Ketlen Vieira vs Jacqueline Cavalcanti
Women's Bantamweight Bout • UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Costa
Saturday, May 16, 2026 • 25ft Octagon (Small Cage)
Explore Detailed Fighter Profiles
Click on either the fighter's name or profile image for each fighter to access comprehensive UFC statistics including striking metrics, grappling data, clinch performance, complete fight history, offensive & defensive analytics, and round-by-round breakdowns.
Ketlen Vieira
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
Jacqueline Cavalcanti
Fighter Metrics
Victory Methods
Win Round Distribution
📋 Last 5 Fights - Ketlen Vieira
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-22 | Norma Dumont | L | Decision (Split) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-07-27 | Karine Silva | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2023-10-14 | Karol Rosa | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2022-11-05 | Holly Holm | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2022-04-23 | Irene Aldana | L | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
📋 Last 5 Fights - Jacqueline Cavalcanti
| Date | Opponent | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-22 | Gillian Robertson | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2025-06-07 | Wu Yanan | W | TKO (Punches) (R2, 3:15) |
| 2024-12-14 | Stephanie Egger | W | TKO (Punches) (R1, 2:47) |
| 2024-06-22 | Ailin Perez | W | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
| 2024-02-03 | Tamires Vidal | L | Decision (Unanimous) (R3, 5:00) |
Technical Analysis
Technical Score
Cardio Score
Overall Rating
📊 Technical Score
Calculated as the average of Striking Composite (63.0 vs 74.0) and Grappling Composite (65.0 vs 30.0). Balances overall striking effectiveness with grappling ability to measure complete technical skills.
💪 Cardio Score
Based on average fight duration, striking rate per minute, takedown rate, and finish rate. Measures cardiovascular endurance and ability to maintain pace throughout fights.
🎯 Overall Rating
Simple average of Technical Score and Cardio Score. Provides a holistic view of fighter capabilities combining skill level with physical conditioning and fight performance.
Striking Composite
Grappling Composite
Technical Radar Comparison
Visual comparison of key performance metrics between both fighters
📊 Detailed Statistical Comparison
🥊 Fight Analysis Breakdown
🧩 Ketlen Vieira Key Advantages
Vieira's 1.3 submission attempts per 15 minutes against Cavalcanti's 0.0 represents an absolute grappling asymmetry. With 4 career submission victories—predominantly via guillotine choke—Vieira poses a constant threat the moment the fight reaches the clinch or mat. Cavalcanti's 0.0 submission average reflects a complete absence of ground game development, meaning any grappling exchange heavily favors the Brazilian veteran. In the 25-foot cage, Vieira's ability to establish clinch control and threaten choke submissions creates a binary dilemma for Cavalcanti: stay close and risk a submission, or maintain striking range against a 5'11" pressure fighter.
The 25-foot octagon is a critical structural factor. Cavalcanti's 5.65 SLpM output relies on maintaining distance to build volume. In a standard 30-foot cage, she can circle freely and reset after exchanges. The smaller cage compresses available space by nearly 30%, forcing more clinch engagement and reducing Cavalcanti's ability to maintain preferred striking range. Vieira's clinch-to-takedown sequences and guillotine threats become more accessible as cage walls limit movement options. This structural advantage consistently benefits grapplers and may be the decisive factor in close rounds.
Vieira's 14 UFC appearances against Cavalcanti's estimated 7 provide a significant experience differential, particularly in handling cage pressure, late-round pacing, and implementing gameplans under adversity. Vieira has faced ranked opponents including Holly Holm, Karol Rosa, and Irene Aldana—tests that developed her fight IQ and tactical adaptability. This trial-by-fire UFC tenure translates into superior composure when facing setbacks and the ability to execute a grappling game plan through sustained striking resistance.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Cavalcanti's 5.65 SLpM represents one of the higher striking rates in women's bantamweight, landing approximately 2.6 significant strikes per minute. If the fight remains primarily upright and Cavalcanti maintains her preferred distance using front kicks and footwork, she can pile up meaningful strike differentials on scorecards. Vieira's 57% striking defense—meaning roughly 43% of clean shots get through—is a vulnerability Cavalcanti can exploit with her high-output approach. In rounds where Cavalcanti avoids clinch and neutralizes grappling entries, the volume differential can build quickly.
Cavalcanti's 88% takedown defense is elite and represents the primary challenge to Vieira's game plan. If Vieira cannot convert her 0.88 TD15 attempts into meaningful mat time, she loses her primary avenue to fight control. The 33% takedown accuracy Vieira carries means she must attempt multiple shots per round to secure one, expending energy and potentially eating counters on failed entries. If Cavalcanti sprawls effectively and punishes takedown attempts with knees and punches, she can win rounds even without initiating her own offense.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Vieira should leverage her 3-inch height advantage to establish clinch control early. Her guillotine history means Cavalcanti must be cautious every time she ducks forward or enters for underhooks—creating psychological hesitation that benefits Vieira throughout. By mixing jab-clinch sequences with body lock attempts, Vieira can force Cavalcanti into defensive postures that limit her volume output. The longer Vieira makes Cavalcanti think about submission risk, the more conservative and controlled Cavalcanti's striking becomes.
