors technical exchanges, while Landwehr's 5.63 SLpM output generates overwhelming pressure that can break down even experienced fighters. The critical dynamic is Landwehr's 5.83 SApM absorption rate—among the highest in the division— which means he takes significant damage while pressing forward. Combined with his 8:45 average fight duration and back-to-back TKO losses, Landwehr's durability appears to be declining at a time when he faces one of the most experienced counter-strikers in featherweight history.

Prediction: Cub Swanson holds a slim 52-48 edge based on technical precision, defensive efficiency, and superior experience. Swanson's most likely path is by KO/TKO (22%) via counter strikes as Landwehr presses forward recklessly, or by Decision (20%) outpointing with accuracy. Landwehr's best path is early KO/TKO (28%) before Swanson can establish timing. This is a genuine coin-flip fight where the outcome likely hinges on whether Landwehr can overwhelm in the first round or Swanson can weather the storm and capitalize in the later rounds.

Skip to main content
Use Tab to navigate through elements, Enter to activate buttons and links.