UFC Perth Betting Analysis: Expert Picks and Value Opportunities

Perth, Western Australia — September 27, 2025

The UFC returns to Perth, Western Australia with a compelling card headlined by Carlos Ulberg vs Dominick Reyes. This UFC Fight Night Perth event presents exceptional betting opportunities for Australian MMA fans and international bettors seeking value in the Perth market. Below we present an analytical, value‑focused preview for three targeted fights where our model and reliability framework provide clear direction: Ulberg vs Reyes, Matthews vs Magny, and Mullarkey vs Bedoya. We emphasize discrepancies between model probabilities and market expectations to highlight genuine value, while keeping an objective tone rooted in measurable performance indicators.

Key UFC Perth Betting Insights:

• Main Event: Carlos Ulberg (62% model probability) vs Dominick Reyes (38%)
• Co-Main: Jake Matthews (tactical pick) vs Neil Magny (58% model probability, high value)
• Featured Bout: Jamie Mullarkey (62% model probability) vs Rolando Bedoya (38%)

Value Betting Meets Reliability

Our approach balances two pillars:

• Model probabilities: Estimates derived from striking effectiveness, defensive responsibility, grappling threats, cardio/pace sustainability, and recent form trends.
• Reliability overlay: A UFC‑experience filter (Optimal/Moderate/High Risk) that calibrates confidence. Optimal data typically comes from fighters with 5+ UFC bouts.

A bet has positive expected value when our true probability exceeds market implied probability. Sometimes the market prices a rightful favorite correctly; in those cases, the opposing side can offer contrarian value if pricing drifts too far.

Arbitrage Opportunities: Current Scan

No sustained arbitrage windows identified at publish time for the three featured fights. We’ll update if actionable cross‑book discrepancies appear pre‑fight.

Main Event Analysis: Carlos Ulberg vs Dominick Reyes

Data Profile and Tactical Read

• Experience reliability: Both optimal (Ulberg ~6 UFC; Reyes ~14). Rich samples reduce variance in our estimates.
• Striking volume/efficiency: Ulberg averages ~6.4 SLpM with 61% accuracy vs Reyes ~4.9 SLpM at 49%. Ulberg also absorbs less (2.4 vs 3.0) and defends slightly better (55% vs 52%). These indicators support sustained round‑winning optics for Ulberg at kickboxing range.
• Power and jeopardy: Reyes retains genuine KO threat and proven five‑round experience. His counter‑right and timing on level‑change looks can still swing momentum.
• Grappling dynamics: Neither leans heavily on takedowns (Ulberg 0.2 TD/15; Reyes 0.4 TD/15). Defensive wrestling is sturdy on both sides (80–82% TDDef). We model largely striking‑led minutes with limited control time.
• Composite indices: Striking composite leans Ulberg (86 vs 80), while grappling composite is close (74 vs 76). Net tilts striking exchanges toward Ulberg in extended minutes.

🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown

• Stance and lanes: Open‑stance dynamics spotlight outside‑foot battles and rear‑hand lanes. Ulberg’s disciplined guard and outside‑low‑kick usage disrupt Reyes’ entries and stance integrity.
• Tempo control: City Kickboxing‑style feints and range re‑sets from Ulberg encourage clean first contacts (jab/low‑kick) rather than extended trades. Reyes excels when opponents linger in mid‑range and overcommit.
• Counter jeopardy: Reyes’ best moments come from intercepting forward steps with rear‑hand counters and check hooks on exits. Ulberg’s defense (55% StrDef, 2.4 absorbed) has improved at pocket exits, but squared stances on resets remain the key risk.
• Defense vs clinch: With both posting strong TD defense and low attempt rates, clinch turns are more about breaking posture and stealing optics than sustained control. Ulberg’s preference is quick breaks back to space; Reyes benefits from brief frames into strikes.
• Minute‑winning recipe: Jab → low‑kick cadence, selective two‑piece volleys, and exit awareness. Reyes increases win probability by forcing resets and turning exchanges into single‑strike impact battles.

🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis (Detailed Analysis Summary)

• Model probability: Ulberg ~62% vs Reyes ~38% (Optimal reliability on both).
• Official pick: Carlos Ulberg — minute‑winning striking profile with manageable grappling risk.
• Keys to victory: Ulberg—protect exits, accumulate with low kicks and jab; Reyes—counter‑timing, trap resets, spike damage moments.
• Risk factors: Reyes’ one‑shot power; Ulberg’s vulnerability if caught squared at range exits.
• Market takeaway & value: If the market sits near 60–63% implied for Ulberg, edge is minimal. If Ulberg inflates beyond ~65% implied, contrarian value opens on Reyes due to finishing equity and experience.

Market vs Model Tension: Jake Matthews vs Neil Magny

Data Profile and Tactical Read

• Experience reliability: Both optimal (Matthews ~15; Magny ~25). Very strong data confidence.
• Striking layers: Matthews posts solid accuracy (52%) and slightly higher SLpM (4.8) than Magny (3.9), with comparable defensive responsibility (Matthews 55% StrDef; Magny 56%) and better optics on clean connections. Magny absorbs less (2.9 vs 3.8), reinforcing his durability and distance management.
• Grappling control: This is the swing axis. Magny generates meaningful wrestling/clinch volume (2.5 TD/15 at 42% with 72% TDDef). Matthews attempts far fewer takedowns (0.3 TD/15 at 20%) and defends at 64%. Historical Magny wins leverage fence control, clinch breaks, and incremental riding time to bank minutes.
• Octagon craft: Magny’s length, pacing, and veteran game scripts tend to dampen opponent burst, elongate exchanges, and produce judge‑friendly rounds without high volatility.

🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown

• Distance vs control: Matthews thrives when exchanges stay centered and he can land the cleaner two‑to‑three‑piece sequences. Magny excels when he glues fights to the fence—pummeling, head‑position battles, short strikes, mat returns.
• Jab economy: Magny’s jab disrupts set‑ups and buys entries to clinch. Matthews must parry/slip early jabs and counter to deter level changes and collar‑tie sequences.
• Scramble insurance: Even brief clinch resets and top‑time spurts can tip close rounds for Magny. Matthews’ defensive reactions at the fence (underhooks, hip turns, frames) are the tactical hinge.
• Damage optics: If Matthews lands the visibly better shots—even at slightly lower volume—he can out‑score control time on optics. Judges tend to reward clean impact when control is transient.

🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis (Detailed Analysis Summary)

• Model probability: Magny ~58% vs Matthews ~42% (Optimal reliability on both).
• Official pick: Jake Matthews — tactical preference for damage‑forward optics despite the model tilt toward Magny.
• Keys to victory: Matthews—win first layer vs jab, counter entries, keep back off the fence; Magny—establish clinch cycles early, mix mat returns, accumulate control optics.
• Risk factors: Matthews’ clinch/defense sustainability vs a high‑IQ fence fighter; Magny’s vulnerability to being out‑damaged in clean space.
• Market takeaway & value: If Matthews is priced as favorite/near‑even, Magny becomes a High‑Value market side relative to our model. If Magny drifts to plus money, value increases further.

Confidence With Caveats: Jamie Mullarkey vs Rolando Bedoya

Data Profile and Tactical Read

• Experience reliability: Mullarkey optimal (~12 UFC); Bedoya moderate (~4). Reliability slightly tempered on Bedoya’s side.
• Pace and pressure: Mullarkey brings higher overall pace (5.0 SLpM) plus credible wrestling volume (2.5 TD/15 at 37%). Bedoya is efficient (48% StrAcc, 54% StrDef) and absorbs less (3.1 vs Mullarkey 4.9), but tends to play in the opponent’s phase when pressured.
• Round‑banking pathways: Mullarkey can alternate threats: forward boxing exchanges into level‑changes to secure fence time, which historically sways rounds even without dominant damage.
• Risk factors: Mullarkey’s higher absorption keeps counter risk live; Bedoya can flip moments if entries become predictable or if Mullarkey’s defense erodes late.

🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown

• First layer pressure: Early cage‑cutting and body work set the tone for Mullarkey. Circling Bedoya without exits can force reactive defense and low‑output minutes.
• Level mixing: Even single‑leg threats off the fence and short top‑time stints can swing rounds. Bedoya’s best counters arrive as Mullarkey exits on straight lines—angle discipline is critical.
• Attrition vs precision: Mullarkey’s attritional style accumulates small edges; Bedoya’s precision seeks sudden momentum shifts. Judges often side with prolonged phase control in close rounds.

🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis (Detailed Analysis Summary)

• Model probability: Mullarkey ~62% vs Bedoya ~38% (Optimal reliability for Mullarkey; Moderate for Bedoya).
• Official pick: Jamie Mullarkey — pressure and level‑mixing create reliable round‑banking in a 3R format.
• Keys to victory: Mullarkey—establish cage craft early, vary entries, avoid extended pocket trades on exits; Bedoya—intercept entries, punish resets, keep exchanges in clean space.
• Risk factors: Defensive lapses on Mullarkey exits; potential low‑output minutes for Bedoya under pressure.
• Market takeaway & value: Near low‑60s implied, Mullarkey offers limited value. Value improves if lines tighten toward a coin‑flip or live markets show sustained fence control and shot‑volume early.

Statistical Summary: Model Probabilities vs Market Notes

Fight	Fighter	Model Probability	Edge/Note
Ulberg vs Reyes	Carlos Ulberg (Pick)	62%	Reyes small contrarian value if price inflates
	Dominick Reyes	38%	KO equity preserves occasional value
Matthews vs Magny	Jake Matthews (Pick)	42%	Tactical pick despite model
	Neil Magny (Value)	58%	High‑Value side if underpriced
Mullarkey vs Bedoya	Jamie Mullarkey (Pick)	62%	Low value unless line tightens
	Rolando Bedoya	38%	Counter moments live, but fewer minute paths

Notes: Market odds vary by timing and source. Value annotations depend on live pricing relative to our model.

Official Picks Summary

• High‑Confidence Tactical Picks

  1. Carlos Ulberg — Minute‑winning striking profile, stable defense
  2. Jake Matthews — Tactical moments over control if Magny’s clinch game stalls
  3. Jamie Mullarkey — Pressure and level‑mixing bank rounds in 3R format

• Value Focus (Market Dependent)

  • Neil Magny — High‑Value when priced below our model
  • Dominick Reyes — Small contrarian value at inflated Ulberg prices

Conclusion: Discipline Over Narratives

Perth offers a balanced slate of tactical angles and value leans. We back Ulberg, Matthews, and Mullarkey on the pick line, while acknowledging Magny’s potential mispricing and Reyes’ contrarian upside when favorite pricing stretches. As always, size positions to edge strength and respect price movement into fight week.

Hashtags: #UFCPerth #ValuePicks