In the 25-foot cage, Vieira should establish fence control early each round, using the shorter octagon to her advantage. Once she pins Cavalcanti to the fence, options expand: underhook battles, takedown entries, clinch knees, and body lock manipulation. Cavalcanti's 0% takedown accuracy means she has virtually no counter-grappling response once Vieira secures a position. Even without completing takedowns, accumulated control time, clinch strikes, and positional dominance score points on judges' cards.
🚀 Jacqueline Cavalcanti Key Advantages
Cavalcanti's 5.65 SLpM represents a 52% volume advantage over Vieira's 3.72. In rounds where the fight stays upright, this translates directly into scorecards—Cavalcanti lands more total significant strikes per minute than Vieira can respond to effectively. Her 46% accuracy combined with this output means approximately 2.6 clean strikes per minute, creating consistent pressure that accumulates round-wide scoring advantages. If Cavalcanti can successfully maintain striking range, even partial rounds of volume advantage can secure her scorecards.
Cavalcanti's 68% striking defense against Vieira's 57% reveals a meaningful defensive edge when trading. She absorbs only 3.17 strikes per minute compared to Vieira's 3.86—a 21% advantage in damage economy over three rounds. Cavalcanti's defensive efficiency while maintaining high output is particularly valuable: 5.65 SLpM output while receiving only 3.17 creates a favorable exchange ratio. In rounds where both fighters primarily trade, these statistics suggest Cavalcanti consistently comes out ahead on both volume and damage accumulation.
At 28 years old, Cavalcanti approaches her athletic peak while Vieira at 34 navigates the physical demands of sustained elite competition. Youth advantages manifest in explosive burst, faster recovery between rounds, and the ability to maintain high output as fatigue sets in. Cavalcanti's 57.1% finish rate suggests she can capitalize on opportunity quickly—a trait that becomes increasingly valuable as accumulated fatigue creates vulnerabilities late in rounds.
⚠️ Unfavorable Scenarios
Cavalcanti's 0.00 TD15 and 0.0 sub attempts reveal a near-complete absence of offensive grappling. Once she finds herself in deep clinch exchanges, underhook battles, or against the fence with Vieira controlling her body, she has no counter-grappling toolkit. Vieira's 4 career submissions and persistent clinch pressure create a scenario where Cavalcanti's striking output drops to near zero while Vieira accumulates control time and scoring through clinch knees and positional work. The 25-foot cage makes escaping these positions especially difficult.
Any time Cavalcanti lowers her head to avoid strikes or enter range, Vieira's guillotine threat becomes existential. Vieira secures chokes from multiple entries—standing clinch, sprawl positions, and mid-takedown sequences. Cavalcanti's absence of submission experience means she lacks the defensive choke-escape mechanics developed through grappling training. A single lapse in head positioning could end the fight immediately, creating a psychological burden that Cavalcanti must manage through all three rounds.
📋 Likely Gameplan
Cavalcanti's optimal path centers on maintaining preferred striking distance using front kicks, low kicks, and jab-cross combinations. Her 70-inch reach should be used to establish range before Vieira closes distance. The front kick to the midsection is her primary reset tool—checking Vieira's forward pressure while scoring. Cavalcanti must be diligent about never letting Vieira establish collar ties or over-under positions, as those entries lead to the sustained clinch control that neutralizes her striker advantages.
When Vieira commits to clinch entries or takedown attempts, Cavalcanti should respond with explosive counter-combinations—stepping back and throwing high-volume straight punches as Vieira's momentum carries forward. This hit-and-reset pattern generates scoring points and potentially fight-ending power shots as Vieira commits to failed entries. Cavalcanti must also maintain central cage positioning rather than allowing Vieira to use the small cage to cut off her angles and reduce movement options.
🎯 Fight Prediction Analysis
Data-driven prediction model based on statistical analysis
📊Detailed Analysis Summary
🏟️Cage Dynamics
The 25-foot octagon fundamentally shapes this matchup in Vieira's favor compared to a standard 30-foot cage. Cavalcanti's striker-first game plan depends on maintaining range to build her 5.65 SLpM output, but the smaller cage compresses available striking space and creates more frequent clinch entries. Vieira's 5'11" frame and clinch-heavy approach become increasingly difficult to avoid as octagon walls reduce movement options. Each time Cavalcanti circles away from the fence, Vieira can cut off angles more quickly, forcing resets at shorter distances where her grappling threat becomes immediate.
🎯Technical Breakdown
The statistical analysis reveals two contrasting expertise zones: Cavalcanti owns the stand-up battle (5.65 vs 3.72 SLpM, 68% vs 57% strike defense), while Vieira has a complete grappling monopoly (1.3 vs 0.0 sub/15min, 0.88 vs 0.00 TD15). The fight will be decided by which zone gets more cumulative time. Cavalcanti's 88% takedown defense represents the most significant barrier to Vieira's game plan—if she can consistently deny takedowns, she directs the fight into her striking lane. However, clinch grappling and submission threats from standing positions don't require completed takedowns to score and generate danger.
🧩Key Battle Areas
Three critical battle areas determine the outcome: clinch entry rates, guillotine threat management, and small-cage movement economy. Cavalcanti must successfully exit clinch engagements more often than she enters them—a difficult task over three rounds against a taller, heavier-handed grappler. Her guillotine defense will be tested in ways she likely hasn't experienced against similarly skilled submission artists. Finally, the 25-foot cage's movement economy test will reveal whether Cavalcanti can maintain her preferred range for sustained periods or whether Vieira's pressure gradually eliminates her spacing options.
🏁Final Prediction
The most likely outcome is Vieira by Decision (32% probability), achieved through accumulated clinch control, fence pressure, and submission threat management that scores rounds on judges' cards. Cavalcanti's KO/TKO path (28%) is active and represents the most dramatic upset scenario—if she can maintain striking range and build volume differentials in the first two rounds, she can win decisively. The submission path for Vieira (15%) represents the highest-value outcome. The fight hinges on whether Cavalcanti's 88% TD defense can neutralize Vieira's grappling threat across all three rounds in the small cage.
💰 Betting Analysis: Model vs Market
Detailed value assessment in the betting market
📊Market Odds
🤖Analytical Model
💎Value Opportunities
MAXIMUM VALUE
Model: 15% | Fair: +567
GOOD VALUE
Model: 28% | Fair: +257
SLIGHT VALUE
Model: 47% | Fair: -113
⚠️Key Market Discrepancies
- • Undervalues small cage grappling – 25ft octagon structurally favors Vieira's clinch game.
- • Overweights striking metrics – Cavalcanti's volume advantage nullified by clinch neutralization.
- • Submission path under-priced – Vieira's guillotine history creates constant existential threat.
🎯 Comprehensive Probabilistic Analysis
100 hypothetical fight simulation based on statistical data
🏆Outcome Distribution - Ketlen Vieira
Clinch control + fence pressure accumulation
Guillotine from standing clinch or sprawl
Accumulated clinch strikes in later rounds
💥Outcome Distribution - Jacqueline Cavalcanti
High-volume striking KO via maintained range
Out-striking Vieira across all 3 rounds
Near-zero grappling history
⏰Fight Timeline Analysis
⚡Window of Opportunity - Jacqueline Cavalcanti
- • First 0–7 minutes: Highest KO equity via volume combinations.
- • Distance tools: Front kicks + jabs to maintain preferred range.
- • Hard resets: Exit clinch fast; never linger in Vieira's guillotine range.
🎯Progressive Dominance - Ketlen Vieira
- • Chain shots: Re-mats and rides bank control and sap pace.
- • Damage economy: Keep exchanges short; minimize risk.
- • Late minutes: Safer control edges decision likelihood.
🎯 Final Confidence Assessment
Confidence level and uncertainty factors
Confidence Level
Strong edge via wrestling cycles and safer damage profile
✅Supporting Factors
- • Significant takedown volume edge (3.25 vs 0.73 TD15)
- • Lower SApM and better damage economy
- • Ride control creates safe scoring minutes
- • Proven cardio over three rounds; scalable to five
⚠️Risk Factors
- • Intercept knees/uppercuts vs level changes
- • Big cage extends early range time
- • Hooker's high-volume surges in pockets
🏁Executive Summary
Arman Tsarukyan's systematic approach to fight control should steadily compress the 30-foot octagon space and bank safe minutes through chain-wrestling sequences, while Dan Hooker's best equity centers on early intercept strikes and range weapons before the Georgian's pressure takes hold. The statistical differentials heavily favor Tsarukyan: his 3.25 TD15 vs Hooker's 0.73 creates a 4.4x takedown volume advantage, while his 1.84 SApM vs Hooker's 4.72 represents superior damage economy that compounds over five rounds. Tsarukyan's 12:36 average fight duration with 70% of wins in Round 3 demonstrates exceptional cardio management, while Hooker's 10:13 duration suggests struggles maintaining his high-volume approach over extended periods. The Georgian's ability to minimize damage while maximizing control time creates a scoring framework that judges consistently reward, especially in championship rounds where damage accumulation becomes visually apparent.
Prediction: Tsarukyan by Decision most likely (40% probability) through consistent takedown pressure and control time accumulation; Hooker's upset lane is early KO/TKO (18%) via intercept knees or uppercuts as Tsarukyan commits to shots. The fight's outcome hinges on whether Hooker can capitalize on his early range advantages before Tsarukyan's wrestling pressure and superior cardio become decisive factors.